Richelieu: Self-Evolving LLM-Based Agents for AI Diplomacy
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.06813v4
- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 06:39:57 GMT
- Title: Richelieu: Self-Evolving LLM-Based Agents for AI Diplomacy
- Authors: Zhenyu Guan, Xiangyu Kong, Fangwei Zhong, Yizhou Wang,
- Abstract summary: Diplomacy involves a staggering magnitude of decision spaces, especially considering the negotiation stage required.
Previous AI agents have demonstrated their ability to handle multi-step games and large action spaces in multi-agent tasks.
We aim to explore AI's potential to create a human-like agent capable of executing comprehensive multi-agent missions.
- Score: 24.521882655442187
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Diplomacy is one of the most sophisticated activities in human society, involving complex interactions among multiple parties that require skills in social reasoning, negotiation, and long-term strategic planning. Previous AI agents have demonstrated their ability to handle multi-step games and large action spaces in multi-agent tasks. However, diplomacy involves a staggering magnitude of decision spaces, especially considering the negotiation stage required. While recent agents based on large language models (LLMs) have shown potential in various applications, they still struggle with extended planning periods in complex multi-agent settings. Leveraging recent technologies for LLM-based agents, we aim to explore AI's potential to create a human-like agent capable of executing comprehensive multi-agent missions by integrating three fundamental capabilities: 1) strategic planning with memory and reflection; 2) goal-oriented negotiation with social reasoning; and 3) augmenting memory through self-play games for self-evolution without human in the loop.
Related papers
- AgentSense: Benchmarking Social Intelligence of Language Agents through Interactive Scenarios [38.878966229688054]
We introduce AgentSense: Benchmarking Social Intelligence of Language Agents through Interactive Scenarios.
Drawing on Dramaturgical Theory, AgentSense employs a bottom-up approach to create 1,225 diverse social scenarios constructed from extensive scripts.
We analyze goals using ERG theory and conduct comprehensive experiments.
Our findings highlight that LLMs struggle with goals in complex social scenarios, especially high-level growth needs, and even GPT-4o requires improvement in private information reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-25T07:04:16Z) - LEGENT: Open Platform for Embodied Agents [60.71847900126832]
We introduce LEGENT, an open, scalable platform for developing embodied agents using Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Multimodal Models (LMMs)
LEGENT offers a rich, interactive 3D environment with communicable and actionable agents, paired with a user-friendly interface.
In experiments, an embryonic vision-language-action model trained on LEGENT-generated data surpasses GPT-4V in embodied tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-28T16:50:12Z) - Position Paper: Agent AI Towards a Holistic Intelligence [53.35971598180146]
We emphasize developing Agent AI -- an embodied system that integrates large foundation models into agent actions.
In this paper, we propose a novel large action model to achieve embodied intelligent behavior, the Agent Foundation Model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T16:09:56Z) - Agent-Pro: Learning to Evolve via Policy-Level Reflection and Optimization [53.510942601223626]
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit robust problem-solving capabilities for diverse tasks.
These task solvers necessitate manually crafted prompts to inform task rules and regulate behaviors.
We propose Agent-Pro: an LLM-based Agent with Policy-level Reflection and Optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-27T15:09:20Z) - LLM-Powered Hierarchical Language Agent for Real-time Human-AI
Coordination [28.22553394518179]
We propose a Hierarchical Language Agent (HLA) for human-AI coordination.
HLA provides both strong reasoning abilities while keeping real-time execution.
Human studies show that HLA outperforms other baseline agents, including slow-mind-only agents and fast-mind-only agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-23T11:09:48Z) - Multi-Agent Consensus Seeking via Large Language Models [6.922356864800498]
Multi-agent systems driven by large language models (LLMs) have shown promising abilities for solving complex tasks in a collaborative manner.
This work considers a fundamental problem in multi-agent collaboration: consensus seeking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-31T03:37:11Z) - Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive Negotiation [52.930183136111864]
We propose using scorable negotiation to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs)
To reach an agreement, agents must have strong arithmetic, inference, exploration, and planning capabilities.
We provide procedures to create new games and increase games' difficulty to have an evolving benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-29T13:33:06Z) - The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey [91.71061158000953]
Large language models (LLMs) are regarded as potential sparks for Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)
We start by tracing the concept of agents from its philosophical origins to its development in AI, and explain why LLMs are suitable foundations for agents.
We explore the extensive applications of LLM-based agents in three aspects: single-agent scenarios, multi-agent scenarios, and human-agent cooperation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-14T17:12:03Z) - ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language
Models [89.53040828210945]
ProAgent is a novel framework that harnesses large language models to create proactive agents.
ProAgent can analyze the present state, and infer the intentions of teammates from observations.
ProAgent exhibits a high degree of modularity and interpretability, making it easily integrated into various coordination scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-22T10:36:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.