Case law retrieval: problems, methods, challenges and evaluations in the
last 20 years
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.07209v1
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 06:01:36 GMT
- Title: Case law retrieval: problems, methods, challenges and evaluations in the
last 20 years
- Authors: Daniel Locke and Guido Zuccon
- Abstract summary: We survey methods for case law retrieval from the past 20 years.
We outline the problems and challenges facing evaluation of case law retrieval systems going forward.
- Score: 23.13408774493739
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Case law retrieval is the retrieval of judicial decisions relevant to a legal
question. Case law retrieval comprises a significant amount of a lawyer's time,
and is important to ensure accurate advice and reduce workload. We survey
methods for case law retrieval from the past 20 years and outline the problems
and challenges facing evaluation of case law retrieval systems going forward.
Limited published work has focused on improving ranking in ad-hoc case law
retrieval. But there has been significant work in other areas of case law
retrieval, and legal information retrieval generally. This is likely due to
legal search providers being unwilling to give up the secrets of their success
to competitors. Most evaluations of case law retrieval have been undertaken on
small collections and focus on related tasks such as question-answer systems or
recommender systems. Work has not focused on Cranfield style evaluations and
baselines of methods for case law retrieval on publicly available test
collections are not present. This presents a major challenge going forward. But
there are reasons to question the extent of this problem, at least in a
commercial setting. Without test collections to baseline approaches it cannot
be known whether methods are promising. Works by commercial legal search
providers show the effectiveness of natural language systems as well as query
expansion for case law retrieval. Machine learning is being applied to more and
more legal search tasks, and undoubtedly this represents the future of case law
retrieval.
Related papers
- LawLLM: Law Large Language Model for the US Legal System [43.13850456765944]
We introduce the Law Large Language Model (LawLLM), a multi-task model specifically designed for the US legal domain.
LawLLM excels at Similar Case Retrieval (SCR), Precedent Case Recommendation (PCR), and Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP)
We propose customized data preprocessing techniques for each task that transform raw legal data into a trainable format.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-27T21:51:30Z) - Learning Interpretable Legal Case Retrieval via Knowledge-Guided Case Reformulation [22.85652668826498]
This paper introduces KELLER, a legal knowledge-guided case reformulation approach based on large language models (LLMs)
By incorporating professional legal knowledge about crimes and law articles, we enable large language models to accurately reformulate the original legal case into concise sub-facts of crimes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-28T08:59:45Z) - PILOT: Legal Case Outcome Prediction with Case Law [43.680862577060765]
We identify two unique challenges in making legal case outcome predictions with case law.
First, it is crucial to identify relevant precedent cases that serve as fundamental evidence for judges during decision-making.
Second, it is necessary to consider the evolution of legal principles over time, as early cases may adhere to different legal contexts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-28T21:18:05Z) - MUSER: A Multi-View Similar Case Retrieval Dataset [65.36779942237357]
Similar case retrieval (SCR) is a representative legal AI application that plays a pivotal role in promoting judicial fairness.
Existing SCR datasets only focus on the fact description section when judging the similarity between cases.
We present M, a similar case retrieval dataset based on multi-view similarity measurement and comprehensive legal element with sentence-level legal element annotations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T08:17:11Z) - An Intent Taxonomy of Legal Case Retrieval [43.22489520922202]
Legal case retrieval is a special Information Retrieval(IR) task focusing on legal case documents.
We present a novel hierarchical intent taxonomy of legal case retrieval.
We reveal significant differences in user behavior and satisfaction under different search intents in legal case retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-25T07:27:32Z) - SAILER: Structure-aware Pre-trained Language Model for Legal Case
Retrieval [75.05173891207214]
Legal case retrieval plays a core role in the intelligent legal system.
Most existing language models have difficulty understanding the long-distance dependencies between different structures.
We propose a new Structure-Aware pre-traIned language model for LEgal case Retrieval.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-22T10:47:01Z) - Legal Element-oriented Modeling with Multi-view Contrastive Learning for
Legal Case Retrieval [3.909749182759558]
We propose an interaction-focused network for legal case retrieval with a multi-view contrastive learning objective.
Case-view contrastive learning minimizes the hidden space distance between relevant legal case representations.
We employ a legal element knowledge-aware indicator to detect legal elements of cases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-11T06:47:23Z) - What About the Precedent: An Information-Theoretic Analysis of Common
Law [64.49276556192073]
In common law, the outcome of a new case is determined mostly by precedent cases, rather than existing statutes.
We are the first to approach this question by comparing two longstanding jurisprudential views.
We find that the precedent's arguments share 0.38 nats of information with the case's outcome, whereas precedent's facts only share 0.18 nats of information.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-25T11:20:09Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.