Do not rug on me: Zero-dimensional Scam Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.07220v1
• Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 16:22:43 GMT
• Title: Do not rug on me: Zero-dimensional Scam Detection
• Authors: Bruno Mazorra, Victor Adan, Vanesa Daza
• Abstract summary: This paper increases the data set by 20K tokens and proposes a new methodology to label tokens as scams. We propose various machine-learning-based algorithms with new relevant features related to the token propagation and smart contracts to detect potential rug pulls before they occur.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Uniswap, like other DEXs, has gained much attention this year because it is a non-custodial and publicly verifiable exchange that allows users to trade digital assets without trusted third parties. However, its simplicity and lack of regulation also makes it easy to execute initial coin offering scams by listing non-valuable tokens. This method of performing scams is known as rug pull, a phenomenon that already existed in traditional finance but has become more relevant in DeFi. Various projects such as [34,37] have contributed to detecting rug pulls in EVM compatible chains. However, the first longitudinal and academic step to detecting and characterizing scam tokens on Uniswap was made in [44]. The authors collected all the transactions related to the Uniswap V2 exchange and proposed a machine learning algorithm to label tokens as scams. However, the algorithm is only valuable for detecting scams accurately after they have been executed. This paper increases their data set by 20K tokens and proposes a new methodology to label tokens as scams. After manually analyzing the data, we devised a theoretical classification of different malicious maneuvers in Uniswap protocol. We propose various machine-learning-based algorithms with new relevant features related to the token propagation and smart contract heuristics to detect potential rug pulls before they occur. In general, the models proposed achieved similar results. The best model obtained an accuracy of 0.9936, recall of 0.9540, and precision of 0.9838 in distinguishing non-malicious tokens from scams prior to the malicious maneuver.

Related papers

• FIRP: Faster LLM inference via future intermediate representation prediction [54.897493351694195]
  FIRP generates multiple tokens instead of one at each decoding step. We conduct extensive experiments, showing a speedup ratio of 1.9x-3x in several models and datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T15:53:49Z)
• From Programming Bugs to Multimillion-Dollar Scams: An Analysis of Trapdoor Tokens on Decentralized Exchanges [12.488993570076923]
  A Trapdoor token allows users to buy but prevent them from selling. In a nutshell, by embedding logical bugs and/or owner-only features to the smart contract codes, a Trapdoor token allows users to buy but prevent them from selling. We develop the first systematic classification of Trapdoor tokens and a comprehensive list of their programming techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-09T06:47:23Z)
• Transaction Fraud Detection via an Adaptive Graph Neural Network [64.9428588496749]
  We propose an Adaptive Sampling and Aggregation-based Graph Neural Network (ASA-GNN) that learns discriminative representations to improve the performance of transaction fraud detection. A neighbor sampling strategy is performed to filter noisy nodes and supplement information for fraudulent nodes. Experiments on three real financial datasets demonstrate that the proposed method ASA-GNN outperforms state-of-the-art ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T07:48:39Z)
• Leveraging Machine Learning for Multichain DeFi Fraud Detection [5.213509776274283]
  We present a framework for extracting features from different chains, including the largest one, and it is evaluated over an extensive dataset. Different Machine Learning methods were employed, such as XGBoost and a Neural Network for identifying fraud accounts detection interacting with DeFi. We demonstrate that the introduction of novel DeFi-related features, significantly improves the evaluation results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T15:48:21Z)
• Blockchain Large Language Models [65.7726590159576]
  This paper presents a dynamic, real-time approach to detecting anomalous blockchain transactions. The proposed tool, BlockGPT, generates tracing representations of blockchain activity and trains from scratch a large language model to act as a real-time Intrusion Detection System.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-25T11:56:18Z)
• Explainable Ponzi Schemes Detection on Ethereum [1.3812010983144802]
  Ponzi schemes are one of the most common scams. In this paper, we present a classifier for detecting smart Ponzi contracts on the real-world. We identify a small and effective set of features that ensures a good classification quality and investigate their impacts on the classification using AI techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-12T08:38:23Z)
• An Attention-based Long Short-Term Memory Framework for Detection of Bitcoin Scams [2.0720586052989978]
  Bitcoin is the most common cryptocurrency involved in cyber scams. This paper considers a multi-class classification problem to determine whether a transaction is involved in Ponzi schemes or other cyber scams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T01:20:21Z)
• Token Spammers, Rug Pulls, and SniperBots: An Analysis of the Ecosystem of Tokens in Ethereum and in the Binance Smart Chain (BNB) [50.888293380932616]
  We study the ecosystem of the tokens and liquidity pools. We find that about 60% of tokens are active for less than one day. We estimate that 1-day rug pulls generated $240 million in profits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T14:20:19Z)
• Detecting DeFi Securities Violations from Token Smart Contract Code [0.4263043028086136]
  Decentralized Finance (DeFi) is a system of financial products and services built and delivered through smart contracts on various blockchains. This study aims to uncover whether we can identify DeFi projects potentially engaging in securities violations based on their tokens' smart contract code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-06T01:44:08Z)
• ESCORT: Ethereum Smart COntRacTs Vulnerability Detection using Deep Neural Network and Transfer Learning [80.85273827468063]
  Existing machine learning-based vulnerability detection methods are limited and only inspect whether the smart contract is vulnerable. We propose ESCORT, the first Deep Neural Network (DNN)-based vulnerability detection framework for smart contracts. We show that ESCORT achieves an average F1-score of 95% on six vulnerability types and the detection time is 0.02 seconds per contract.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-23T15:04:44Z)
• ELECTRA: Pre-training Text Encoders as Discriminators Rather Than Generators [108.3381301768299]
  Masked language modeling (MLM) pre-training methods such as BERT corrupt the input by replacing some tokens with [MASK] and then train a model to reconstruct the original tokens. We propose a more sample-efficient pre-training task called replaced token detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-23T21:17:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.