Contextualize Me -- The Case for Context in Reinforcement Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.04500v2
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 15:48:13 GMT
- Title: Contextualize Me -- The Case for Context in Reinforcement Learning
- Authors: Carolin Benjamins, Theresa Eimer, Frederik Schubert, Aditya Mohan,
Sebastian D\"ohler, Andr\'e Biedenkapp, Bodo Rosenhahn, Frank Hutter, Marius
Lindauer
- Abstract summary: Contextual Reinforcement Learning (cRL) provides a framework to model such changes in a principled manner.
We show how cRL contributes to improving zero-shot generalization in RL through meaningful benchmarks and structured reasoning about generalization tasks.
- Score: 49.794253971446416
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: While Reinforcement Learning ( RL) has made great strides towards solving
increasingly complicated problems, many algorithms are still brittle to even
slight environmental changes. Contextual Reinforcement Learning (cRL) provides
a framework to model such changes in a principled manner, thereby enabling
flexible, precise and interpretable task specification and generation. Our goal
is to show how the framework of cRL contributes to improving zero-shot
generalization in RL through meaningful benchmarks and structured reasoning
about generalization tasks. We confirm the insight that optimal behavior in cRL
requires context information, as in other related areas of partial
observability. To empirically validate this in the cRL framework, we provide
various context-extended versions of common RL environments. They are part of
the first benchmark library, CARL, designed for generalization based on cRL
extensions of popular benchmarks, which we propose as a testbed to further
study general agents. We show that in the contextual setting, even simple RL
environments become challenging - and that naive solutions are not enough to
generalize across complex context spaces.
Related papers
- Towards an Information Theoretic Framework of Context-Based Offline Meta-Reinforcement Learning [48.79569442193824]
We show that COMRL algorithms are essentially optimizing the same mutual information objective between the task variable $M$ and its latent representation $Z$ by implementing various approximate bounds.
This work lays the information theoretic foundation for COMRL methods, leading to a better understanding of task representation learning in the context of reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-04T09:58:42Z) - RL-ViGen: A Reinforcement Learning Benchmark for Visual Generalization [23.417092819516185]
We introduce RL-ViGen: a novel Reinforcement Learning Benchmark for Visual Generalization.
RL-ViGen contains diverse tasks and a wide spectrum of generalization types, thereby facilitating the derivation of more reliable conclusions.
Our aspiration is that RL-ViGen will serve as a catalyst in the future creation of universal visual generalization RL agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-15T05:45:37Z) - The Role of Diverse Replay for Generalisation in Reinforcement Learning [7.399291598113285]
We investigate the impact of the exploration strategy and replay buffer on generalisation in reinforcement learning.
We show that collecting and training on more diverse data from the training environments will improve zero-shot generalisation to new tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-09T07:48:36Z) - A Survey of Meta-Reinforcement Learning [69.76165430793571]
We cast the development of better RL algorithms as a machine learning problem itself in a process called meta-RL.
We discuss how, at a high level, meta-RL research can be clustered based on the presence of a task distribution and the learning budget available for each individual task.
We conclude by presenting the open problems on the path to making meta-RL part of the standard toolbox for a deep RL practitioner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-19T12:01:41Z) - Improving Zero-shot Generalization in Offline Reinforcement Learning
using Generalized Similarity Functions [34.843526573355746]
Reinforcement learning (RL) agents are widely used for solving complex sequential decision making tasks, but exhibit difficulty in generalizing to scenarios not seen during training.
We show that performance of online algorithms for generalization in RL can be hindered in the offline setting due to poor estimation of similarity between observations.
We propose a new theoretically-motivated framework called Generalized Similarity Functions (GSF), which uses contrastive learning to train an offline RL agent to aggregate observations based on the similarity of their expected future behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-29T15:42:54Z) - CARL: A Benchmark for Contextual and Adaptive Reinforcement Learning [45.52724876199729]
We present CARL, a collection of well-known RL environments extended to contextual RL problems.
We provide first evidence that disentangling representation learning of the states from the policy learning with the context facilitates better generalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-05T15:04:01Z) - When Is Generalizable Reinforcement Learning Tractable? [74.87383727210705]
We study the query complexity required to train RL agents that can generalize to multiple environments.
We introduce Strong Proximity, a structural condition which precisely characterizes the relative closeness of different environments.
We show that under a natural weakening of this condition, RL can require query complexity that is exponential in the horizon to generalize.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-01T19:08:24Z) - Dynamics Generalization via Information Bottleneck in Deep Reinforcement
Learning [90.93035276307239]
We propose an information theoretic regularization objective and an annealing-based optimization method to achieve better generalization ability in RL agents.
We demonstrate the extreme generalization benefits of our approach in different domains ranging from maze navigation to robotic tasks.
This work provides a principled way to improve generalization in RL by gradually removing information that is redundant for task-solving.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-03T02:24:20Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.