The Efficacy of Pessimism in Asynchronous Q-Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.07368v1
• Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 17:59:01 GMT
• Title: The Efficacy of Pessimism in Asynchronous Q-Learning
• Authors: Yuling Yan, Gen Li, Yuxin Chen, Jianqing Fan
• Abstract summary: We develop an algorithmic framework that incorporates the principle of pessimism into asynchronous Q-learning. This framework leads to, among other things, improved sample efficiency and enhanced adaptivity in the presence of near-expert data. Our results deliver the first theoretical support for the use of pessimism principle in the presence of Markovian non-i.i.d. data.
• Score: 17.193902915070506
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper is concerned with the asynchronous form of Q-learning, which applies a stochastic approximation scheme to Markovian data samples. Motivated by the recent advances in offline reinforcement learning, we develop an algorithmic framework that incorporates the principle of pessimism into asynchronous Q-learning, which penalizes infrequently-visited state-action pairs based on suitable lower confidence bounds (LCBs). This framework leads to, among other things, improved sample efficiency and enhanced adaptivity in the presence of near-expert data. Our approach permits the observed data in some important scenarios to cover only partial state-action space, which is in stark contrast to prior theory that requires uniform coverage of all state-action pairs. When coupled with the idea of variance reduction, asynchronous Q-learning with LCB penalization achieves near-optimal sample complexity, provided that the target accuracy level is small enough. In comparison, prior works were suboptimal in terms of the dependency on the effective horizon even when i.i.d. sampling is permitted. Our results deliver the first theoretical support for the use of pessimism principle in the presence of Markovian non-i.i.d. data.

Related papers

• Online Statistical Inference for Time-varying Sample-averaged Q-learning [2.2374171443798034]
  This paper introduces a time-varying batch-averaged Q-learning, termed sampleaveraged Q-learning. We develop a novel framework that provides insights into the normality of the sample-averaged algorithm under mild conditions. Numerical experiments conducted on classic OpenAI Gym environments show that the time-varying sample-averaged Q-learning method consistently outperforms both single-sample and constant-batch Q-learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T17:17:19Z)
• Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: Data Coverage and Algorithmic Techniques [65.55451717632317]
  We study Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (MARLHF), exploring both theoretical foundations and empirical validations. We define the task as identifying Nash equilibrium from a preference-only offline dataset in general-sum games. Our findings underscore the multifaceted approach required for MARLHF, paving the way for effective preference-based multi-agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-01T13:14:41Z)
• SimPro: A Simple Probabilistic Framework Towards Realistic Long-Tailed Semi-Supervised Learning [49.94607673097326]
  We propose a highly adaptable framework, designated as SimPro, which does not rely on any predefined assumptions about the distribution of unlabeled data. Our framework, grounded in a probabilistic model, innovatively refines the expectation-maximization algorithm. Our method showcases consistent state-of-the-art performance across diverse benchmarks and data distribution scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T03:39:04Z)
• MaxMatch: Semi-Supervised Learning with Worst-Case Consistency [149.03760479533855]
  We propose a worst-case consistency regularization technique for semi-supervised learning (SSL) We present a generalization bound for SSL consisting of the empirical loss terms observed on labeled and unlabeled training data separately. Motivated by this bound, we derive an SSL objective that minimizes the largest inconsistency between an original unlabeled sample and its multiple augmented variants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-26T12:04:49Z)
• A novel Deep Learning approach for one-step Conformal Prediction approximation [0.7646713951724009]
  Conformal Prediction (CP) is a versatile solution that guarantees a maximum error rate given minimal constraints. We propose a novel conformal loss function that approximates the traditionally two-step CP approach in a single step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-25T17:46:09Z)
• Pessimistic Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning: Towards Optimal Sample Complexity [51.476337785345436]
  We study a pessimistic variant of Q-learning in the context of finite-horizon Markov decision processes. A variance-reduced pessimistic Q-learning algorithm is proposed to achieve near-optimal sample complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-28T15:39:36Z)
• Pessimistic Minimax Value Iteration: Provably Efficient Equilibrium Learning from Offline Datasets [101.5329678997916]
  We study episodic two-player zero-sum Markov games (MGs) in the offline setting. The goal is to find an approximate Nash equilibrium (NE) policy pair based on a dataset collected a priori.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-15T15:39:30Z)
• Learning Prediction Intervals for Regression: Generalization and Calibration [12.576284277353606]
  We study the generation of prediction intervals in regression for uncertainty quantification. We use a general learning theory to characterize the optimality-feasibility tradeoff that encompasses Lipschitz continuity and VC-subgraph classes. We empirically demonstrate the strengths of our interval generation and calibration algorithms in terms of testing performances compared to existing benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-26T17:55:30Z)
• Finite Sample Analysis of Minimax Offline Reinforcement Learning: Completeness, Fast Rates and First-Order Efficiency [83.02999769628593]
  We offer a theoretical characterization of off-policy evaluation (OPE) in reinforcement learning. We show that the minimax approach enables us to achieve a fast rate of convergence for weights and quality functions. We present the first finite-sample result with first-order efficiency in non-tabular environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-05T03:20:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.