Exploring Lexical Irregularities in Hypothesis-Only Models of Natural Language Inference

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.07397v3
• Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 01:37:22 GMT
• Title: Exploring Lexical Irregularities in Hypothesis-Only Models of Natural Language Inference
• Authors: Qingyuan Hu, Yi Zhang, Kanishka Misra, Julia Rayz
• Abstract summary: Natural Language Inference (NLI) or Recognizing Textual Entailment (RTE) is the task of predicting the entailment relation between a pair of sentences. Models that understand entailment should encode both, the premise and the hypothesis. Experiments by Poliak et al. revealed a strong preference of these models towards patterns observed only in the hypothesis.
• Score: 5.283529004179579
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Natural Language Inference (NLI) or Recognizing Textual Entailment (RTE) is the task of predicting the entailment relation between a pair of sentences (premise and hypothesis). This task has been described as a valuable testing ground for the development of semantic representations, and is a key component in natural language understanding evaluation benchmarks. Models that understand entailment should encode both, the premise and the hypothesis. However, experiments by Poliak et al. revealed a strong preference of these models towards patterns observed only in the hypothesis, based on a 10 dataset comparison. Their results indicated the existence of statistical irregularities present in the hypothesis that bias the model into performing competitively with the state of the art. While recast datasets provide large scale generation of NLI instances due to minimal human intervention, the papers that generate them do not provide fine-grained analysis of the potential statistical patterns that can bias NLI models. In this work, we analyze hypothesis-only models trained on one of the recast datasets provided in Poliak et al. for word-level patterns. Our results indicate the existence of potential lexical biases that could contribute to inflating the model performance.

Related papers

• Enhancing adversarial robustness in Natural Language Inference using explanations [41.46494686136601]
  We cast the spotlight on the underexplored task of Natural Language Inference (NLI) We validate the usage of natural language explanation as a model-agnostic defence strategy through extensive experimentation. We research the correlation of widely used language generation metrics with human perception, in order for them to serve as a proxy towards robust NLI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-11T17:09:49Z)
• Measuring Causal Effects of Data Statistics on Language Model's `Factual' Predictions [59.284907093349425]
  Large amounts of training data are one of the major reasons for the high performance of state-of-the-art NLP models. We provide a language for describing how training data influences predictions, through a causal framework. Our framework bypasses the need to retrain expensive models and allows us to estimate causal effects based on observational data alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-28T17:36:24Z)
• Naturalistic Causal Probing for Morpho-Syntax [76.83735391276547]
  We suggest a naturalistic strategy for input-level intervention on real world data in Spanish. Using our approach, we isolate morpho-syntactic features from counfounders in sentences. We apply this methodology to analyze causal effects of gender and number on contextualized representations extracted from pre-trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-14T11:47:58Z)
• Pathologies of Pre-trained Language Models in Few-shot Fine-tuning [50.3686606679048]
  We show that pre-trained language models with few examples show strong prediction bias across labels. Although few-shot fine-tuning can mitigate the prediction bias, our analysis shows models gain performance improvement by capturing non-task-related features. These observations alert that pursuing model performance with fewer examples may incur pathological prediction behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-17T15:55:18Z)
• Uncovering More Shallow Heuristics: Probing the Natural Language Inference Capacities of Transformer-Based Pre-Trained Language Models Using Syllogistic Patterns [9.031827448667086]
  We explore the shallows used by transformer-based pre-trained language models (PLMs) that are fine-tuned for natural language inference (NLI) We find evidence that the models rely heavily on certain shallows, picking up on symmetries and asymmetries between premise and hypothesis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-19T14:15:41Z)
• Automatically Identifying Semantic Bias in Crowdsourced Natural Language Inference Datasets [78.6856732729301]
  We introduce a model-driven, unsupervised technique to find "bias clusters" in a learned embedding space of hypotheses in NLI datasets. interventions and additional rounds of labeling can be performed to ameliorate the semantic bias of the hypothesis distribution of a dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T22:49:01Z)
• Instance-Based Neural Dependency Parsing [56.63500180843504]
  We develop neural models that possess an interpretable inference process for dependency parsing. Our models adopt instance-based inference, where dependency edges are extracted and labeled by comparing them to edges in a training set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-28T05:30:52Z)
• A Generative Approach for Mitigating Structural Biases in Natural Language Inference [24.44419010439227]
  In this work, we reformulate the NLI task as a generative task, where a model is conditioned on the biased subset of the input and the label. We show that this approach is highly robust to large amounts of bias. We find that generative models are difficult to train and they generally perform worse than discriminative baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-31T17:59:45Z)
• A comprehensive comparative evaluation and analysis of Distributional Semantic Models [61.41800660636555]
  We perform a comprehensive evaluation of type distributional vectors, either produced by static DSMs or obtained by averaging the contextualized vectors generated by BERT. The results show that the alleged superiority of predict based models is more apparent than real, and surely not ubiquitous. We borrow from cognitive neuroscience the methodology of Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) to inspect the semantic spaces generated by distributional models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-20T15:18:06Z)
• HypoNLI: Exploring the Artificial Patterns of Hypothesis-only Bias in Natural Language Inference [38.14399396661415]
  We derive adversarial examples in terms of the hypothesis-only bias. We investigate two debiasing approaches which exploit the artificial pattern modeling to mitigate such hypothesis-only bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-05T16:46:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.