Pessimistic Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning: Towards
Optimal Sample Complexity
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.13890v1
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 15:39:36 GMT
- Title: Pessimistic Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning: Towards
Optimal Sample Complexity
- Authors: Laixi Shi, Gen Li, Yuting Wei, Yuxin Chen, Yuejie Chi
- Abstract summary: We study a pessimistic variant of Q-learning in the context of finite-horizon Markov decision processes.
A variance-reduced pessimistic Q-learning algorithm is proposed to achieve near-optimal sample complexity.
- Score: 51.476337785345436
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Offline or batch reinforcement learning seeks to learn a near-optimal policy
using history data without active exploration of the environment. To counter
the insufficient coverage and sample scarcity of many offline datasets, the
principle of pessimism has been recently introduced to mitigate high bias of
the estimated values. While pessimistic variants of model-based algorithms
(e.g., value iteration with lower confidence bounds) have been theoretically
investigated, their model-free counterparts -- which do not require explicit
model estimation -- have not been adequately studied, especially in terms of
sample efficiency. To address this inadequacy, we study a pessimistic variant
of Q-learning in the context of finite-horizon Markov decision processes, and
characterize its sample complexity under the single-policy concentrability
assumption which does not require the full coverage of the state-action space.
In addition, a variance-reduced pessimistic Q-learning algorithm is proposed to
achieve near-optimal sample complexity. Altogether, this work highlights the
efficiency of model-free algorithms in offline RL when used in conjunction with
pessimism and variance reduction.
Related papers
- Sample Complexity of Offline Distributionally Robust Linear Markov Decision Processes [37.15580574143281]
offline reinforcement learning (RL)
This paper considers the sample complexity of distributionally robust linear Markov decision processes (MDPs) with an uncertainty set characterized by the total variation distance using offline data.
We develop a pessimistic model-based algorithm and establish its sample complexity bound under minimal data coverage assumptions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-19T17:48:42Z) - Uncertainty-Aware Instance Reweighting for Off-Policy Learning [63.31923483172859]
We propose a Uncertainty-aware Inverse Propensity Score estimator (UIPS) for improved off-policy learning.
Experiment results on synthetic and three real-world recommendation datasets demonstrate the advantageous sample efficiency of the proposed UIPS estimator.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-11T11:42:26Z) - Offline Reinforcement Learning with Instrumental Variables in Confounded
Markov Decision Processes [93.61202366677526]
We study the offline reinforcement learning (RL) in the face of unmeasured confounders.
We propose various policy learning methods with the finite-sample suboptimality guarantee of finding the optimal in-class policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-18T22:03:55Z) - Distributionally Robust Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with
Near-Optimal Sample Complexity [39.886149789339335]
offline reinforcement learning aims to learn to perform decision making from history data without active exploration.
Due to uncertainties and variabilities of the environment, it is critical to learn a robust policy that performs well even when the deployed environment deviates from the nominal one used to collect the history dataset.
We consider a distributionally robust formulation of offline RL, focusing on robust Markov decision processes with an uncertainty set specified by the Kullback-Leibler divergence in both finite-horizon and infinite-horizon settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-11T11:55:31Z) - Model-based Offline Imitation Learning with Non-expert Data [7.615595533111191]
We propose a scalable model-based offline imitation learning algorithmic framework that leverages datasets collected by both suboptimal and optimal policies.
We show that the proposed method textitalways outperforms Behavioral Cloning in the low data regime on simulated continuous control domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-11T13:08:08Z) - The Efficacy of Pessimism in Asynchronous Q-Learning [17.193902915070506]
We develop an algorithmic framework that incorporates the principle of pessimism into asynchronous Q-learning.
This framework leads to, among other things, improved sample efficiency and enhanced adaptivity in the presence of near-expert data.
Our results deliver the first theoretical support for the use of pessimism principle in the presence of Markovian non-i.i.d. data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-14T17:59:01Z) - Pessimistic Minimax Value Iteration: Provably Efficient Equilibrium
Learning from Offline Datasets [101.5329678997916]
We study episodic two-player zero-sum Markov games (MGs) in the offline setting.
The goal is to find an approximate Nash equilibrium (NE) policy pair based on a dataset collected a priori.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-15T15:39:30Z) - COMBO: Conservative Offline Model-Based Policy Optimization [120.55713363569845]
Uncertainty estimation with complex models, such as deep neural networks, can be difficult and unreliable.
We develop a new model-based offline RL algorithm, COMBO, that regularizes the value function on out-of-support state-actions.
We find that COMBO consistently performs as well or better as compared to prior offline model-free and model-based methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-16T18:50:32Z) - Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL? [104.00628430454479]
We study offline reinforcement learning (RL), which aims to learn an optimal policy based on a dataset collected a priori.
We propose a pessimistic variant of the value iteration algorithm (PEVI), which incorporates an uncertainty quantifier as the penalty function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-30T09:06:57Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.