A Short and General Duality Proof for Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.00362v4
- Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 00:49:35 GMT
- Title: A Short and General Duality Proof for Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization
- Authors: Luhao Zhang, Jincheng Yang, Rui Gao,
- Abstract summary: We present a general duality result for Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization that holds for any Kantorovich transport cost, measurable loss function, and nominal probability distribution.
We demonstrate that the interchangeability principle holds if and only if certain measurable projection and weak measurable selection conditions are satisfied.
- Score: 11.034091190797671
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: We present a general duality result for Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization that holds for any Kantorovich transport cost, measurable loss function, and nominal probability distribution. Assuming an interchangeability principle inherent in existing duality results, our proof only uses one-dimensional convex analysis. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the interchangeability principle holds if and only if certain measurable projection and weak measurable selection conditions are satisfied. To illustrate the broader applicability of our approach, we provide a rigorous treatment of duality results in distributionally robust Markov decision processes and distributionally robust multistage stochastic programming. Additionally, we extend our analysis to other problems such as infinity-Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization, risk-averse optimization, and globalized distributionally robust counterpart.
Related papers
- Contextual Optimization under Covariate Shift: A Robust Approach by Intersecting Wasserstein Balls [18.047245099229325]
We propose a distributionally robust approach that uses an ambiguity set by the intersection of two Wasserstein balls.
We demonstrate the strong empirical performance of our proposed models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-04T15:46:41Z) - A Unified Theory of Stochastic Proximal Point Methods without Smoothness [52.30944052987393]
Proximal point methods have attracted considerable interest owing to their numerical stability and robustness against imperfect tuning.
This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of a broad range of variations of the proximal point method (SPPM)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-24T21:09:19Z) - Universal generalization guarantees for Wasserstein distributionally robust models [10.036727981085223]
We present a novel proof technique that combines nonsmooth analysis rationale with classical concentration results.
Our approach is general enough to extend to the recent versions Wasserstein/Sinkhorn distributionally robust problems that involve (double) regularizations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-19T09:27:47Z) - An Inexact Halpern Iteration with Application to Distributionally Robust
Optimization [9.529117276663431]
We investigate the inexact variants of the scheme in both deterministic and deterministic convergence settings.
We show that by choosing the inexactness appropriately, the inexact schemes admit an $O(k-1) convergence rate in terms of the (expected) residue norm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-08T20:12:47Z) - Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Estimation in High Dimensions:
Performance Analysis and Optimal Hyperparameter Tuning [0.0]
We propose a Wasserstein distributionally robust estimation framework to estimate an unknown parameter from noisy linear measurements.
We focus on the task of analyzing the squared error performance of such estimators.
We show that the squared error can be recovered as the solution of a convex-concave optimization problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-27T13:02:59Z) - High Probability Complexity Bounds for Non-Smooth Stochastic Optimization with Heavy-Tailed Noise [51.31435087414348]
It is essential to theoretically guarantee that algorithms provide small objective residual with high probability.
Existing methods for non-smooth convex optimization have complexity bounds with dependence on confidence level.
We propose novel stepsize rules for two methods with gradient clipping.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-10T17:54:21Z) - Semi-Discrete Optimal Transport: Hardness, Regularization and Numerical
Solution [8.465228064780748]
We prove that computing the Wasserstein distance between a discrete probability measure supported on two points is already #P-hard.
We introduce a distributionally robust dual optimal transport problem whose objective function is smoothed with the most adverse disturbance distributions.
We show that smoothing the dual objective function is equivalent to regularizing the primal objective function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-10T18:53:59Z) - Robust, Accurate Stochastic Optimization for Variational Inference [68.83746081733464]
We show that common optimization methods lead to poor variational approximations if the problem is moderately large.
Motivated by these findings, we develop a more robust and accurate optimization framework by viewing the underlying algorithm as producing a Markov chain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-01T19:12:11Z) - Distributional Robustness and Regularization in Reinforcement Learning [62.23012916708608]
We introduce a new regularizer for empirical value functions and show that it lower bounds the Wasserstein distributionally robust value function.
It suggests using regularization as a practical tool for dealing with $textitexternal uncertainty$ in reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-05T19:56:23Z) - Distributionally Robust Bayesian Optimization [121.71766171427433]
We present a novel distributionally robust Bayesian optimization algorithm (DRBO) for zeroth-order, noisy optimization.
Our algorithm provably obtains sub-linear robust regret in various settings.
We demonstrate the robust performance of our method on both synthetic and real-world benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-20T22:04:30Z) - Distributionally Robust Bayesian Quadrature Optimization [60.383252534861136]
We study BQO under distributional uncertainty in which the underlying probability distribution is unknown except for a limited set of its i.i.d. samples.
A standard BQO approach maximizes the Monte Carlo estimate of the true expected objective given the fixed sample set.
We propose a novel posterior sampling based algorithm, namely distributionally robust BQO (DRBQO) for this purpose.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-19T12:00:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.