Training Differentially Private Models with Secure Multiparty Computation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.02625v1
• Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2022 20:00:37 GMT
• Title: Training Differentially Private Models with Secure Multiparty Computation
• Authors: Sikha Pentyala, Davis Railsback, Ricardo Maia, Rafael Dowsley, David Melanson, Anderson Nascimento, Martine De Cock
• Abstract summary: We address the problem of learning a machine learning model from data that originates at multiple data owners. Existing solutions based on Differential Privacy (DP) achieve this at the cost of a drop in accuracy. Our solution relies on an MPC protocol for model training, and an MPC protocol for perturbing the trained model coefficients with Laplace noise.
• Score: 12.628792164922864
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We address the problem of learning a machine learning model from training data that originates at multiple data owners while providing formal privacy guarantees regarding the protection of each owner's data. Existing solutions based on Differential Privacy (DP) achieve this at the cost of a drop in accuracy. Solutions based on Secure Multiparty Computation (MPC) do not incur such accuracy loss but leak information when the trained model is made publicly available. We propose an MPC solution for training DP models. Our solution relies on an MPC protocol for model training, and an MPC protocol for perturbing the trained model coefficients with Laplace noise in a privacy-preserving manner. The resulting MPC+DP approach achieves higher accuracy than a pure DP approach while providing the same formal privacy guarantees. Our work obtained first place in the iDASH2021 Track III competition on confidential computing for secure genome analysis.

Related papers

• Pseudo-Probability Unlearning: Towards Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Machine Unlearning [59.29849532966454]
  We propose PseudoProbability Unlearning (PPU), a novel method that enables models to forget data to adhere to privacy-preserving manner. Our method achieves over 20% improvements in forgetting error compared to the state-of-the-art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T21:27:06Z)
• Too Good to be True? Turn Any Model Differentially Private With DP-Weights [0.0]
  We introduce a groundbreaking approach that applies differential privacy noise to the model's weights after training. We offer a comprehensive mathematical proof for this novel approach's privacy bounds. We empirically evaluate its effectiveness using membership inference attacks and performance evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T19:58:11Z)
• Pre-training Differentially Private Models with Limited Public Data [54.943023722114134]
  differential privacy (DP) is a prominent method to gauge the degree of security provided to the models. DP is yet not capable of protecting a substantial portion of the data used during the initial pre-training stage. We develop a novel DP continual pre-training strategy using only 10% of public data. Our strategy can achieve DP accuracy of 41.5% on ImageNet-21k, as well as non-DP accuracy of 55.7% and and 60.0% on downstream tasks Places365 and iNaturalist-2021.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T23:26:27Z)
• LLM-based Privacy Data Augmentation Guided by Knowledge Distillation with a Distribution Tutor for Medical Text Classification [67.92145284679623]
  We propose a DP-based tutor that models the noised private distribution and controls samples' generation with a low privacy cost. We theoretically analyze our model's privacy protection and empirically verify our model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T11:52:55Z)
• Discriminative Adversarial Privacy: Balancing Accuracy and Membership Privacy in Neural Networks [7.0895962209555465]
  Discriminative Adversarial Privacy (DAP) is a learning technique designed to achieve a balance between model performance, speed, and privacy. DAP relies on adversarial training based on a novel loss function able to minimise the prediction error while maximising the MIA's error. In addition, we introduce a novel metric named Accuracy Over Privacy (AOP) to capture the performance-privacy trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-05T17:25:45Z)
• Private, Efficient, and Accurate: Protecting Models Trained by Multi-party Learning with Differential Privacy [8.8480262507008]
  We propose PEA (Private, Efficient, Accurate), which consists of a secure DPSGD protocol and two optimization methods. We implement PEA in two open-source MPL frameworks: TF-Encrypted and Queqiao. Experiments show that PEA can train a differentially private classification model with an accuracy of 88% for CIFAR-10 within 7 minutes under the LAN setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-18T06:48:25Z)
• Large Scale Transfer Learning for Differentially Private Image Classification [51.10365553035979]
  Differential Privacy (DP) provides a formal framework for training machine learning models with individual example level privacy. Private training using DP-SGD protects against leakage by injecting noise into individual example gradients. While this result is quite appealing, the computational cost of training large-scale models with DP-SGD is substantially higher than non-private training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-06T01:22:20Z)
• Personalized PATE: Differential Privacy for Machine Learning with Individual Privacy Guarantees [1.2691047660244335]
  We propose three novel methods to support training an ML model with different personalized privacy guarantees within the training data. Our experiments show that our personalized privacy methods yield higher accuracy models than the non-personalized baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T20:16:27Z)
• Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private Learners [70.0317718115406]
  Differentially Private (DP) learning has seen limited success for building large deep learning models of text. We show that this performance drop can be mitigated with the use of large pretrained models. We propose a memory saving technique that allows clipping in DP-SGD to run without instantiating per-example gradients.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-12T01:45:27Z)
• PRICURE: Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Inference in a Multi-Party Setting [3.822543555265593]
  This paper presents PRICURE, a system that combines complementary strengths of secure multi-party computation and differential privacy. PRICURE enables privacy-preserving collaborative prediction among multiple model owners. We evaluate PRICURE on neural networks across four datasets including benchmark medical image classification datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-19T05:55:53Z)
• User-Level Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning: Analysis and Performance Optimization [77.43075255745389]
  Federated learning (FL) is capable of preserving private data from mobile terminals (MTs) while training the data into useful models. From a viewpoint of information theory, it is still possible for a curious server to infer private information from the shared models uploaded by MTs. We propose a user-level differential privacy (UDP) algorithm by adding artificial noise to the shared models before uploading them to servers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-29T10:13:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.