Is the relativistic Structure of Spacetime Ontic or Epistemic?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.09261v1
• Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 19:14:36 GMT
• Title: Is the relativistic Structure of Spacetime Ontic or Epistemic?
• Authors: Edward J. Gillis
• Abstract summary: We argue that Bell's nonlocal correlations cannot readily be explained within the standard relativistic framework. This suggests that we should re-examine our understanding of spacetime.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As repeatedly emphasized by Einstein our knowledge of the structure of space and time is based entirely on inferences from observations of physical objects and processes. At the most fundamental level these objects and processes are described by quantum theory. However, the ontological status of the theoretical entities employed by quantum theory is a matter of considerable debate. Furthermore, the nonlocal correlations identified by Bell cannot readily be explained within the standard relativistic framework. This suggests that we should re-examine our understanding of spacetime.

Related papers

• Fundamental limits for realising quantum processes in spacetime [1.7802147489386633]
  We derive no-go theorems for quantum experiments realisable in classical background spacetimes. Our first theorem implies that realisations of ICO processes that do not violate relativistic causality must involve the non-localization of systems in spacetime. The second theorem shows that for any such realisation of an ICO process, there exists a more fine-grained description in terms of a definite and acyclic causal order process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T21:41:49Z)
• Is Planckian discreteness observable in cosmology? [47.03992469282679]
  A Planck scale inflationary era produces the scale invariant spectrum of inhomogeneities with very small tensor-to-scalar ratio of perturbations. Here we evoke the possibility that some of the major puzzles in cosmology would have an explanation rooted in quantum gravity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-21T06:53:37Z)
• Relaxation of first-class constraints and the quantization of gauge theories: from "matter without matter" to the reappearance of time in quantum gravity [72.27323884094953]
  We make a conceptual overview of an approach to the initial-value problem in canonical gauge theories. We stress how the first-class phase-space constraints may be relaxed if we interpret them as fixing the values of new degrees of freedom.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T19:00:02Z)
• Quantum Mechanical Reality: Entanglement and Decoherence [0.0]
  We look into the ontology of quantum theory as distinct from that of the classical theory in the sciences. Within this framework, theories are conceptual constructs applying to models generated in the phenomenal world within limited contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-22T19:08:00Z)
• Emergence of Quantum Theory and Minkowski Spacetime [0.0]
  We show that quantum theory and Minkowski spacetime may connect with each other and emerge from a single fundamental entity. We show that quantum theory and Minkowski spacetime may connect with each other and emerge from a single fundamental entity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-12T01:51:05Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Is spacetime quantum? [0.0]
  We show a theorem stating that spacetime degrees of freedom and a quantum system violate a Bell inequality in a background Minkowski spacetime. We argue that this implies that spacetime cannot be sensibly called classical if the assumptions in our theorem hold.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-06T17:13:51Z)
• Time and Evolution in Quantum and Classical Cosmology [68.8204255655161]
  We show that it is neither necessary nor sufficient for the Poisson bracket between the time variable and the super-Hamiltonian to be equal to unity in all of the phase space. We also discuss the question of switching between different internal times as well as the Montevideo interpretation of quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-02T09:17:55Z)
• Wavefunctions and Minkowski Space-Time: On the Reconciliation of Quantum Theory with Special Relativity [0.0]
  The implications of the relativistic space-time structure for a physical description by quantum mechanical wave-functions are investigated. An analysis of the wave-function alone does not suffice to answer the question of relativistic compatibility of the theory. The actual events in space time, which are predicted and described by the theory, are crucial.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-29T17:59:28Z)
• Quantum Hall phase emerging in an array of atoms interacting with photons [101.18253437732933]
  Topological quantum phases underpin many concepts of modern physics. Here, we reveal that the quantum Hall phase with topological edge states, spectral Landau levels and Hofstadter butterfly can emerge in a simple quantum system. Such systems, arrays of two-level atoms (qubits) coupled to light being described by the classical Dicke model, have recently been realized in experiments with cold atoms and superconducting qubits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-18T14:56:39Z)
• Projection evolution and quantum spacetime [68.8204255655161]
  We discuss the problem of time in quantum mechanics. An idea of construction of a quantum spacetime as a special set of the allowed states is presented. An example of a structureless quantum Minkowski-like spacetime is also considered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-10-24T14:54:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.