Reinforcement Learning for Decision-Level Interception Prioritization in Drone Swarm Defense
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.00641v1
- Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2025 13:55:39 GMT
- Title: Reinforcement Learning for Decision-Level Interception Prioritization in Drone Swarm Defense
- Authors: Alessandro Palmas,
- Abstract summary: We present a case study demonstrating the practical advantages of reinforcement learning in addressing this challenge.<n>We introduce a high-fidelity simulation environment that captures realistic operational constraints.<n>Agent learns to coordinate multiple effectors for optimal interception prioritization.<n>We evaluate the learned policy against a handcrafted rule-based baseline across hundreds of simulated attack scenarios.
- Score: 56.47577824219207
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The growing threat of low-cost kamikaze drone swarms poses a critical challenge to modern defense systems demanding rapid and strategic decision-making to prioritize interceptions across multiple effectors and high-value target zones. In this work, we present a case study demonstrating the practical advantages of reinforcement learning in addressing this challenge. We introduce a high-fidelity simulation environment that captures realistic operational constraints, within which a decision-level reinforcement learning agent learns to coordinate multiple effectors for optimal interception prioritization. Operating in a discrete action space, the agent selects which drone to engage per effector based on observed state features such as positions, classes, and effector status. We evaluate the learned policy against a handcrafted rule-based baseline across hundreds of simulated attack scenarios. The reinforcement learning based policy consistently achieves lower average damage and higher defensive efficiency in protecting critical zones. This case study highlights the potential of reinforcement learning as a strategic layer within defense architectures, enhancing resilience without displacing existing control systems. All code and simulation assets are publicly released for full reproducibility, and a video demonstration illustrates the policy's qualitative behavior.
Related papers
- Learned Controllers for Agile Quadrotors in Pursuit-Evasion Games [46.53041975119627]
We present a reinforcement learning framework for agile 1v1 quadrotor pursuit-evasion.<n>We train neural network policies to command body rates and collective thrust, enabling high-speed pursuit and evasive maneuvers.<n>Our results show that rate-based policies achieve significantly higher capture rates and peak speeds than velocity-level baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-03T13:19:23Z) - Enhancing Aerial Combat Tactics through Hierarchical Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [38.15185397658309]
This work presents a Hierarchical Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning framework for analyzing simulated air combat scenarios.<n>The objective is to identify effective Courses of Action that lead to mission success within preset simulations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-13T22:13:48Z) - ARBoids: Adaptive Residual Reinforcement Learning With Boids Model for Cooperative Multi-USV Target Defense [0.918715978278858]
This letter introduces ARBoids, a novel adaptive residual reinforcement learning framework.<n>It integrates deep reinforcement learning with the biologically inspired, force-based Boids model.<n>The proposed approach is validated in a high-fidelity Gazebo simulation environment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-25T16:05:33Z) - A Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning Framework for Multi-UAV Combat Using Leader-Follower Strategy [3.095786524987445]
Multi-UAV air combat is a complex task involving multiple autonomous UAVs.<n>Previous approaches predominantly discretize the action space into predefined actions.<n>We propose a hierarchical framework utilizing the Leader-Follower Multi-Agent Proximal Policy Optimization strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-22T02:41:36Z) - Mutual-modality Adversarial Attack with Semantic Perturbation [81.66172089175346]
We propose a novel approach that generates adversarial attacks in a mutual-modality optimization scheme.
Our approach outperforms state-of-the-art attack methods and can be readily deployed as a plug-and-play solution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-20T05:06:01Z) - Hierarchical Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Air Combat
Maneuvering [40.06500618820166]
We propose a hierarchical multi-agent reinforcement learning framework for air-to-air combat with multiple heterogeneous agents.
Low-level policies are trained for accurate unit combat control. The commander policy is trained on mission targets given pre-trained low-level policies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-20T12:16:00Z) - Approximate Shielding of Atari Agents for Safe Exploration [83.55437924143615]
We propose a principled algorithm for safe exploration based on the concept of shielding.
We present preliminary results that show our approximate shielding algorithm effectively reduces the rate of safety violations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-21T16:19:54Z) - Fixed Points in Cyber Space: Rethinking Optimal Evasion Attacks in the
Age of AI-NIDS [70.60975663021952]
We study blackbox adversarial attacks on network classifiers.
We argue that attacker-defender fixed points are themselves general-sum games with complex phase transitions.
We show that a continual learning approach is required to study attacker-defender dynamics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-23T23:42:16Z) - Disturbing Reinforcement Learning Agents with Corrupted Rewards [62.997667081978825]
We analyze the effects of different attack strategies based on reward perturbations on reinforcement learning algorithms.
We show that smoothly crafting adversarial rewards are able to mislead the learner, and that using low exploration probability values, the policy learned is more robust to corrupt rewards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-12T15:53:48Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.