Boolean Observation Games
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.03637v2
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 10:54:32 GMT
- Title: Boolean Observation Games
- Authors: Hans van Ditmarsch and Sunil Simon
- Abstract summary: We introduce a subclass of finite strategic games with incomplete information and qualitative objectives.
In Boolean observation games, each player is associated with a finite set of propositional variables of which only it can observe the value.
We identify conditions under which, given an outcome relation, Nash equilibria are guaranteed to exist.
- Score: 0.6526824510982799
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: We introduce Boolean Observation Games, a subclass of multi-player finite
strategic games with incomplete information and qualitative objectives. In
Boolean observation games, each player is associated with a finite set of
propositional variables of which only it can observe the value, and it controls
whether and to whom it can reveal that value. It does not control the given,
fixed, value of variables. Boolean observation games are a generalization of
Boolean games, a well-studied subclass of strategic games but with complete
information, and wherein each player controls the value of its variables.
In Boolean observation games, player goals describe multi-agent knowledge of
variables. As in classical strategic games, players choose their strategies
simultaneously and therefore observation games capture aspects of both
imperfect and incomplete information. They require reasoning about sets of
outcomes given sets of indistinguishable valuations of variables. An outcome
relation between such sets determines what the Nash equilibria are. We present
various outcome relations, including a qualitative variant of ex-post
equilibrium. We identify conditions under which, given an outcome relation,
Nash equilibria are guaranteed to exist. We also study the complexity of
checking for the existence of Nash equilibria and of verifying if a strategy
profile is a Nash equilibrium. We further study the subclass of Boolean
observation games with `knowing whether' goal formulas, for which the
satisfaction does not depend on the value of variables. We show that each such
Boolean observation game corresponds to a Boolean game and vice versa, by a
different correspondence, and that both correspondences are precise in terms of
existence of Nash equilibria.
Related papers
- Quantum Cournot model based on general entanglement operator [0.0]
The relationship between the degree of entanglement of the initial state of the game and the payoff values in Nash equilibrium is ambiguous.
In a quantum duopoly based on the initial state of a game that depends on one squeezing parameter, the maximum possible payoff in Nash equilibrium cannot be reached when the value of the phase parameter is greater than zero.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-23T08:24:17Z) - Imperfect-Recall Games: Equilibrium Concepts and Their Complexity [74.01381499760288]
We investigate optimal decision making under imperfect recall, that is, when an agent forgets information it once held before.
In the framework of extensive-form games with imperfect recall, we analyze the computational complexities of finding equilibria in multiplayer settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-23T00:27:28Z) - Abstracting Imperfect Information Away from Two-Player Zero-Sum Games [85.27865680662973]
Nayyar et al. (2013) showed that imperfect information can be abstracted away from common-payoff games by having players publicly announce their policies as they play.
This work shows that certain regularized equilibria do not possess the aforementioned non-correspondence problem.
Because these regularized equilibria can be made arbitrarily close to Nash equilibria, our result opens the door to a new perspective to solving two-player zero-sum games.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-22T16:54:06Z) - Finding mixed-strategy equilibria of continuous-action games without
gradients using randomized policy networks [83.28949556413717]
We study the problem of computing an approximate Nash equilibrium of continuous-action game without access to gradients.
We model players' strategies using artificial neural networks.
This paper is the first to solve general continuous-action games with unrestricted mixed strategies and without any gradient information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-29T05:16:41Z) - Learning Correlated Equilibria in Mean-Field Games [62.14589406821103]
We develop the concepts of Mean-Field correlated and coarse-correlated equilibria.
We show that they can be efficiently learnt in emphall games, without requiring any additional assumption on the structure of the game.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-22T08:31:46Z) - Multiplayer Performative Prediction: Learning in Decision-Dependent
Games [18.386569111954213]
This paper formulates a new game theoretic framework for multi-player performative prediction.
We focus on two distinct solution concepts, namely (i) performatively stable equilibria and (ii) Nash equilibria of the game.
We show that under mild assumptions, the performatively stable equilibria can be found efficiently by a variety of algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-10T15:31:10Z) - Towards convergence to Nash equilibria in two-team zero-sum games [17.4461045395989]
Two-team zero-sum games are defined as multi-player games where players are split into two competing sets of agents.
We focus on the solution concept of Nash equilibria (NE)
We show that computing NE for this class of games is $textithard$ for the complexity class $mathrm$.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-07T21:15:35Z) - Learning to Compute Approximate Nash Equilibrium for Normal-form Games [15.321036952379488]
We propose a general meta learning approach to computing approximate Nash equilibrium for finite $n$-player normal-form games.
Unlike existing solutions that approximate or learn a Nash equilibrium from scratch for each of the games, our meta solver directly constructs a mapping from a game utility matrix to a joint strategy profile.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-17T07:06:46Z) - Sample-Efficient Learning of Stackelberg Equilibria in General-Sum Games [78.65798135008419]
It remains vastly open how to learn the Stackelberg equilibrium in general-sum games efficiently from samples.
This paper initiates the theoretical study of sample-efficient learning of the Stackelberg equilibrium in two-player turn-based general-sum games.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-23T05:11:07Z) - No-regret learning and mixed Nash equilibria: They do not mix [64.37511607254115]
We study the dynamics of "follow-the-regularized-leader" (FTRL)
We show that any Nash equilibrium which is not strict cannot be stable and attracting under FTRL.
This result has significant implications for predicting the outcome of a learning process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-19T13:49:06Z) - Equilibria for Games with Combined Qualitative and Quantitative
Objectives [15.590197778287616]
We study concurrent games in which each player is a process that is assumed to act independently and strategically.
Our main result is that deciding the existence of a strict epsilon Nash equilibrium in such games is 2ExpTime-complete.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-13T01:56:24Z) - The Electromagnetic Balance Game: A Probabilistic Perspective [3.096615629099617]
Finding a counterfeit coin with the different weight from a set of visually identical coin using a balance is an intersting and inspiring question.
In this paper some variants of the balance game are dicussed, especially from a probabilistic perspective.
We focus on the predetermined setting, where the player has to arrange the strategy without observing the outcome of the balancing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-21T11:49:00Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.