Machine Explanations and Human Understanding

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.04092v3
• Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 06:56:24 GMT
• Title: Machine Explanations and Human Understanding
• Authors: Chacha Chen, Shi Feng, Amit Sharma, Chenhao Tan
• Abstract summary: Explanations are hypothesized to improve human understanding of machine learning models. empirical studies have found mixed and even negative results. We show how human intuitions play a central role in enabling human understanding.
• Score: 31.047297225560566
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Explanations are hypothesized to improve human understanding of machine learning models and achieve a variety of desirable outcomes, ranging from model debugging to enhancing human decision making. However, empirical studies have found mixed and even negative results. An open question, therefore, is under what conditions explanations can improve human understanding and in what way. Using adapted causal diagrams, we provide a formal characterization of the interplay between machine explanations and human understanding, and show how human intuitions play a central role in enabling human understanding. Specifically, we identify three core concepts of interest that cover all existing quantitative measures of understanding in the context of human-AI decision making: task decision boundary, model decision boundary, and model error. Our key result is that without assumptions about task-specific intuitions, explanations may potentially improve human understanding of model decision boundary, but they cannot improve human understanding of task decision boundary or model error. To achieve complementary human-AI performance, we articulate possible ways on how explanations need to work with human intuitions. For instance, human intuitions about the relevance of features (e.g., education is more important than age in predicting a person's income) can be critical in detecting model error. We validate the importance of human intuitions in shaping the outcome of machine explanations with empirical human-subject studies. Overall, our work provides a general framework along with actionable implications for future algorithmic development and empirical experiments of machine explanations.

Related papers

• Evaluating the Utility of Model Explanations for Model Development [54.23538543168767]
  We evaluate whether explanations can improve human decision-making in practical scenarios of machine learning model development. To our surprise, we did not find evidence of significant improvement on tasks when users were provided with any of the saliency maps. These findings suggest caution regarding the usefulness and potential for misunderstanding in saliency-based explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-10T23:13:23Z)
• Explaining Explainability: Towards Deeper Actionable Insights into Deep Learning through Second-order Explainability [70.60433013657693]
  Second-order explainable AI (SOXAI) was recently proposed to extend explainable AI (XAI) from the instance level to the dataset level. We demonstrate for the first time, via example classification and segmentation cases, that eliminating irrelevant concepts from the training set based on actionable insights from SOXAI can enhance a model's performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-14T23:24:01Z)
• Interpreting Neural Policies with Disentangled Tree Representations [58.769048492254555]
  We study interpretability of compact neural policies through the lens of disentangled representation. We leverage decision trees to obtain factors of variation for disentanglement in robot learning. We introduce interpretability metrics that measure disentanglement of learned neural dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T01:10:41Z)
• Explanatory machine learning for sequential human teaching [5.706360286474043]
  We show that sequential teaching of concepts with increasing complexity has a beneficial effect on human comprehension. We propose a framework for the effects of sequential teaching on comprehension based on an existing definition of comprehensibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T15:23:46Z)
• Deep Interpretable Models of Theory of Mind For Human-Agent Teaming [0.7734726150561086]
  We develop an interpretable modular neural framework for modeling the intentions of other observed entities. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach with experiments on data from human participants on a search and rescue task in Minecraft.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T06:18:58Z)
• Cognitive Perspectives on Context-based Decisions and Explanations [0.0]
  We show that the Contextual Importance and Utility method for XAI share an overlap with the current new wave of action-oriented predictive representational structures. This has an influencing effect on explainable AI, where the goal is to provide explanations of computer decision-making for a human audience.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-25T15:49:52Z)
• Dissonance Between Human and Machine Understanding [16.32018730049208]
  We present a large-scale crowdsourcing study that reveals and quantifies the dissonance between human and machine understanding. Our findings have important implications on human-machine collaboration, considering that a long term goal in the field of artificial intelligence is to make machines capable of learning and reasoning like humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-18T21:45:35Z)
• Machine Common Sense [77.34726150561087]
  Machine common sense remains a broad, potentially unbounded problem in artificial intelligence (AI) This article deals with the aspects of modeling commonsense reasoning focusing on such domain as interpersonal interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T13:59:47Z)
• Joint Inference of States, Robot Knowledge, and Human (False-)Beliefs [90.20235972293801]
  Aiming to understand how human (false-temporal)-belief-a core socio-cognitive ability unify-would affect human interactions with robots, this paper proposes to adopt a graphical model to the representation of object states, robot knowledge, and human (false-)beliefs. An inference algorithm is derived to fuse individual pg from all robots across multi-views into a joint pg, which affords more effective reasoning inference capability to overcome the errors originated from a single view.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-25T23:02:04Z)
• A general framework for scientifically inspired explanations in AI [76.48625630211943]
  We instantiate the concept of structure of scientific explanation as the theoretical underpinning for a general framework in which explanations for AI systems can be implemented. This framework aims to provide the tools to build a "mental-model" of any AI system so that the interaction with the user can provide information on demand and be closer to the nature of human-made explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T10:32:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.