Explainable Machine Learning for Predicting Homicide Clearance in the United States

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.04768v1
• Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 14:35:12 GMT
• Title: Explainable Machine Learning for Predicting Homicide Clearance in the United States
• Authors: Gian Maria Campedelli
• Abstract summary: This study explores the potential of Explainable Machine Learning in the prediction and detection of drivers of cleared homicides at the national- and state-levels in the United States. Nine algorithmic approaches are compared to assess the best performance in predicting cleared homicides country-wise. The most accurate algorithm among all (XGBoost) is then used for predicting clearance outcomes state-wise.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Purpose: To explore the potential of Explainable Machine Learning in the prediction and detection of drivers of cleared homicides at the national- and state-levels in the United States. Methods: First, nine algorithmic approaches are compared to assess the best performance in predicting cleared homicides country-wise, using data from the Murder Accountability Project. The most accurate algorithm among all (XGBoost) is then used for predicting clearance outcomes state-wise. Second, SHAP, a framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence, is employed to capture the most important features in explaining clearance patterns both at the national and state levels. Results: At the national level, XGBoost demonstrates to achieve the best performance overall. Substantial predictive variability is detected state-wise. In terms of explainability, SHAP highlights the relevance of several features in consistently predicting investigation outcomes. These include homicide circumstances, weapons, victims' sex and race, as well as number of involved offenders and victims. Conclusions: Explainable Machine Learning demonstrates to be a helpful framework for predicting homicide clearance. SHAP outcomes suggest a more organic integration of the two theoretical perspectives emerged in the literature. Furthermore, jurisdictional heterogeneity highlights the importance of developing ad hoc state-level strategies to improve police performance in clearing homicides.

Related papers

• Machine Learning for Public Good: Predicting Urban Crime Patterns to Enhance Community Safety [0.0]
  This paper explores the effectiveness of ML techniques to predict spatial and temporal patterns of crimes in urban areas. Research goal is to achieve a high degree of accuracy in categorizing calls into priority levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T02:07:14Z)
• Evaluating Human Alignment and Model Faithfulness of LLM Rationale [66.75309523854476]
  We study how well large language models (LLMs) explain their generations through rationales. We show that prompting-based methods are less "faithful" than attribution-based explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T20:06:30Z)
• CrimeAlarm: Towards Intensive Intent Dynamics in Fine-grained Crime Prediction [18.978423228112856]
  This paper proposes a fine-grained sequential crime prediction framework, CrimeAlarm, that equips with a novel mutual distillation strategy inspired by curriculum learning. Experiments show that CrimeAlarm outperforms state-of-the-art methods in terms of NDCG@5, with improvements of 4.51% for the NYC16 and 7.73% for the CHI18 in accuracy measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T05:44:28Z)
• Rationalizing Predictions by Adversarial Information Calibration [65.19407304154177]
  We train two models jointly: one is a typical neural model that solves the task at hand in an accurate but black-box manner, and the other is a selector-predictor model that additionally produces a rationale for its prediction. We use an adversarial technique to calibrate the information extracted by the two models such that the difference between them is an indicator of the missed or over-selected features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-15T03:13:09Z)
• Exploiting Contrastive Learning and Numerical Evidence for Confusing Legal Judgment Prediction [46.71918729837462]
  Given the fact description text of a legal case, legal judgment prediction aims to predict the case's charge, law article and penalty term. Previous studies fail to distinguish different classification errors with a standard cross-entropy classification loss. We propose a moco-based supervised contrastive learning to learn distinguishable representations. We further enhance the representation of the fact description with extracted crime amounts which are encoded by a pre-trained numeracy model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-15T15:53:56Z)
• Using attention methods to predict judicial outcomes [0.0]
  We have used AI classifiers to predict judicial outcomes in the Brazilian legal system. These texts formed a dataset of second-degree murder and active corruption cases. Our research showed that Regression Trees, Gated Recurring Units and Hierarchical Attention Networks presented higher metrics for different subsets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-18T16:24:34Z)
• Open Vocabulary Object Detection with Proposal Mining and Prediction Equalization [73.14053674836838]
  Open-vocabulary object detection (OVD) aims to scale up vocabulary size to detect objects of novel categories beyond the training vocabulary. Recent work resorts to the rich knowledge in pre-trained vision-language models. We present MEDet, a novel OVD framework with proposal mining and prediction equalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-22T14:30:41Z)
• Spatial-Temporal Hypergraph Self-Supervised Learning for Crime Prediction [60.508960752148454]
  This work proposes a Spatial-Temporal Hypergraph Self-Supervised Learning framework to tackle the label scarcity issue in crime prediction. We propose the cross-region hypergraph structure learning to encode region-wise crime dependency under the entire urban space. We also design the dual-stage self-supervised learning paradigm, to not only jointly capture local- and global-level spatial-temporal crime patterns, but also supplement the sparse crime representation by augmenting region self-discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-18T23:46:01Z)
• Everything Has a Cause: Leveraging Causal Inference in Legal Text Analysis [62.44432226563088]
  Causal inference is the process of capturing cause-effect relationship among variables. We propose a novel Graph-based Causal Inference framework, which builds causal graphs from fact descriptions without much human involvement. We observe that the causal knowledge contained in GCI can be effectively injected into powerful neural networks for better performance and interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-19T16:13:10Z)
• A Comparative Study on Crime in Denver City Based on Machine Learning and Data Mining [0.0]
  I analyzed a real-world crime and accident dataset of Denver county, USA, from January 2014 to May 2019. This project aims to predict and highlights the trends of occurrence that will, in return, support the law enforcement agencies and government to discover the preventive measures. The outcomes are captured using two popular test methods: train-test split, and k-fold crossvalidation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-09T01:36:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.