Remember to correct the bias when using deep learning for regression!

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.16470v1
• Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 17:09:03 GMT
• Title: Remember to correct the bias when using deep learning for regression!
• Authors: Christian Igel and Stefan Oehmcke
• Abstract summary: When training deep learning models for least-squares regression, we cannot expect that the training error residuals of the final model, selected after a fixed training time, sum to zero. We suggest to adjust the bias of the machine learning model after training as a default postprocessing step, which efficiently solves the problem.
• Score: 13.452510519858992
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: When training deep learning models for least-squares regression, we cannot expect that the training error residuals of the final model, selected after a fixed training time or based on performance on a hold-out data set, sum to zero. This can introduce a systematic error that accumulates if we are interested in the total aggregated performance over many data points. We suggest to adjust the bias of the machine learning model after training as a default postprocessing step, which efficiently solves the problem. The severeness of the error accumulation and the effectiveness of the bias correction is demonstrated in exemplary experiments.

Related papers

• Machine Unlearning on Pre-trained Models by Residual Feature Alignment Using LoRA [15.542668474378633]
  We propose a novel and efficient machine unlearning method on pre-trained models. We leverage LoRA to decompose the model's intermediate features into pre-trained features and residual features. The method aims to learn the zero residuals on the retained set and shifted residuals on the unlearning set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-13T08:56:35Z)
• Attribute-to-Delete: Machine Unlearning via Datamodel Matching [65.13151619119782]
  Machine unlearning -- efficiently removing a small "forget set" training data on a pre-divertrained machine learning model -- has recently attracted interest. Recent research shows that machine unlearning techniques do not hold up in such a challenging setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T17:20:10Z)
• Distilled Datamodel with Reverse Gradient Matching [74.75248610868685]
  We introduce an efficient framework for assessing data impact, comprising offline training and online evaluation stages. Our proposed method achieves comparable model behavior evaluation while significantly speeding up the process compared to the direct retraining method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T09:16:14Z)
• Efficient Grammatical Error Correction Via Multi-Task Training and Optimized Training Schedule [55.08778142798106]
  We propose auxiliary tasks that exploit the alignment between the original and corrected sentences. We formulate each task as a sequence-to-sequence problem and perform multi-task training. We find that the order of datasets used for training and even individual instances within a dataset may have important effects on the final performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T14:50:12Z)
• On minimizing the training set fill distance in machine learning regression [0.552480439325792]
  We study a data selection approach that aims to minimize the fill distance of the selected set. We show that selecting training sets with the FPS can also increase model stability for the specific case of Gaussian kernel regression approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T16:18:33Z)
• Deep Regression Unlearning [6.884272840652062]
  We introduce deep regression unlearning methods that generalize well and are robust to privacy attacks. We conduct regression unlearning experiments for computer vision, natural language processing and forecasting applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-15T05:00:20Z)
• Challenges and Pitfalls of Bayesian Unlearning [6.931200003384123]
  Machine unlearning refers to the task of removing a subset of training data, thereby removing its contributions to a trained model. Approximate unlearning are one class of methods for this task which avoid the need to retrain the model from scratch on the retained data. Bayes' rule can be used to cast approximate unlearning as an inference problem where the objective is to obtain the updated posterior by dividing out the likelihood of deleted data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-07T11:24:50Z)
• Variation-Incentive Loss Re-weighting for Regression Analysis on Biased Data [8.115323786541078]
  We aim to improve the accuracy of the regression analysis by addressing the data skewness/bias during model training. We propose a Variation-Incentive Loss re-weighting method (VILoss) to optimize the gradient descent-based model training for regression analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-14T10:22:21Z)
• Time-Series Imputation with Wasserstein Interpolation for Optimal Look-Ahead-Bias and Variance Tradeoff [66.59869239999459]
  In finance, imputation of missing returns may be applied prior to training a portfolio optimization model. There is an inherent trade-off between the look-ahead-bias of using the full data set for imputation and the larger variance in the imputation from using only the training data. We propose a Bayesian posterior consensus distribution which optimally controls the variance and look-ahead-bias trade-off in the imputation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-25T09:05:35Z)
• Variational Bayesian Unlearning [54.26984662139516]
  We study the problem of approximately unlearning a Bayesian model from a small subset of the training data to be erased. We show that it is equivalent to minimizing an evidence upper bound which trades off between fully unlearning from erased data vs. not entirely forgetting the posterior belief. In model training with VI, only an approximate (instead of exact) posterior belief given the full data can be obtained, which makes unlearning even more challenging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-24T11:53:00Z)
• Predicting Training Time Without Training [120.92623395389255]
  We tackle the problem of predicting the number of optimization steps that a pre-trained deep network needs to converge to a given value of the loss function. We leverage the fact that the training dynamics of a deep network during fine-tuning are well approximated by those of a linearized model. We are able to predict the time it takes to fine-tune a model to a given loss without having to perform any training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-28T04:29:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.