SHAPE: An Unified Approach to Evaluate the Contribution and Cooperation of Individual Modalities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.00302v1
• Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2022 16:35:40 GMT
• Title: SHAPE: An Unified Approach to Evaluate the Contribution and Cooperation of Individual Modalities
• Authors: Pengbo Hu, Xingyu Li, Yi Zhou
• Abstract summary: We use bf SHapley vbf Alue-based bf PErceptual (SHAPE) scores to measure the marginal contribution of individual modalities and the degree of cooperation across modalities. Our experiments suggest that for some tasks where different modalities are complementary, the multi-modal models still tend to use the dominant modality alone. We hope our scores can help improve the understanding of how the present multi-modal models operate on different modalities and encourage more sophisticated methods of integrating multiple modalities.
• Score: 7.9602600629569285
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As deep learning advances, there is an ever-growing demand for models capable of synthesizing information from multi-modal resources to address the complex tasks raised from real-life applications. Recently, many large multi-modal datasets have been collected, on which researchers actively explore different methods of fusing multi-modal information. However, little attention has been paid to quantifying the contribution of different modalities within the proposed models. In this paper, we propose the {\bf SH}apley v{\bf A}lue-based {\bf PE}rceptual (SHAPE) scores that measure the marginal contribution of individual modalities and the degree of cooperation across modalities. Using these scores, we systematically evaluate different fusion methods on different multi-modal datasets for different tasks. Our experiments suggest that for some tasks where different modalities are complementary, the multi-modal models still tend to use the dominant modality alone and ignore the cooperation across modalities. On the other hand, models learn to exploit cross-modal cooperation when different modalities are indispensable for the task. In this case, the scores indicate it is better to fuse different modalities at relatively early stages. We hope our scores can help improve the understanding of how the present multi-modal models operate on different modalities and encourage more sophisticated methods of integrating multiple modalities.

Related papers

• What to align in multimodal contrastive learning? [7.7439394183358745]
  We introduce Contrastive MultiModal learning strategy that enables the communication between modalities in a single multimodal space. Our theoretical analysis shows that shared, synergistic and unique terms of information naturally emerge from this formulation, allowing us to estimate multimodal interactions beyond redundancy. In the latter, CoMM learns complex multimodal interactions and achieves state-of-the-art results on the six multimodal benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-11T16:42:22Z)
• HEMM: Holistic Evaluation of Multimodal Foundation Models [91.60364024897653]
  Multimodal foundation models can holistically process text alongside images, video, audio, and other sensory modalities. It is challenging to characterize and study progress in multimodal foundation models, given the range of possible modeling decisions, tasks, and domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T18:00:48Z)
• Beyond Unimodal Learning: The Importance of Integrating Multiple Modalities for Lifelong Learning [23.035725779568587]
  We study the role and interactions of multiple modalities in mitigating forgetting in deep neural networks (DNNs) Our findings demonstrate that leveraging multiple views and complementary information from multiple modalities enables the model to learn more accurate and robust representations. We propose a method for integrating and aligning the information from different modalities by utilizing the relational structural similarities between the data points in each modality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-04T22:02:58Z)
• Unified Multi-modal Unsupervised Representation Learning for Skeleton-based Action Understanding [62.70450216120704]
  Unsupervised pre-training has shown great success in skeleton-based action understanding. We propose a Unified Multimodal Unsupervised Representation Learning framework, called UmURL. UmURL exploits an efficient early-fusion strategy to jointly encode the multi-modal features in a single-stream manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T13:56:57Z)
• Enhancing multimodal cooperation via sample-level modality valuation [10.677997431505815]
  We introduce a sample-level modality valuation metric to evaluate the contribution of each modality for each sample. Via modality valuation we observe that modality discrepancy indeed could be different at sample-level beyond the global contribution discrepancy at dataset-level. Our methods reasonably observe the fine-grained uni-modal contribution and achieve considerable improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-12T14:16:34Z)
• Learning Unseen Modality Interaction [54.23533023883659]
  Multimodal learning assumes all modality combinations of interest are available during training to learn cross-modal correspondences. We pose the problem of unseen modality interaction and introduce a first solution. It exploits a module that projects the multidimensional features of different modalities into a common space with rich information preserved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-22T10:53:10Z)
• Multimodal Learning Without Labeled Multimodal Data: Guarantees and Applications [90.6849884683226]
  We study the challenge of interaction quantification in a semi-supervised setting with only labeled unimodal data. Using a precise information-theoretic definition of interactions, our key contribution is the derivation of lower and upper bounds. We show how these theoretical results can be used to estimate multimodal model performance, guide data collection, and select appropriate multimodal models for various tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T15:44:53Z)
• IMF: Interactive Multimodal Fusion Model for Link Prediction [13.766345726697404]
  We introduce a novel Interactive Multimodal Fusion (IMF) model to integrate knowledge from different modalities. Our approach has been demonstrated to be effective through empirical evaluations on several real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-20T01:20:02Z)
• Quantifying & Modeling Multimodal Interactions: An Information Decomposition Framework [89.8609061423685]
  We propose an information-theoretic approach to quantify the degree of redundancy, uniqueness, and synergy relating input modalities with an output task. To validate PID estimation, we conduct extensive experiments on both synthetic datasets where the PID is known and on large-scale multimodal benchmarks. We demonstrate their usefulness in (1) quantifying interactions within multimodal datasets, (2) quantifying interactions captured by multimodal models, (3) principled approaches for model selection, and (4) three real-world case studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T18:59:05Z)
• Relating by Contrasting: A Data-efficient Framework for Multimodal Generative Models [86.9292779620645]
  We develop a contrastive framework for generative model learning, allowing us to train the model not just by the commonality between modalities, but by the distinction between "related" and "unrelated" multimodal data. Under our proposed framework, the generative model can accurately identify related samples from unrelated ones, making it possible to make use of the plentiful unlabeled, unpaired multimodal data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-02T15:08:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.