An Efficient Approach for Optimizing the Cost-effective Individualized
Treatment Rule Using Conditional Random Forest
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.10971v1
- Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2022 01:36:24 GMT
- Title: An Efficient Approach for Optimizing the Cost-effective Individualized
Treatment Rule Using Conditional Random Forest
- Authors: Yizhe Xu, Tom H. Greene, Adam P. Bress, Brandon K. Bellows, Yue Zhang,
Zugui Zhang, Paul Kolm, William S.Weintraub, Andrew S. Moran, Jincheng Shen
- Abstract summary: We use the concept of net-monetary-benefit (NMB) to assess the trade-off between health benefits and related costs.
We identify the optimal CE-ITR using NMB-based classification algorithms.
We apply our top-performing algorithm to the NIH-funded Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.
- Score: 5.406112598028401
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Evidence from observational studies has become increasingly important for
supporting healthcare policy making via cost-effectiveness (CE) analyses.
Similar as in comparative effectiveness studies, health economic evaluations
that consider subject-level heterogeneity produce individualized treatment
rules (ITRs) that are often more cost-effective than one-size-fits-all
treatment. Thus, it is of great interest to develop statistical tools for
learning such a cost-effective ITR (CE-ITR) under the causal inference
framework that allows proper handling of potential confounding and can be
applied to both trials and observational studies. In this paper, we use the
concept of net-monetary-benefit (NMB) to assess the trade-off between health
benefits and related costs. We estimate CE-ITR as a function of patients'
characteristics that, when implemented, optimizes the allocation of limited
healthcare resources by maximizing health gains while minimizing
treatment-related costs. We employ the conditional random forest approach and
identify the optimal CE-ITR using NMB-based classification algorithms, where
two partitioned estimators are proposed for the subject-specific weights to
effectively incorporate information from censored individuals. We conduct
simulation studies to evaluate the performance of our proposals. We apply our
top-performing algorithm to the NIH-funded Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention
Trial (SPRINT) to illustrate the CE gains of assigning customized intensive
blood pressure therapy.
Related papers
- Privacy Preserving Adaptive Experiment Design [13.839525385976303]
We investigate the tradeoff between loss of social welfare and statistical power in contextual bandit experiment.
We propose differentially private algorithms which still matches the lower bound, showing that privacy is "almost free"
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-16T09:22:12Z) - Policy Optimization for Personalized Interventions in Behavioral Health [8.10897203067601]
Behavioral health interventions, delivered through digital platforms, have the potential to significantly improve health outcomes.
We study the problem of optimizing personalized interventions for patients to maximize a long-term outcome.
We present a new approach for this problem that we dub DecompPI, which decomposes the state space for a system of patients to the individual level.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-21T21:42:03Z) - Improved Policy Evaluation for Randomized Trials of Algorithmic Resource
Allocation [54.72195809248172]
We present a new estimator leveraging our proposed novel concept, that involves retrospective reshuffling of participants across experimental arms at the end of an RCT.
We prove theoretically that such an estimator is more accurate than common estimators based on sample means.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-06T05:17:22Z) - Assessment of Treatment Effect Estimators for Heavy-Tailed Data [70.72363097550483]
A central obstacle in the objective assessment of treatment effect (TE) estimators in randomized control trials (RCTs) is the lack of ground truth (or validation set) to test their performance.
We provide a novel cross-validation-like methodology to address this challenge.
We evaluate our methodology across 709 RCTs implemented in the Amazon supply chain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-14T17:53:01Z) - CAPITAL: Optimal Subgroup Identification via Constrained Policy Tree
Search [10.961093227672398]
A clinically meaningful subgroup learning approach should identify the maximum number of patients who can benefit from the better treatment.
We present an optimal subgroup selection rule (SSR) that maximizes the number of selected patients.
We propose a ConstrAined PolIcy Tree seArch aLgorithm to find the optimal SSR within the interpretable decision tree class.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-11T22:41:07Z) - Stochastic Intervention for Causal Inference via Reinforcement Learning [7.015556609676951]
Central to causal inference is the treatment effect estimation of intervention strategies.
Existing methods are mostly restricted to the deterministic treatment and compare outcomes under different treatments.
We propose a new effective framework to estimate the treatment effect on intervention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-28T00:11:22Z) - Reinforcement Learning with Efficient Active Feature Acquisition [59.91808801541007]
In real-life, information acquisition might correspond to performing a medical test on a patient.
We propose a model-based reinforcement learning framework that learns an active feature acquisition policy.
Key to the success is a novel sequential variational auto-encoder that learns high-quality representations from partially observed states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-02T08:46:27Z) - A standardized framework for risk-based assessment of treatment effect
heterogeneity in observational healthcare databases [60.07352590494571]
The aim of this study was to extend this approach to the observational setting using a standardized scalable framework.
We demonstrate our framework by evaluating the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors versus beta blockers on three efficacy and six safety outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-13T14:48:31Z) - Predictive Modeling of ICU Healthcare-Associated Infections from
Imbalanced Data. Using Ensembles and a Clustering-Based Undersampling
Approach [55.41644538483948]
This work is focused on both the identification of risk factors and the prediction of healthcare-associated infections in intensive-care units.
The aim is to support decision making addressed at reducing the incidence rate of infections.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-07T16:13:12Z) - Bayesian Nonparametric Cost-Effectiveness Analyses: Causal Estimation
and Adaptive Subgroup Discovery [0.0]
We develop a nonparametric Bayesian model for joint cost-survival distributions in the presence of censoring.
We use our model to assess the cost-efficacy of endometrial chemotherapy versus radiation adjuvant therapy for treating cancer in the SEER-Medicare database.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-11T21:51:58Z) - Contextual Constrained Learning for Dose-Finding Clinical Trials [102.8283665750281]
C3T-Budget is a contextual constrained clinical trial algorithm for dose-finding under both budget and safety constraints.
It recruits patients with consideration of the remaining budget, the remaining time, and the characteristics of each group.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-08T11:46:48Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.