Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: Data Coverage and Algorithmic Techniques

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.00717v2
• Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 15:50:40 GMT
• Title: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: Data Coverage and Algorithmic Techniques
• Authors: Natalia Zhang, Xinqi Wang, Qiwen Cui, Runlong Zhou, Sham M. Kakade, Simon S. Du,
• Abstract summary: We study Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (MARLHF), exploring both theoretical foundations and empirical validations. We define the task as identifying Nash equilibrium from a preference-only offline dataset in general-sum games. Our findings underscore the multifaceted approach required for MARLHF, paving the way for effective preference-based multi-agent systems.
• Score: 65.55451717632317
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: We initiate the study of Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (MARLHF), exploring both theoretical foundations and empirical validations. We define the task as identifying Nash equilibrium from a preference-only offline dataset in general-sum games, a problem marked by the challenge of sparse feedback signals. Our theory establishes the upper complexity bounds for Nash Equilibrium in effective MARLHF, demonstrating that single-policy coverage is inadequate and highlighting the importance of unilateral dataset coverage. These theoretical insights are verified through comprehensive experiments. To enhance the practical performance, we further introduce two algorithmic techniques. (1) We propose a Mean Squared Error (MSE) regularization along the time axis to achieve a more uniform reward distribution and improve reward learning outcomes. (2) We utilize imitation learning to approximate the reference policy, ensuring stability and effectiveness in training. Our findings underscore the multifaceted approach required for MARLHF, paving the way for effective preference-based multi-agent systems.

Related papers

• Enhancing Fairness through Reweighting: A Path to Attain the Sufficiency Rule [23.335423207588466]
  We introduce an innovative approach to enhancing the empirical risk minimization process in model training. This scheme aims to uphold the sufficiency rule in fairness by ensuring that optimal predictors maintain consistency across diverse sub-groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-26T09:19:58Z)
• Joint Demonstration and Preference Learning Improves Policy Alignment with Human Feedback [58.049113055986375]
  We develop a single stage approach named Alignment with Integrated Human Feedback (AIHF) to train reward models and the policy. The proposed approach admits a suite of efficient algorithms, which can easily reduce to, and leverage, popular alignment algorithms. We demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed solutions with extensive experiments involving alignment problems in LLMs and robotic control problems in MuJoCo.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T01:20:53Z)
• Finite-Time Convergence and Sample Complexity of Actor-Critic Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning [20.491176017183044]
  This paper tackles the multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL) problem. It introduces an innovative actor-critic algorithm named MOAC which finds a policy by iteratively making trade-offs among conflicting reward signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-05T23:52:57Z)
• Pessimistic Causal Reinforcement Learning with Mediators for Confounded Offline Data [17.991833729722288]
  We propose a novel policy learning algorithm, PESsimistic CAusal Learning (PESCAL) Our key observation is that, by incorporating auxiliary variables that mediate the effect of actions on system dynamics, it is sufficient to learn a lower bound of the mediator distribution function, instead of the Q-function. We provide theoretical guarantees for the algorithms we propose, and demonstrate their efficacy through simulations, as well as real-world experiments utilizing offline datasets from a leading ride-hailing platform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T14:51:19Z)
• Doubly Robust Instance-Reweighted Adversarial Training [107.40683655362285]
  We propose a novel doubly-robust instance reweighted adversarial framework. Our importance weights are obtained by optimizing the KL-divergence regularized loss function. Our proposed approach outperforms related state-of-the-art baseline methods in terms of average robust performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-01T06:16:18Z)
• Mimicking Better by Matching the Approximate Action Distribution [48.95048003354255]
  We introduce MAAD, a novel, sample-efficient on-policy algorithm for Imitation Learning from Observations. We show that it requires considerable fewer interactions to achieve expert performance, outperforming current state-of-the-art on-policy methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-16T12:43:47Z)
• Federated Compositional Deep AUC Maximization [58.25078060952361]
  We develop a novel federated learning method for imbalanced data by directly optimizing the area under curve (AUC) score. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to achieve such favorable theoretical results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T05:49:41Z)
• Deterministic and Discriminative Imitation (D2-Imitation): Revisiting Adversarial Imitation for Sample Efficiency [61.03922379081648]
  We propose an off-policy sample efficient approach that requires no adversarial training or min-max optimization. Our empirical results show that D2-Imitation is effective in achieving good sample efficiency, outperforming several off-policy extension approaches of adversarial imitation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-11T19:36:19Z)
• Off-Policy Imitation Learning from Observations [78.30794935265425]
  Learning from Observations (LfO) is a practical reinforcement learning scenario from which many applications can benefit. We propose a sample-efficient LfO approach that enables off-policy optimization in a principled manner. Our approach is comparable with state-of-the-art locomotion in terms of both sample-efficiency and performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-25T21:33:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.