Volumetric Benchmarking of Error Mitigation with Qermit

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.09725v3
• Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 11:19:37 GMT
• Title: Volumetric Benchmarking of Error Mitigation with Qermit
• Authors: Cristina Cirstoiu, Silas Dilkes, Daniel Mills, Seyon Sivarajah, Ross Duncan
• Abstract summary: We develop a methodology to assess the performance of quantum error mitigation techniques. Our benchmarks are volumetric in design, and are performed on different superconducting hardware devices. Qermit is an open source python package for quantum error mitigation.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The detrimental effect of noise accumulates as quantum computers grow in size. In the case where devices are too small or noisy to perform error correction, error mitigation may be used. Error mitigation does not increase the fidelity of quantum states, but instead aims to reduce the approximation error in quantities of concern, such as expectation values of observables. However, it is as yet unclear which circuit types, and devices of which characteristics, benefit most from the use of error mitigation. Here we develop a methodology to assess the performance of quantum error mitigation techniques. Our benchmarks are volumetric in design, and are performed on different superconducting hardware devices. Extensive classical simulations are also used for comparison. We use these benchmarks to identify disconnects between the predicted and practical performance of error mitigation protocols, and to identify the situations in which their use is beneficial. To perform these experiments, and for the benefit of the wider community, we introduce Qermit - an open source python package for quantum error mitigation. Qermit supports a wide range of error mitigation methods, is easily extensible and has a modular graph-based software design that facilitates composition of error mitigation protocols and subroutines.

Related papers

• Bounding the systematic error in quantum error mitigation due to model violation [0.0]
  We develop a methodology to efficiently compute upper bounds on the impact of error-model inaccuracy in error mitigation. Our protocols require no additional experiments, and instead rely on comparisons between the error model and the error-learning data. We show that our estimated upper bounds are typically close to the worst observed performance of error mitigation on random circuits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T16:27:00Z)
• Suppressing Correlated Noise in Quantum Computers via Context-Aware Compiling [0.9623525909952625]
  Correlations in noise can occur as a result of spatial and temporal configurations of instructions executing on the quantum processor. We devise compiler strategies to suppress these errors using dynamical decoupling or error compensation into the rest of the circuit. Our experiments show an increase of 18.5% in layer fidelity for a candidate 10-qubit circuit layer compared to context-unaware suppression.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T16:08:52Z)
• Fast Flux-Activated Leakage Reduction for Superconducting Quantum Circuits [84.60542868688235]
  leakage out of the computational subspace arising from the multi-level structure of qubit implementations. We present a resource-efficient universal leakage reduction unit for superconducting qubits using parametric flux modulation. We demonstrate that using the leakage reduction unit in repeated weight-two stabilizer measurements reduces the total number of detected errors in a scalable fashion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T16:21:32Z)
• Hypothesis Testing for Error Mitigation: How to Evaluate Error Mitigation [0.9405458160620533]
  We introduce hypothesis testing within the framework of quantum error mitigation. We propose an inclusive figure of merit that accounts for both resource requirement and mitigation efficiency. We experimentally evaluate $16$ error mitigation pipelines composed of singular methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-06T19:16:08Z)
• The Accuracy vs. Sampling Overhead Trade-off in Quantum Error Mitigation Using Monte Carlo-Based Channel Inversion [84.66087478797475]
  Quantum error mitigation (QEM) is a class of promising techniques for reducing the computational error of variational quantum algorithms. We consider a practical channel inversion strategy based on Monte Carlo sampling, which introduces additional computational error. We show that when the computational error is small compared to the dynamic range of the error-free results, it scales with the square root of the number of gates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-20T00:05:01Z)
• Measuring NISQ Gate-Based Qubit Stability Using a 1+1 Field Theory and Cycle Benchmarking [50.8020641352841]
  We study coherent errors on a quantum hardware platform using a transverse field Ising model Hamiltonian as a sample user application. We identify inter-day and intra-day qubit calibration drift and the impacts of quantum circuit placement on groups of qubits in different physical locations on the processor. This paper also discusses how these measurements can provide a better understanding of these types of errors and how they may improve efforts to validate the accuracy of quantum computations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-08T23:12:55Z)
• Performance of teleportation-based error correction circuits for bosonic codes with noisy measurements [58.720142291102135]
  We analyze the error-correction capabilities of rotation-symmetric codes using a teleportation-based error-correction circuit. We find that with the currently achievable measurement efficiencies in microwave optics, bosonic rotation codes undergo a substantial decrease in their break-even potential.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-02T16:12:13Z)
• Fault-tolerant parity readout on a shuttling-based trapped-ion quantum computer [64.47265213752996]
  We experimentally demonstrate a fault-tolerant weight-4 parity check measurement scheme. We achieve a flag-conditioned parity measurement single-shot fidelity of 93.2(2)%. The scheme is an essential building block in a broad class of stabilizer quantum error correction protocols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-13T20:08:04Z)
• Qubit Readout Error Mitigation with Bit-flip Averaging [0.0]
  We present a scheme to more efficiently mitigate qubit readout errors on quantum hardware. Our scheme removes biases in the readout errors allowing a general error model to be built with far fewer calibration measurements. Our approach can be combined with, and simplify, other mitigation methods allowing tractable mitigation even for large numbers of qubits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-10T15:08:06Z)
• Simple Mitigation of Global Depolarizing Errors in Quantum Simulations [0.0]
  We present a simple but effective error mitigation technique based on the assumption that noise in a deep quantum circuit is well described by global depolarizing error channels. By measuring the errors directly on the device, we use an error model ansatz to infer error-free results from noisy data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-05T18:31:28Z)
• Scalable quantum processor noise characterization [57.57666052437813]
  We present a scalable way to construct approximate MFMs for many-qubit devices based on cumulant expansion. Our method can also be used to characterize various types of correlation error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-02T17:39:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.