Multi-fidelity reinforcement learning framework for shape optimization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.11170v1
• Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 20:44:04 GMT
• Title: Multi-fidelity reinforcement learning framework for shape optimization
• Authors: Sahil Bhola, Suraj Pawar, Prasanna Balaprakash, Romit Maulik
• Abstract summary: We introduce a controlled transfer learning framework that leverages a multi-fidelity simulation setting. Our strategy is deployed for an airfoil shape optimization problem at high Reynolds numbers. Our results demonstrate this framework's applicability to other scientific DRL scenarios.
• Score: 0.8258451067861933
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) is a promising outer-loop intelligence paradigm which can deploy problem solving strategies for complex tasks. Consequently, DRL has been utilized for several scientific applications, specifically in cases where classical optimization or control methods are limited. One key limitation of conventional DRL methods is their episode-hungry nature which proves to be a bottleneck for tasks which involve costly evaluations of a numerical forward model. In this article, we address this limitation of DRL by introducing a controlled transfer learning framework that leverages a multi-fidelity simulation setting. Our strategy is deployed for an airfoil shape optimization problem at high Reynolds numbers, where our framework can learn an optimal policy for generating efficient airfoil shapes by gathering knowledge from multi-fidelity environments and reduces computational costs by over 30\%. Furthermore, our formulation promotes policy exploration and generalization to new environments, thereby preventing over-fitting to data from solely one fidelity. Our results demonstrate this framework's applicability to other scientific DRL scenarios where multi-fidelity environments can be used for policy learning.

Related papers

• DPO: Differential reinforcement learning with application to optimal configuration search [3.2857981869020327]
  Reinforcement learning with continuous state and action spaces remains one of the most challenging problems within the field. We propose the first differential RL framework that can handle settings with limited training samples and short-length episodes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T03:11:12Z)
• Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint [56.74058752955209]
  This paper studies the alignment process of generative models with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) We first identify the primary challenges of existing popular methods like offline PPO and offline DPO as lacking in strategical exploration of the environment. We propose efficient algorithms with finite-sample theoretical guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T18:58:42Z)
• Hybrid Reinforcement Learning for Optimizing Pump Sustainability in Real-World Water Distribution Networks [55.591662978280894]
  This article addresses the pump-scheduling optimization problem to enhance real-time control of real-world water distribution networks (WDNs) Our primary objectives are to adhere to physical operational constraints while reducing energy consumption and operational costs. Traditional optimization techniques, such as evolution-based and genetic algorithms, often fall short due to their lack of convergence guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T21:26:16Z)
• Reparameterized Policy Learning for Multimodal Trajectory Optimization [61.13228961771765]
  We investigate the challenge of parametrizing policies for reinforcement learning in high-dimensional continuous action spaces. We propose a principled framework that models the continuous RL policy as a generative model of optimal trajectories. We present a practical model-based RL method, which leverages the multimodal policy parameterization and learned world model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T09:05:46Z)
• Robust optimal well control using an adaptive multi-grid reinforcement learning framework [0.0]
  Reinforcement learning is a promising tool to solve robust optimal well control problems. The proposed framework is demonstrated using a state-of-the-art, model-free policy-based RL algorithm. Prominent gains in the computational efficiency is observed using the proposed framework saving around 60-70% of computational cost of its single fine-grid counterpart.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-07T12:08:57Z)
• Jump-Start Reinforcement Learning [68.82380421479675]
  We present a meta algorithm that can use offline data, demonstrations, or a pre-existing policy to initialize an RL policy. In particular, we propose Jump-Start Reinforcement Learning (JSRL), an algorithm that employs two policies to solve tasks. We show via experiments that JSRL is able to significantly outperform existing imitation and reinforcement learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-05T17:25:22Z)
• Towards Deployment-Efficient Reinforcement Learning: Lower Bound and Optimality [141.89413461337324]
  Deployment efficiency is an important criterion for many real-world applications of reinforcement learning (RL) We propose a theoretical formulation for deployment-efficient RL (DE-RL) from an "optimization with constraints" perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-14T01:31:46Z)
• Learning Off-Policy with Online Planning [18.63424441772675]
  We investigate a novel instantiation of H-step lookahead with a learned model and a terminal value function. We show the flexibility of LOOP to incorporate safety constraints during deployment with a set of navigation environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-23T16:18:44Z)
• Guided Constrained Policy Optimization for Dynamic Quadrupedal Robot Locomotion [78.46388769788405]
  We introduce guided constrained policy optimization (GCPO), an RL framework based upon our implementation of constrained policy optimization (CPPO) We show that guided constrained RL offers faster convergence close to the desired optimum resulting in an optimal, yet physically feasible, robotic control behavior without the need for precise reward function tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-22T10:15:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.