A Comparative Study on Forecasting of Retail Sales
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.06848v1
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 04:24:29 GMT
- Title: A Comparative Study on Forecasting of Retail Sales
- Authors: Md Rashidul Hasan, Muntasir A Kabir, Rezoan A Shuvro, and Pankaz Das
- Abstract summary: We benchmark forecasting models on historical sales data from Walmart to predict their future sales.
We apply these models on the forecasting challenge dataset (M5 forecasting by Kaggle)
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Predicting product sales of large retail companies is a challenging task
considering volatile nature of trends, seasonalities, events as well as unknown
factors such as market competitions, change in customer's preferences, or
unforeseen events, e.g., COVID-19 outbreak. In this paper, we benchmark
forecasting models on historical sales data from Walmart to predict their
future sales. We provide a comprehensive theoretical overview and analysis of
the state-of-the-art timeseries forecasting models. Then, we apply these models
on the forecasting challenge dataset (M5 forecasting by Kaggle). Specifically,
we use a traditional model, namely, ARIMA (Autoregressive Integrated Moving
Average), and recently developed advanced models e.g., Prophet model developed
by Facebook, light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) model developed by
Microsoft and benchmark their performances. Results suggest that ARIMA model
outperforms the Facebook Prophet and LightGBM model while the LightGBM model
achieves huge computational gain for the large dataset with negligible
compromise in the prediction accuracy.
Related papers
- Learning Augmentation Policies from A Model Zoo for Time Series Forecasting [58.66211334969299]
We introduce AutoTSAug, a learnable data augmentation method based on reinforcement learning.
By augmenting the marginal samples with a learnable policy, AutoTSAug substantially improves forecasting performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-10T07:34:19Z) - F-FOMAML: GNN-Enhanced Meta-Learning for Peak Period Demand Forecasting with Proxy Data [65.6499834212641]
We formulate the demand prediction as a meta-learning problem and develop the Feature-based First-Order Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (F-FOMAML) algorithm.
By considering domain similarities through task-specific metadata, our model improved generalization, where the excess risk decreases as the number of training tasks increases.
Compared to existing state-of-the-art models, our method demonstrates a notable improvement in demand prediction accuracy, reducing the Mean Absolute Error by 26.24% on an internal vending machine dataset and by 1.04% on the publicly accessible JD.com dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-23T21:28:50Z) - Predictive Churn with the Set of Good Models [64.05949860750235]
We study the effect of conflicting predictions over the set of near-optimal machine learning models.
We present theoretical results on the expected churn between models within the Rashomon set.
We show how our approach can be used to better anticipate, reduce, and avoid churn in consumer-facing applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-12T16:15:25Z) - ExtremeCast: Boosting Extreme Value Prediction for Global Weather Forecast [57.6987191099507]
We introduce Exloss, a novel loss function that performs asymmetric optimization and highlights extreme values to obtain accurate extreme weather forecast.
We also introduce ExBooster, which captures the uncertainty in prediction outcomes by employing multiple random samples.
Our solution can achieve state-of-the-art performance in extreme weather prediction, while maintaining the overall forecast accuracy comparable to the top medium-range forecast models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-02T10:34:13Z) - Back2Future: Leveraging Backfill Dynamics for Improving Real-time
Predictions in Future [73.03458424369657]
In real-time forecasting in public health, data collection is a non-trivial and demanding task.
'Backfill' phenomenon and its effect on model performance has been barely studied in the prior literature.
We formulate a novel problem and neural framework Back2Future that aims to refine a given model's predictions in real-time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-08T14:48:20Z) - Comparing Test Sets with Item Response Theory [53.755064720563]
We evaluate 29 datasets using predictions from 18 pretrained Transformer models on individual test examples.
We find that Quoref, HellaSwag, and MC-TACO are best suited for distinguishing among state-of-the-art models.
We also observe span selection task format, which is used for QA datasets like QAMR or SQuAD2.0, is effective in differentiating between strong and weak models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-01T22:33:53Z) - A Time Series Analysis-Based Stock Price Prediction Using Machine
Learning and Deep Learning Models [0.0]
We present a very robust and accurate framework of stock price prediction that consists of an agglomeration of statistical, machine learning and deep learning models.
We use the daily stock price data, collected at five minutes interval of time, of a very well known company that is listed in the National Stock Exchange (NSE) of India.
We contend that the agglomerative approach of model building that uses a combination of statistical, machine learning, and deep learning approaches, can very effectively learn from the volatile and random movement patterns in a stock price data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-17T19:41:22Z) - Profit-oriented sales forecasting: a comparison of forecasting
techniques from a business perspective [3.613072342189595]
This paper compares a large array of techniques for 35 times series that consist of both industry data from the Coca-Cola Company and publicly available datasets.
It introduces a novel and completely automated profit-driven approach that takes into account the expected profit that a technique can create during both the model building and evaluation process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-03T14:50:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.