Related papers: Make Reddit Great Again: Assessing Community Effects of Moderation Interventions on r/The

Make Reddit Great Again: Assessing Community Effects of Moderation Interventions on r/The_Donald

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.06455v2
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 10:16:35 GMT
Title: Make Reddit Great Again: Assessing Community Effects of Moderation Interventions on r/The_Donald
Authors: Amaury Trujillo, Stefano Cresci
Abstract summary: r/The_Donald was repeatedly denounced as a toxic and misbehaving online community. It was quarantined in June 2019, restricted in February 2020, and finally banned in June 2020, but the effects of this sequence of interventions are still unclear. We find that the interventions greatly reduced the activity of problematic users. However, the interventions also caused an increase in toxicity and led users to share more polarized and less factual news.
Score: 1.1041211464412573
License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Abstract: The subreddit r/The_Donald was repeatedly denounced as a toxic and misbehaving online community, reasons for which it faced a sequence of increasingly constraining moderation interventions by Reddit administrators. It was quarantined in June 2019, restricted in February 2020, and finally banned in June 2020, but despite precursory work on the matter, the effects of this sequence of interventions are still unclear. In this work, we follow a multidimensional causal inference approach to study data containing more than 15M posts made in a time frame of 2 years, to examine the effects of such interventions inside and outside of the subreddit. We find that the interventions greatly reduced the activity of problematic users. However, the interventions also caused an increase in toxicity and led users to share more polarized and less factual news. In addition, the restriction had stronger effects than the quarantine, and core users of r/The_Donald suffered stronger effects than the rest of users. Overall, our results provide evidence that the interventions had mixed effects and paint a nuanced picture of the consequences of community-level moderation strategies. We conclude by reflecting on the challenges of policing online platforms and on the implications for the design and deployment of moderation interventions.

Related papers

Taming Toxicity or Fueling It? The Great Ban`s Role in Shifting Toxic User Behavior and Engagement [0.6918368994425961]
We evaluate the effectiveness of The Great Ban, one of the largest deplatforming interventions carried out by Reddit. We analyzed 53M comments shared by nearly 34K users. We found that 15.6% of the moderated users abandoned the platform while the remaining ones decreased their overall toxicity by 4.1%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-06T16:34:59Z)
The Great Ban: Efficacy and Unintended Consequences of a Massive Deplatforming Operation on Reddit [0.7422344184734279]
We assess the effectiveness of The Great Ban, a massive deplatforming operation that affected nearly 2,000 communities on Reddit. By analyzing 16M comments posted by 17K users during 14 months, we provide nuanced results on the effects, both desired and otherwise.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-20T15:21:37Z)
Analyzing Norm Violations in Live-Stream Chat [49.120561596550395]
We study the first NLP study dedicated to detecting norm violations in conversations on live-streaming platforms. We define norm violation categories in live-stream chats and annotate 4,583 moderated comments from Twitch. Our results show that appropriate contextual information can boost moderation performance by 35%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-18T05:58:27Z)
Non-Polar Opposites: Analyzing the Relationship Between Echo Chambers and Hostile Intergroup Interactions on Reddit [66.09950457847242]
We study the activity of 5.97M Reddit users and 421M comments posted over 13 years. We create a typology of relationships between political communities based on whether their users are toxic to each other.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-25T22:17:07Z)
Automated Content Moderation Increases Adherence to Community Guidelines [16.69856781183336]
We used a fuzzy regression discontinuity design to measure the impact of automated content moderation on subsequent rule-breaking behavior. We found that comment deletion decreased subsequent rule-breaking behavior in shorter threads. Our results suggest that automated content moderation increases adherence to community guidelines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-19T10:41:03Z)
One of Many: Assessing User-level Effects of Moderation Interventions on r/The_Donald [1.1041211464412573]
We evaluate the user level effects of the sequence of moderation interventions that targeted r/The_Donald on Reddit. We find that interventions having strong community level effects also cause extreme and diversified user level reactions. Our results highlight that platform and community level effects are not always representative of the underlying behavior of individuals or smaller user groups.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-19T07:46:18Z)
News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
Face Off: Polarized Public Opinions on Personal Face Mask Usage during the COVID-19 Pandemic [77.34726150561087]
A series of policy shifts by various governmental bodies have been speculated to have contributed to the polarization of face masks. We propose a novel approach to accurately gauge public sentiment towards face masks in the United States during COVID-19. We find two key policy-shift events contributed to statistically significant changes in sentiment for both Republicans and Democrats.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-31T18:52:41Z)
Do Platform Migrations Compromise Content Moderation? Evidence from r/The_Donald and r/Incels [20.41491269475746]
We report the results of a large-scale observational study of how problematic online communities progress following community-level moderation measures. Our results suggest that, in both cases, moderation measures significantly decreased posting activity on the new platform. In spite of that, users in one of the studied communities showed increases in signals associated with toxicity and radicalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-20T16:03:06Z)
Effectiveness and Compliance to Social Distancing During COVID-19 [72.94965109944707]
We use a detailed set of mobility data to evaluate the impact that stay-at-home orders had on the spread of COVID-19 in the US. We show that there is a unidirectional Granger causality, from the median percentage of time spent daily at home to the daily number of COVID-19-related deaths with a lag of 2 weeks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-23T03:36:19Z)
Racism is a Virus: Anti-Asian Hate and Counterspeech in Social Media during the COVID-19 Crisis [51.39895377836919]
COVID-19 has sparked racism and hate on social media targeted towards Asian communities. We study the evolution and spread of anti-Asian hate speech through the lens of Twitter. We create COVID-HATE, the largest dataset of anti-Asian hate and counterspeech spanning 14 months.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-25T21:58:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.