Strategic Maneuver and Disruption with Reinforcement Learning Approaches for Multi-Agent Coordination

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.09565v1
• Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 19:02:18 GMT
• Title: Strategic Maneuver and Disruption with Reinforcement Learning Approaches for Multi-Agent Coordination
• Authors: Derrik E. Asher, Anjon Basak, Rolando Fernandez, Piyush K. Sharma, Erin G. Zaroukian, Christopher D. Hsu, Michael R. Dorothy, Thomas Mahre, Gerardo Galindo, Luke Frerichs, John Rogers, and John Fossaceca
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning (RL) approaches can illuminate emergent behaviors that facilitate coordination across teams of agents. One promising avenue for implementing strategic maneuver and disruption to gain superiority is through coordination of MAS in future military operations.
• Score: 1.0651507097431494
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) approaches can illuminate emergent behaviors that facilitate coordination across teams of agents as part of a multi-agent system (MAS), which can provide windows of opportunity in various military tasks. Technologically advancing adversaries pose substantial risks to a friendly nation's interests and resources. Superior resources alone are not enough to defeat adversaries in modern complex environments because adversaries create standoff in multiple domains against predictable military doctrine-based maneuvers. Therefore, as part of a defense strategy, friendly forces must use strategic maneuvers and disruption to gain superiority in complex multi-faceted domains such as multi-domain operations (MDO). One promising avenue for implementing strategic maneuver and disruption to gain superiority over adversaries is through coordination of MAS in future military operations. In this paper, we present overviews of prominent works in the RL domain with their strengths and weaknesses for overcoming the challenges associated with performing autonomous strategic maneuver and disruption in military contexts.

Related papers

• Reinforcement Learning for Decision-Level Interception Prioritization in Drone Swarm Defense [56.47577824219207]
  We present a case study demonstrating the practical advantages of reinforcement learning in addressing this challenge.<n>We introduce a high-fidelity simulation environment that captures realistic operational constraints.<n>Agent learns to coordinate multiple effectors for optimal interception prioritization.<n>We evaluate the learned policy against a handcrafted rule-based baseline across hundreds of simulated attack scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T13:55:39Z)
• Explaining Strategic Decisions in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Aerial Combat Tactics [40.06500618820166]
  Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) enables coordination among autonomous agents in complex scenarios.<n>MARL's practical deployment in sensitive military contexts is constrained by the lack of explainability.<n>This work reviews and assesses current advances in explainability methods for MARL with a focus on simulated air combat scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-16T14:36:30Z)
• Superintelligence Strategy: Expert Version [64.7113737051525]
  Destabilizing AI developments could raise the odds of great-power conflict. Superintelligence -- AI vastly better than humans at nearly all cognitive tasks -- is now anticipated by AI researchers. We introduce the concept of Mutual Assured AI Malfunction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T17:53:24Z)
• EPO: Explicit Policy Optimization for Strategic Reasoning in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning [69.55982246413046]
  We propose explicit policy optimization (EPO) for strategic reasoning. EPO provides strategies in open-ended action space and can be plugged into arbitrary LLM agents to motivate goal-directed behavior. Experiments across social and physical domains demonstrate EPO's ability of long-term goal alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T03:15:55Z)
• Hierarchical Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning for Cyber Network Defense [7.967738380932909]
  We propose a hierarchical Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) architecture that decomposes the cyber defense task into specific sub-tasks like network investigation and host recovery. Our approach involves training sub-policies for each sub-task using PPO enhanced with domain expertise. These sub-policies are then leveraged by a master defense policy that coordinates their selection to solve complex network defense tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T18:35:05Z)
• Attack Atlas: A Practitioner's Perspective on Challenges and Pitfalls in Red Teaming GenAI [52.138044013005]
  generative AI, particularly large language models (LLMs), become increasingly integrated into production applications. New attack surfaces and vulnerabilities emerge and put a focus on adversarial threats in natural language and multi-modal systems. Red-teaming has gained importance in proactively identifying weaknesses in these systems, while blue-teaming works to protect against such adversarial attacks. This work aims to bridge the gap between academic insights and practical security measures for the protection of generative AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T10:18:10Z)
• Richelieu: Self-Evolving LLM-Based Agents for AI Diplomacy [24.521882655442187]
  Diplomacy involves a staggering magnitude of decision spaces, especially considering the negotiation stage required. Previous AI agents have demonstrated their ability to handle multi-step games and large action spaces in multi-agent tasks. We aim to explore AI's potential to create a human-like agent capable of executing comprehensive multi-agent missions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T12:37:54Z)
• Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive Negotiation [52.930183136111864]
  We propose using scorable negotiation to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) To reach an agreement, agents must have strong arithmetic, inference, exploration, and planning capabilities. We provide procedures to create new games and increase games' difficulty to have an evolving benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T13:33:06Z)
• Learning Cyber Defence Tactics from Scratch with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [4.796742432333795]
  Team of intelligent agents in computer network defence roles may reveal promising avenues to safeguard cyber and kinetic assets. Agents are evaluated on their ability to jointly mitigate attacker activity in host-based defence scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T14:07:50Z)
• ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language Models [89.53040828210945]
  ProAgent is a novel framework that harnesses large language models to create proactive agents. ProAgent can analyze the present state, and infer the intentions of teammates from observations. ProAgent exhibits a high degree of modularity and interpretability, making it easily integrated into various coordination scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T10:36:56Z)
• AdverSAR: Adversarial Search and Rescue via Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [4.843554492319537]
  We propose an algorithm that allows robots to efficiently coordinate their strategies in the presence of adversarial inter-agent communications. It is assumed that the robots have no prior knowledge of the target locations, and they can interact with only a subset of neighboring robots at any time. The effectiveness of our approach is demonstrated on a collection of prototype grid-world environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T08:13:29Z)
• Conditional Imitation Learning for Multi-Agent Games [89.897635970366]
  We study the problem of conditional multi-agent imitation learning, where we have access to joint trajectory demonstrations at training time. We propose a novel approach to address the difficulties of scalability and data scarcity. Our model learns a low-rank subspace over ego and partner agent strategies, then infers and adapts to a new partner strategy by interpolating in the subspace.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-05T04:40:13Z)
• HAVEN: Hierarchical Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Dual Coordination Mechanism [17.993973801986677]
  Multi-agent reinforcement learning often suffers from the exponentially larger action space caused by a large number of agents. We propose a novel value decomposition framework HAVEN based on hierarchical reinforcement learning for the fully cooperative multi-agent problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-14T10:43:47Z)
• Explore and Control with Adversarial Surprise [78.41972292110967]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) provides a framework for learning goal-directed policies given user-specified rewards. We propose a new unsupervised RL technique based on an adversarial game which pits two policies against each other to compete over the amount of surprise an RL agent experiences. We show that our method leads to the emergence of complex skills by exhibiting clear phase transitions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T17:58:40Z)
• Robust Reinforcement Learning on State Observations with Learned Optimal Adversary [86.0846119254031]
  We study the robustness of reinforcement learning with adversarially perturbed state observations. With a fixed agent policy, we demonstrate that an optimal adversary to perturb state observations can be found. For DRL settings, this leads to a novel empirical adversarial attack to RL agents via a learned adversary that is much stronger than previous ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-21T05:38:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.