Uncovering More Shallow Heuristics: Probing the Natural Language
Inference Capacities of Transformer-Based Pre-Trained Language Models Using
Syllogistic Patterns
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.07614v1
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 14:15:41 GMT
- Title: Uncovering More Shallow Heuristics: Probing the Natural Language
Inference Capacities of Transformer-Based Pre-Trained Language Models Using
Syllogistic Patterns
- Authors: Reto Gubelmann and Siegfried Handschuh
- Abstract summary: We explore the shallows used by transformer-based pre-trained language models (PLMs) that are fine-tuned for natural language inference (NLI)
We find evidence that the models rely heavily on certain shallows, picking up on symmetries and asymmetries between premise and hypothesis.
- Score: 9.031827448667086
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: In this article, we explore the shallow heuristics used by transformer-based
pre-trained language models (PLMs) that are fine-tuned for natural language
inference (NLI). To do so, we construct or own dataset based on syllogistic,
and we evaluate a number of models' performance on our dataset. We find
evidence that the models rely heavily on certain shallow heuristics, picking up
on symmetries and asymmetries between premise and hypothesis. We suggest that
the lack of generalization observable in our study, which is becoming a topic
of lively debate in the field, means that the PLMs are currently not learning
NLI, but rather spurious heuristics.
Related papers
- Multi-Scales Data Augmentation Approach In Natural Language Inference
For Artifacts Mitigation And Pre-Trained Model Optimization [0.0]
We provide a variety of techniques for analyzing and locating dataset artifacts inside the crowdsourced Stanford Natural Language Inference corpus.
To mitigate dataset artifacts, we employ a unique multi-scale data augmentation technique with two distinct frameworks.
Our combination method enhances our model's resistance to perturbation testing, enabling it to continuously outperform the pre-trained baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-16T23:37:44Z) - Automatically Identifying Semantic Bias in Crowdsourced Natural Language
Inference Datasets [78.6856732729301]
We introduce a model-driven, unsupervised technique to find "bias clusters" in a learned embedding space of hypotheses in NLI datasets.
interventions and additional rounds of labeling can be performed to ameliorate the semantic bias of the hypothesis distribution of a dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-16T22:49:01Z) - Schr\"odinger's Tree -- On Syntax and Neural Language Models [10.296219074343785]
Language models have emerged as NLP's workhorse, displaying increasingly fluent generation capabilities.
We observe a lack of clarity across numerous dimensions, which influences the hypotheses that researchers form.
We outline the implications of the different types of research questions exhibited in studies on syntax.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-17T18:25:23Z) - Language Model Evaluation Beyond Perplexity [47.268323020210175]
We analyze whether text generated from language models exhibits the statistical tendencies present in the human-generated text on which they were trained.
We find that neural language models appear to learn only a subset of the tendencies considered, but align much more closely with empirical trends than proposed theoretical distributions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-31T20:13:44Z) - Masked Language Modeling and the Distributional Hypothesis: Order Word
Matters Pre-training for Little [74.49773960145681]
A possible explanation for the impressive performance of masked language model (MLM)-training is that such models have learned to represent the syntactic structures prevalent in NLP pipelines.
In this paper, we propose a different explanation: pre-trains succeed on downstream tasks almost entirely due to their ability to model higher-order word co-occurrence statistics.
Our results show that purely distributional information largely explains the success of pre-training, and underscore the importance of curating challenging evaluation datasets that require deeper linguistic knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-14T06:30:36Z) - Exploring Transitivity in Neural NLI Models through Veridicality [39.845425535943534]
We focus on the transitivity of inference relations, a fundamental property for systematically drawing inferences.
A model capturing transitivity can compose basic inference patterns and draw new inferences.
We find that current NLI models do not perform consistently well on transitivity inference tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-26T11:18:35Z) - Exploring Lexical Irregularities in Hypothesis-Only Models of Natural
Language Inference [5.283529004179579]
Natural Language Inference (NLI) or Recognizing Textual Entailment (RTE) is the task of predicting the entailment relation between a pair of sentences.
Models that understand entailment should encode both, the premise and the hypothesis.
Experiments by Poliak et al. revealed a strong preference of these models towards patterns observed only in the hypothesis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-19T01:08:06Z) - Unnatural Language Inference [48.45003475966808]
We find that state-of-the-art NLI models, such as RoBERTa and BART, are invariant to, and sometimes even perform better on, examples with randomly reordered words.
Our findings call into question the idea that our natural language understanding models, and the tasks used for measuring their progress, genuinely require a human-like understanding of syntax.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-30T20:40:48Z) - Pre-Training a Language Model Without Human Language [74.11825654535895]
We study how the intrinsic nature of pre-training data contributes to the fine-tuned downstream performance.
We find that models pre-trained on unstructured data beat those trained directly from scratch on downstream tasks.
To our great astonishment, we uncover that pre-training on certain non-human language data gives GLUE performance close to performance pre-trained on another non-English language.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-22T13:38:06Z) - Infusing Finetuning with Semantic Dependencies [62.37697048781823]
We show that, unlike syntax, semantics is not brought to the surface by today's pretrained models.
We then use convolutional graph encoders to explicitly incorporate semantic parses into task-specific finetuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-10T01:27:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.