Parameter Transfer for Quantum Approximate Optimization of Weighted
MaxCut
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11785v2
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 19:51:03 GMT
- Title: Parameter Transfer for Quantum Approximate Optimization of Weighted
MaxCut
- Authors: Ruslan Shaydulin, Phillip C. Lotshaw, Jeffrey Larson, James Ostrowski,
and Travis S. Humble
- Abstract summary: We show that for a given QAOA depth, a single "typical" vector of QAOA parameters can be successfully transferred to weighted MaxCut instances.
This transfer leads to a median decrease in the approximation ratio of only 2.0 percentage points.
- Score: 2.8087801395910525
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Finding high-quality parameters is a central obstacle to using the quantum
approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA). Previous work partially addresses
this issue for QAOA on unweighted MaxCut problems by leveraging similarities in
the objective landscape among different problem instances. However, we show
that the more general weighted MaxCut problem has significantly modified
objective landscapes, with a proliferation of poor local optima. Our main
contribution is a simple rescaling scheme that overcomes these deleterious
effects of weights. We show that for a given QAOA depth, a single "typical"
vector of QAOA parameters can be successfully transferred to weighted MaxCut
instances. This transfer leads to a median decrease in the approximation ratio
of only 2.0 percentage points relative to a considerably more expensive direct
optimization on a dataset of 34,701 instances with up to 20 nodes and multiple
weight distributions. This decrease can be reduced to 1.2 percentage points at
the cost of only 10 additional QAOA circuit evaluations with parameters sampled
from a pretrained metadistribution, or the transferred parameters can be used
as a starting point for a single local optimization run to obtain approximation
ratios equivalent to those achieved by exhaustive optimization in $96.35\%$ of
our cases.
Related papers
- Transfer learning of optimal QAOA parameters in combinatorial
optimization [0.46040036610482665]
We study the transfer learning (TL) methodology to reuse pre-trained QAOA parameters of one problem instance into different COP instances.
In this work, we select small cases of the traveling salesman problem (TSP), the bin packing problem (BPP), the knapsack problem (KP), the weighted maximum cut (MaxCut) problem, and portfolio optimization (PO)
We show that cross-platform TL is possible using the D-Wave Advantage quantum annealer with the parameters found for BPP.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-08T10:35:23Z) - Graph Representation Learning for Parameter Transferability in Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm [1.0971022294548696]
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is one of the most promising candidates for achieving quantum advantage through quantum-enhanced optimization.
In this work, we apply five different graph embedding techniques to determine good donor candidates for parameter transferability.
Using this technique, we effectively reduce the number of iterations required for parameter optimization, obtaining an approximate solution to the target problem with an order of magnitude speedup.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-12T16:01:53Z) - Parameter Setting in Quantum Approximate Optimization of Weighted
Problems [10.396104620517171]
In this work, we develop parameter settings for QAOA applied to a general class of weighted problems.
First, we derive optimal parameters for QAOA with depth $p=1$ applied to the weighted MaxCut problem under different assumptions on the weights.
Second, for $pgeq 1$ we prove that the QAOA energy landscape for weighted MaxCut approaches that for the unweighted case under a simple rescaling of parameters.
Third, we propose a general rescaling scheme inspired by the analytical results for weighted MaxCut and demonstrate its effectiveness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T14:37:33Z) - QAOA-in-QAOA: solving large-scale MaxCut problems on small quantum
machines [81.4597482536073]
Quantum approximate optimization algorithms (QAOAs) utilize the power of quantum machines and inherit the spirit of adiabatic evolution.
We propose QAOA-in-QAOA ($textQAOA2$) to solve arbitrary large-scale MaxCut problems using quantum machines.
Our method can be seamlessly embedded into other advanced strategies to enhance the capability of QAOAs in large-scale optimization problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-24T03:49:10Z) - Twisted hybrid algorithms for combinatorial optimization [68.8204255655161]
Proposed hybrid algorithms encode a cost function into a problem Hamiltonian and optimize its energy by varying over a set of states with low circuit complexity.
We show that for levels $p=2,ldots, 6$, the level $p$ can be reduced by one while roughly maintaining the expected approximation ratio.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-01T19:47:16Z) - STORM+: Fully Adaptive SGD with Momentum for Nonconvex Optimization [74.1615979057429]
We investigate non-batch optimization problems where the objective is an expectation over smooth loss functions.
Our work builds on the STORM algorithm, in conjunction with a novel approach to adaptively set the learning rate and momentum parameters.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-01T15:43:36Z) - Multi-angle Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm [0.2609784101826761]
We introduce a multi-angle ansatz for QAOA that reduces circuit depth and improves the approximation ratio.
This new ansatz gives a 33% increase in the approximation ratio for an infinite family of MaxCut instances over QAOA.
Results indicate that multi-angle QAOA requires shallower circuits to solve problems than QAOA, making it more viable for near-term intermediate-scale quantum devices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-23T15:57:49Z) - Empirical performance bounds for quantum approximate optimization [0.27998963147546135]
Quantifying performance bounds provides insight into when QAOA may be viable for solving real-world applications.
We find QAOA exceeds the Goemans-Williamson approximation ratio bound for most graphs.
The resulting data set is presented as a benchmark for establishing empirical bounds on QAOA performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-12T23:12:09Z) - Balancing Rates and Variance via Adaptive Batch-Size for Stochastic
Optimization Problems [120.21685755278509]
In this work, we seek to balance the fact that attenuating step-size is required for exact convergence with the fact that constant step-size learns faster in time up to an error.
Rather than fixing the minibatch the step-size at the outset, we propose to allow parameters to evolve adaptively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-02T16:02:02Z) - Convergence of adaptive algorithms for weakly convex constrained
optimization [59.36386973876765]
We prove the $mathcaltilde O(t-1/4)$ rate of convergence for the norm of the gradient of Moreau envelope.
Our analysis works with mini-batch size of $1$, constant first and second order moment parameters, and possibly smooth optimization domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-11T17:43:19Z) - Cross Entropy Hyperparameter Optimization for Constrained Problem
Hamiltonians Applied to QAOA [68.11912614360878]
Hybrid quantum-classical algorithms such as Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) are considered as one of the most encouraging approaches for taking advantage of near-term quantum computers in practical applications.
Such algorithms are usually implemented in a variational form, combining a classical optimization method with a quantum machine to find good solutions to an optimization problem.
In this study we apply a Cross-Entropy method to shape this landscape, which allows the classical parameter to find better parameters more easily and hence results in an improved performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-11T13:52:41Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.