LoMar: A Local Defense Against Poisoning Attack on Federated Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.02873v1
- Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2022 18:28:31 GMT
- Title: LoMar: A Local Defense Against Poisoning Attack on Federated Learning
- Abstract summary: Federated learning (FL) provides a high efficient decentralized machine learning framework.
Recent studies have shown that this approach is susceptible to poisoning attacks from the side of remote clients.
We provide a textittwo-phase defense algorithm called Local Malicious Factor (LoMar)
- Score: 22.798328772844805
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Federated learning (FL) provides a high efficient decentralized machine
learning framework, where the training data remains distributed at remote
clients in a network. Though FL enables a privacy-preserving mobile edge
computing framework using IoT devices, recent studies have shown that this
approach is susceptible to poisoning attacks from the side of remote clients.
To address the poisoning attacks on FL, we provide a \textit{two-phase} defense
algorithm called {Lo}cal {Ma}licious Facto{r} (LoMar). In phase I, LoMar scores
model updates from each remote client by measuring the relative distribution
over their neighbors using a kernel density estimation method. In phase II, an
optimal threshold is approximated to distinguish malicious and clean updates
from a statistical perspective. Comprehensive experiments on four real-world
datasets have been conducted, and the experimental results show that our
defense strategy can effectively protect the FL system. {Specifically, the
defense performance on Amazon dataset under a label-flipping attack indicates
that, compared with FG+Krum, LoMar increases the target label testing accuracy
from $96.0\%$ to $98.8\%$, and the overall averaged testing accuracy from
$90.1\%$ to $97.0\%$.
Related papers
- FL-PLAS: Federated Learning with Partial Layer Aggregation for Backdoor Defense Against High-Ratio Malicious Clients [7.1383449614815415]
Federated learning (FL) is gaining increasing attention as an emerging collaborative machine learning approach.<n>The fundamental algorithm of FL, Federated Averaging (FedAvg), is susceptible to backdoor attacks.<n>We propose a novel defense algorithm, FL-PLAS, which can effectively protect local models from backdoor attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-17T14:16:47Z) - Not All Edges are Equally Robust: Evaluating the Robustness of Ranking-Based Federated Learning [49.68790647579509]
Federated Ranking Learning (FRL) is a state-of-the-art FL framework that stands out for its communication efficiency and resilience to poisoning attacks.
We introduce a novel local model poisoning attack against FRL, namely the Vulnerable Edge Manipulation (VEM) attack.
Our attack achieves an overall 53.23% attack impact and is 3.7x more impactful than existing methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-12T00:38:14Z) - Formal Logic-guided Robust Federated Learning against Poisoning Attacks [6.997975378492098]
Federated Learning (FL) offers a promising solution to the privacy concerns associated with centralized Machine Learning (ML)
FL is vulnerable to various security threats, including poisoning attacks, where adversarial clients manipulate the training data or model updates to degrade overall model performance.
We present a defense mechanism designed to mitigate poisoning attacks in federated learning for time-series tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-05T16:23:19Z) - Precision Guided Approach to Mitigate Data Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning [4.907460152017894]
Federated Learning (FL) is a collaborative learning paradigm enabling participants to collectively train a shared machine learning model.
Current FL defense strategies against data poisoning attacks either involve a trade-off between accuracy and robustness.
We present FedZZ, which harnesses a zone-based deviating update (ZBDU) mechanism to effectively counter data poisoning attacks in FL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-05T14:37:49Z) - FreqFed: A Frequency Analysis-Based Approach for Mitigating Poisoning
Attacks in Federated Learning [98.43475653490219]
Federated learning (FL) is susceptible to poisoning attacks.
FreqFed is a novel aggregation mechanism that transforms the model updates into the frequency domain.
We demonstrate that FreqFed can mitigate poisoning attacks effectively with a negligible impact on the utility of the aggregated model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-07T16:56:24Z) - Honest Score Client Selection Scheme: Preventing Federated Learning Label Flipping Attacks in Non-IID Scenarios [27.36889020561564]
Federated Learning (FL) is a promising technology that enables multiple actors to build a joint model without sharing their raw data.
The distributed nature makes FL vulnerable to various poisoning attacks, including model poisoning attacks and data poisoning attacks.
In this paper, we focus on the most representative data poisoning attack - "label flipping attack" and monitor its effectiveness when attacking the existing FL methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-10T02:07:41Z) - FLTracer: Accurate Poisoning Attack Provenance in Federated Learning [38.47921452675418]
Federated Learning (FL) is a promising distributed learning approach that enables multiple clients to collaboratively train a shared global model.
Recent studies show that FL is vulnerable to various poisoning attacks, which can degrade the performance of global models or introduce backdoors into them.
We propose FLTracer, the first FL attack framework to accurately detect various attacks and trace the attack time, objective, type, and poisoned location of updates.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T11:24:38Z) - Avoid Adversarial Adaption in Federated Learning by Multi-Metric
Investigations [55.2480439325792]
Federated Learning (FL) facilitates decentralized machine learning model training, preserving data privacy, lowering communication costs, and boosting model performance through diversified data sources.
FL faces vulnerabilities such as poisoning attacks, undermining model integrity with both untargeted performance degradation and targeted backdoor attacks.
We define a new notion of strong adaptive adversaries, capable of adapting to multiple objectives simultaneously.
MESAS is the first defense robust against strong adaptive adversaries, effective in real-world data scenarios, with an average overhead of just 24.37 seconds.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-06T11:44:42Z) - FedCC: Robust Federated Learning against Model Poisoning Attacks [0.0]
Federated learning is a distributed framework designed to address privacy concerns.
It introduces new attack surfaces, which are especially prone when data is non-Independently and Identically Distributed.
We present FedCC, a simple yet effective novel defense algorithm against model poisoning attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-05T01:52:32Z) - FLIP: A Provable Defense Framework for Backdoor Mitigation in Federated
Learning [66.56240101249803]
We study how hardening benign clients can affect the global model (and the malicious clients)
We propose a trigger reverse engineering based defense and show that our method can achieve improvement with guarantee robustness.
Our results on eight competing SOTA defense methods show the empirical superiority of our method on both single-shot and continuous FL backdoor attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-23T22:24:03Z) - FL-Defender: Combating Targeted Attacks in Federated Learning [7.152674461313707]
Federated learning (FL) enables learning a global machine learning model from local data distributed among a set of participating workers.
FL is vulnerable to targeted poisoning attacks that negatively impact the integrity of the learned model.
We propose textitFL-Defender as a method to combat FL targeted attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-02T16:04:46Z) - Acceleration of Federated Learning with Alleviated Forgetting in Local
Training [61.231021417674235]
Federated learning (FL) enables distributed optimization of machine learning models while protecting privacy.
We propose FedReg, an algorithm to accelerate FL with alleviated knowledge forgetting in the local training stage.
Our experiments demonstrate that FedReg not only significantly improves the convergence rate of FL, especially when the neural network architecture is deep.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-05T02:31:32Z) - Do Gradient Inversion Attacks Make Federated Learning Unsafe? [70.0231254112197]
Federated learning (FL) allows the collaborative training of AI models without needing to share raw data.
Recent works on the inversion of deep neural networks from model gradients raised concerns about the security of FL in preventing the leakage of training data.
In this work, we show that these attacks presented in the literature are impractical in real FL use-cases and provide a new baseline attack.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-14T18:33:12Z) - Local Learning Matters: Rethinking Data Heterogeneity in Federated
Learning [61.488646649045215]
Federated learning (FL) is a promising strategy for performing privacy-preserving, distributed learning with a network of clients (i.e., edge devices)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-28T19:03:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.