Leveraging Privacy Profiles to Empower Users in the Digital Society

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.00011v1
• Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 15:31:50 GMT
• Title: Leveraging Privacy Profiles to Empower Users in the Digital Society
• Authors: Davide Di Ruscio, Paola Inverardi, Patrizio Migliarini, Phuong T. Nguyen
• Abstract summary: Privacy and ethics of citizens are at the core of the concerns raised by our increasingly digital society. We focus on the privacy dimension and contribute a step in the above direction through an empirical study on an existing dataset collected from the fitness domain. The results reveal that a compact set of semantic-driven questions helps distinguish users better than a complex domain-dependent one.
• Score: 7.350403786094707
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Privacy and ethics of citizens are at the core of the concerns raised by our increasingly digital society. Profiling users is standard practice for software applications triggering the need for users, also enforced by laws, to properly manage privacy settings. Users need to manage software privacy settings properly to protect personally identifiable information and express personal ethical preferences. AI technologies that empower users to interact with the digital world by reflecting their personal ethical preferences can be key enablers of a trustworthy digital society. We focus on the privacy dimension and contribute a step in the above direction through an empirical study on an existing dataset collected from the fitness domain. We find out which set of questions is appropriate to differentiate users according to their preferences. The results reveal that a compact set of semantic-driven questions (about domain-independent privacy preferences) helps distinguish users better than a complex domain-dependent one. This confirms the study's hypothesis that moral attitudes are the relevant piece of information to collect. Based on the outcome, we implement a recommender system to provide users with suitable recommendations related to privacy choices. We then show that the proposed recommender system provides relevant settings to users, obtaining high accuracy.

Related papers

• Collection, usage and privacy of mobility data in the enterprise and public administrations [55.2480439325792]
  Security measures such as anonymization are needed to protect individuals' privacy. Within our study, we conducted expert interviews to gain insights into practices in the field. We survey privacy-enhancing methods in use, which generally do not comply with state-of-the-art standards of differential privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T08:29:27Z)
• Mind the Privacy Unit! User-Level Differential Privacy for Language Model Fine-Tuning [62.224804688233]
  differential privacy (DP) offers a promising solution by ensuring models are 'almost indistinguishable' with or without any particular privacy unit. We study user-level DP motivated by applications where it necessary to ensure uniform privacy protection across users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T13:54:32Z)
• User Consented Federated Recommender System Against Personalized Attribute Inference Attack [55.24441467292359]
  We propose a user-consented federated recommendation system (UC-FedRec) to flexibly satisfy the different privacy needs of users. UC-FedRec allows users to self-define their privacy preferences to meet various demands and makes recommendations with user consent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-23T09:44:57Z)
• Tapping into Privacy: A Study of User Preferences and Concerns on Trigger-Action Platforms [0.0]
  The Internet of Things (IoT) devices are rapidly increasing in popularity, with more individuals using Internet-connected devices that continuously monitor their activities. This work explores privacy concerns and expectations of end-users related to Trigger-Action platforms (TAPs) in the context of the Internet of Things (IoT) TAPs allow users to customize their smart environments by creating rules that trigger actions based on specific events or conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-11T14:25:01Z)
• Randomized algorithms for precise measurement of differentially-private, personalized recommendations [6.793345945003182]
  We propose an algorithm for personalized recommendations that facilitates both precise and differentially-private measurement. We conduct offline experiments to quantify how the proposed privacy-preserving algorithm affects key metrics related to user experience, advertiser value, and platform revenue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T17:34:58Z)
• Systematic Review on Privacy Categorization [1.5377372227901214]
  This work aims to present a systematic review of the literature on privacy categorization. Privacy categorization involves the possibility to classify users according to specific prerequisites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-07T15:18:26Z)
• Protecting User Privacy in Online Settings via Supervised Learning [69.38374877559423]
  We design an intelligent approach to online privacy protection that leverages supervised learning. By detecting and blocking data collection that might infringe on a user's privacy, we can restore a degree of digital privacy to the user.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T05:20:16Z)
• How Do Input Attributes Impact the Privacy Loss in Differential Privacy? [55.492422758737575]
  We study the connection between the per-subject norm in DP neural networks and individual privacy loss. We introduce a novel metric termed the Privacy Loss-Input Susceptibility (PLIS) which allows one to apportion the subject's privacy loss to their input attributes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T11:39:03Z)
• Privacy Explanations - A Means to End-User Trust [64.7066037969487]
  We looked into how explainability might help to tackle this problem. We created privacy explanations that aim to help to clarify to end users why and for what purposes specific data is required. Our findings reveal that privacy explanations can be an important step towards increasing trust in software systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T09:30:37Z)
• How Much User Context Do We Need? Privacy by Design in Mental Health NLP Application [33.3172788815152]
  Clinical tasks such as mental health assessment from text must take social constraints into account. We present first analysis juxtaposing user history length and differential privacy budgets and elaborate how modeling additional user context enables utility preservation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-05T15:41:45Z)
• A Self-aware Personal Assistant for Making Personalized Privacy Decisions [3.988307519677766]
  This paper proposes a personal assistant that uses deep learning to classify content based on its privacy label. By factoring in the user's own understanding of privacy, such as risk factors or own labels, the personal assistant can personalize its recommendations per user.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-13T10:15:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.