SoftDropConnect (SDC) -- Effective and Efficient Quantification of the
Network Uncertainty in Deep MR Image Analysis
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.08418v1
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 19:22:26 GMT
- Title: SoftDropConnect (SDC) -- Effective and Efficient Quantification of the
Network Uncertainty in Deep MR Image Analysis
- Authors: Qing Lyu, Christopher T. Whitlow, Ge Wang
- Abstract summary: We propose a novel yet simple Bayesian inference approach called SoftDropConnect (SDC) to quantify the network uncertainty in medical imaging tasks.
Our proposed method generates results withsubstantially improved prediction accuracy (by 10.0%, 5.4% and 3.7% respectively for segmentation in terms of dice score) and greatly reduced uncertainty in terms of mutual information.
- Score: 6.556578665564248
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Recently, deep learning has achieved remarkable successes in medical image
analysis. Although deep neural networks generate clinically important
predictions, they have inherent uncertainty. Such uncertainty is a major
barrier to report these predictions with confidence. In this paper, we propose
a novel yet simple Bayesian inference approach called SoftDropConnect (SDC) to
quantify the network uncertainty in medical imaging tasks with gliomas
segmentation and metastases classification as initial examples. Our key idea is
that during training and testing SDC modulates network parameters continuously
so as to allow affected information processing channels still in operation,
instead of disabling them as Dropout or DropConnet does. When compared with
three popular Bayesian inference methods including Bayes By Backprop, Dropout,
and DropConnect, our SDC method (SDC-W after optimization) outperforms the
three competing methods with a substantial margin. Quantitatively, our proposed
method generates results withsubstantially improved prediction accuracy (by
10.0%, 5.4% and 3.7% respectively for segmentation in terms of dice score; by
11.7%, 3.9%, 8.7% on classification in terms of test accuracy) and greatly
reduced uncertainty in terms of mutual information (by 64%, 33% and 70% on
segmentation; 98%, 88%, and 88% on classification). Our approach promises to
deliver better diagnostic performance and make medical AI imaging more
explainable and trustworthy.
Related papers
- Enhancing Diagnostic in 3D COVID-19 Pneumonia CT-scans through Explainable Uncertainty Bayesian Quantification [0.0]
We explore the use of Bayesian neural networks for classifying COVID-19 pneumonia in 3D CT scans.
We compare deterministic networks and their Bayesian counterpart, enhancing the decision-making accuracy under uncertainty information.
We conclude that explainability along with uncertainty quantification will offer better clinical decisions in medical image analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-18T13:54:33Z) - An Intrinsically Explainable Approach to Detecting Vertebral Compression Fractures in CT Scans via Neurosymbolic Modeling [9.108675519106319]
Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are a common and potentially serious consequence of osteoporosis.
In high-stakes scenarios like opportunistic medical diagnosis, model interpretability is a key factor for the adoption of AI recommendations.
We introduce a neurosymbolic approach for VCF detection in CT volumes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-23T04:01:44Z) - Sparse Bayesian Networks: Efficient Uncertainty Quantification in Medical Image Analysis [4.898968729173388]
We introduce a training procedure for a sparse (partial) Bayesian network.
We exploit the advantages of both representations to achieve high task-specific performance and minimize predictive uncertainty.
Our approach achieves competitive performance and predictive uncertainty estimation by reducing Bayesian parameters by over 95%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T05:12:00Z) - Predictive Accuracy-Based Active Learning for Medical Image Segmentation [5.25147264940975]
We propose an efficient Predictive Accuracy-based Active Learning (PAAL) method for medical image segmentation.
PAAL consists of an Accuracy Predictor (AP) and a Weighted Polling Strategy (WPS)
Experiment results on multiple datasets demonstrate the superiority of PAAL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-01T11:12:08Z) - Leveraging Unlabeled Data for 3D Medical Image Segmentation through
Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning [3.7395287262521717]
Current 3D semi-supervised segmentation methods face significant challenges such as limited consideration of contextual information.
We introduce two distinctworks designed to explore and exploit the discrepancies between them, ultimately correcting the erroneous prediction results.
We employ a self-supervised contrastive learning paradigm to distinguish between reliable and unreliable predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-21T14:03:16Z) - Towards Reliable Medical Image Segmentation by utilizing Evidential Calibrated Uncertainty [52.03490691733464]
We introduce DEviS, an easily implementable foundational model that seamlessly integrates into various medical image segmentation networks.
By leveraging subjective logic theory, we explicitly model probability and uncertainty for the problem of medical image segmentation.
DeviS incorporates an uncertainty-aware filtering module, which utilizes the metric of uncertainty-calibrated error to filter reliable data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-01T05:02:46Z) - Can pruning improve certified robustness of neural networks? [106.03070538582222]
We show that neural network pruning can improve empirical robustness of deep neural networks (NNs)
Our experiments show that by appropriately pruning an NN, its certified accuracy can be boosted up to 8.2% under standard training.
We additionally observe the existence of certified lottery tickets that can match both standard and certified robust accuracies of the original dense models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-15T05:48:51Z) - Towards Reducing Labeling Cost in Deep Object Detection [61.010693873330446]
We propose a unified framework for active learning, that considers both the uncertainty and the robustness of the detector.
Our method is able to pseudo-label the very confident predictions, suppressing a potential distribution drift.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-22T16:53:09Z) - Estimating Uncertainty in Neural Networks for Cardiac MRI Segmentation:
A Benchmark Study [1.6222504666823843]
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have demonstrated promise in automated cardiac magnetic resonance imaging segmentation.
It is important to quantify segmentation uncertainty in order to know which segmentations could be problematic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-31T17:46:52Z) - Uncertainty-Aware Deep Calibrated Salient Object Detection [74.58153220370527]
Existing deep neural network based salient object detection (SOD) methods mainly focus on pursuing high network accuracy.
These methods overlook the gap between network accuracy and prediction confidence, known as the confidence uncalibration problem.
We introduce an uncertaintyaware deep SOD network, and propose two strategies to prevent deep SOD networks from being overconfident.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-10T23:28:36Z) - An Uncertainty-Driven GCN Refinement Strategy for Organ Segmentation [53.425900196763756]
We propose a segmentation refinement method based on uncertainty analysis and graph convolutional networks.
We employ the uncertainty levels of the convolutional network in a particular input volume to formulate a semi-supervised graph learning problem.
We show that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art CRF refinement method by improving the dice score by 1% for the pancreas and 2% for spleen.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-06T18:55:07Z) - Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under
Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation.
We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.