Standardized Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods for Evolving Data Streams

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.13625v1
• Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 16:40:33 GMT
• Title: Standardized Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods for Evolving Data Streams
• Authors: Johannes Haug, Effi Tramountani, Gjergji Kasneci
• Abstract summary: We propose a comprehensive set of properties for high-quality machine learning in evolving data streams. We discuss sensible performance measures and evaluation strategies for online predictive modelling, online feature selection and concept drift detection. The proposed evaluation standards are provided in a new Python framework called float.
• Score: 11.17545155325116
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Due to the unspecified and dynamic nature of data streams, online machine learning requires powerful and flexible solutions. However, evaluating online machine learning methods under realistic conditions is difficult. Existing work therefore often draws on different heuristics and simulations that do not necessarily produce meaningful and reliable results. Indeed, in the absence of common evaluation standards, it often remains unclear how online learning methods will perform in practice or in comparison to similar work. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive set of properties for high-quality machine learning in evolving data streams. In particular, we discuss sensible performance measures and evaluation strategies for online predictive modelling, online feature selection and concept drift detection. As one of the first works, we also look at the interpretability of online learning methods. The proposed evaluation standards are provided in a new Python framework called float. Float is completely modular and allows the simultaneous integration of common libraries, such as scikit-multiflow or river, with custom code. Float is open-sourced and can be accessed at https://github.com/haugjo/float. In this sense, we hope that our work will contribute to more standardized, reliable and realistic testing and comparison of online machine learning methods.

Related papers

• RanDumb: A Simple Approach that Questions the Efficacy of Continual Representation Learning [68.42776779425978]
  We show that existing online continually trained deep networks produce inferior representations compared to a simple pre-defined random transforms. We then train a simple linear classifier on top without storing any exemplars, processing one sample at a time in an online continual learning setting. Our study reveals the significant limitations of representation learning, particularly in low-exemplar and online continual learning scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T22:07:29Z)
• A Comprehensive Empirical Evaluation on Online Continual Learning [20.39495058720296]
  We evaluate methods from the literature that tackle online continual learning. We focus on the class-incremental setting in the context of image classification. We compare these methods on the Split-CIFAR100 and Split-TinyImagenet benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-20T17:52:02Z)
• Real-Time Evaluation in Online Continual Learning: A New Hope [104.53052316526546]
  We evaluate current Continual Learning (CL) methods with respect to their computational costs. A simple baseline outperforms state-of-the-art CL methods under this evaluation. This surprisingly suggests that the majority of existing CL literature is tailored to a specific class of streams that is not practical.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-02T12:21:10Z)
• Improving Behavioural Cloning with Positive Unlabeled Learning [15.484227081812852]
  We propose a novel iterative learning algorithm for identifying expert trajectories in mixed-quality robotics datasets. Applying behavioral cloning to the resulting filtered dataset outperforms several competitive offline reinforcement learning and imitation learning baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-27T14:17:45Z)
• Towards Data-Driven Offline Simulations for Online Reinforcement Learning [30.654163861164864]
  We formalize offline learner simulation (OLS) for reinforcement learning (RL) We propose a novel evaluation protocol that measures both fidelity and efficiency of the simulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-14T18:36:13Z)
• Online vs. Offline Adaptive Domain Randomization Benchmark [20.69035879843824]
  We present an open benchmark for both offline and online methods (SimOpt, BayRn, DROID, DROPO) to shed light on which are most suitable for each setting and task at hand. We found that online methods are limited by the quality of the currently learned policy for the next iteration, while offline methods may sometimes fail when replaying trajectories in simulation with open-loop commands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-29T14:03:53Z)
• Passive learning to address nonstationarity in virtual flow metering applications [0.0]
  This paper explores how learning methods can be applied to sustain the prediction accuracy of steady-state virtual flow meters. Two passive learning methods, periodic batch learning and online learning, are applied with varying calibration frequency to train virtual flow meters. The results are two-fold: first, in the presence of frequently arriving measurements, frequent model updating sustains an excellent prediction performance over time; second, in the presence of intermittent and infrequently arriving measurements, frequent updating is essential to increase the performance accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T14:42:00Z)
• RvS: What is Essential for Offline RL via Supervised Learning? [77.91045677562802]
  Recent work has shown that supervised learning alone, without temporal difference (TD) learning, can be remarkably effective for offline RL. In every environment suite we consider simply maximizing likelihood with two-layer feedforward is competitive. They also probe the limits of existing RvS methods, which are comparatively weak on random data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T18:55:16Z)
• A Workflow for Offline Model-Free Robotic Reinforcement Learning [117.07743713715291]
  offline reinforcement learning (RL) enables learning control policies by utilizing only prior experience, without any online interaction. We develop a practical workflow for using offline RL analogous to the relatively well-understood for supervised learning problems. We demonstrate the efficacy of this workflow in producing effective policies without any online tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-22T16:03:29Z)
• Online Continual Learning with Natural Distribution Shifts: An Empirical Study with Visual Data [101.6195176510611]
  "Online" continual learning enables evaluating both information retention and online learning efficacy. In online continual learning, each incoming small batch of data is first used for testing and then added to the training set, making the problem truly online. We introduce a new benchmark for online continual visual learning that exhibits large scale and natural distribution shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-20T06:17:20Z)
• Task-agnostic Continual Learning with Hybrid Probabilistic Models [75.01205414507243]
  We propose HCL, a Hybrid generative-discriminative approach to Continual Learning for classification. The flow is used to learn the data distribution, perform classification, identify task changes, and avoid forgetting. We demonstrate the strong performance of HCL on a range of continual learning benchmarks such as split-MNIST, split-CIFAR, and SVHN-MNIST.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-24T05:19:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.