Going Extreme: Comparative Analysis of Hate Speech in Parler and Gab

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11770v1
• Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 19:29:17 GMT
• Title: Going Extreme: Comparative Analysis of Hate Speech in Parler and Gab
• Authors: Abraham Israeli and Oren Tsur
• Abstract summary: We provide the first large scale analysis of hate-speech on Parler. In order to improve classification accuracy we annotated 10K Parler posts. We find that hate mongers make 16.1% of Parler active users.
• Score: 2.487445341407889
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Social platforms such as Gab and Parler, branded as `free-speech' networks, have seen a significant growth of their user base in recent years. This popularity is mainly attributed to the stricter moderation enforced by mainstream platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and Reddit. In this work we provide the first large scale analysis of hate-speech on Parler. We experiment with an array of algorithms for hate-speech detection, demonstrating limitations of transfer learning in that domain, given the illusive and ever changing nature of the ways hate-speech is delivered. In order to improve classification accuracy we annotated 10K Parler posts, which we use to fine-tune a BERT classifier. Classification of individual posts is then leveraged for the classification of millions of users via label propagation over the social network. Classifying users by their propensity to disseminate hate, we find that hate mongers make 16.1\% of Parler active users, and that they have distinct characteristics comparing to other user groups. We find that hate mongers are more active, more central and express distinct levels of sentiment and convey a distinct array of emotions like anger and sadness. We further complement our analysis by comparing the trends discovered in Parler and those found in Gab. To the best of our knowledge, this is among the first works to analyze hate speech in Parler in a quantitative manner and on the user level, and the first annotated dataset to be made available to the community.

Related papers

• Analyzing User Characteristics of Hate Speech Spreaders on Social Media [20.57872238271025]
  We analyze the role of user characteristics in hate speech resharing across different types of hate speech. We find that users with little social influence tend to share more hate speech. Political anti-Trump and anti-right-wing hate is reshared by users with larger social influence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T12:17:48Z)
• When the Majority is Wrong: Modeling Annotator Disagreement for Subjective Tasks [45.14664901245331]
  A crucial problem in hate speech detection is determining whether a statement is offensive to a demographic group. We construct a model that predicts individual annotator ratings on potentially offensive text. We find that annotator ratings can be predicted using their demographic information and opinions on online content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-11T07:55:20Z)
• Hate Speech Targets Detection in Parler using BERT [0.0]
  We present a pipeline for detecting hate speech and its targets and use it for creating Parler hate targets' distribution. The pipeline consists of two models; one for hate speech detection and the second for target classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-03T17:49:04Z)
• CoSyn: Detecting Implicit Hate Speech in Online Conversations Using a Context Synergized Hyperbolic Network [52.85130555886915]
  CoSyn is a context-synergized neural network that explicitly incorporates user- and conversational context for detecting implicit hate speech in online conversations. We show that CoSyn outperforms all our baselines in detecting implicit hate speech with absolute improvements in the range of 1.24% - 57.8%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T17:30:43Z)
• CRUSH: Contextually Regularized and User anchored Self-supervised Hate speech Detection [6.759148939470331]
  We introduce CRUSH, a framework for hate speech detection using user-anchored self-supervision and contextual regularization. Our proposed approach secures 1-12% improvement in test set metrics over best performing previous approaches on two types of tasks and multiple popular english social media datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-13T13:51:51Z)
• Hate Speech Classification Using SVM and Naive BAYES [0.0]
  Many countries have developed laws to avoid online hate speech. But as online content continues to grow, so does the spread of hate speech. It is important to automatically process the online user contents to detect and remove hate speech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-21T17:15:38Z)
• Deep Learning for Hate Speech Detection: A Comparative Study [54.42226495344908]
  We present here a large-scale empirical comparison of deep and shallow hate-speech detection methods. Our goal is to illuminate progress in the area, and identify strengths and weaknesses in the current state-of-the-art. In doing so we aim to provide guidance as to the use of hate-speech detection in practice, quantify the state-of-the-art, and identify future research directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-19T03:48:20Z)
• Addressing the Challenges of Cross-Lingual Hate Speech Detection [115.1352779982269]
  In this paper we focus on cross-lingual transfer learning to support hate speech detection in low-resource languages. We leverage cross-lingual word embeddings to train our neural network systems on the source language and apply it to the target language. We investigate the issue of label imbalance of hate speech datasets, since the high ratio of non-hate examples compared to hate examples often leads to low model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T20:48:14Z)
• Hate speech detection using static BERT embeddings [0.9176056742068814]
  Hate speech is emerging as a major concern, where it expresses abusive speech that targets specific group characteristics. In this paper, we analyze the performance of hate speech detection by replacing or integrating the word embeddings. In comparison to fine-tuned BERT, one metric that significantly improved is specificity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-29T16:17:10Z)
• Racism is a Virus: Anti-Asian Hate and Counterspeech in Social Media during the COVID-19 Crisis [51.39895377836919]
  COVID-19 has sparked racism and hate on social media targeted towards Asian communities. We study the evolution and spread of anti-Asian hate speech through the lens of Twitter. We create COVID-HATE, the largest dataset of anti-Asian hate and counterspeech spanning 14 months.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-25T21:58:09Z)
• Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
  We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms. We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features. We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.