Contextual Optimization under Covariate Shift: A Robust Approach by Intersecting Wasserstein Balls

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.02426v1
• Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 15:46:41 GMT
• Title: Contextual Optimization under Covariate Shift: A Robust Approach by Intersecting Wasserstein Balls
• Authors: Tianyu Wang, Ningyuan Chen, Chun Wang,
• Abstract summary: We propose a distributionally robust approach that uses an ambiguity set by the intersection of two Wasserstein balls. We demonstrate the strong empirical performance of our proposed models.
• Score: 18.047245099229325
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In contextual optimization, a decision-maker observes historical samples of uncertain variables and associated concurrent covariates, without knowing their joint distribution. Given an additional covariate observation, the goal is to choose a decision that minimizes some operational costs. A prevalent issue here is covariate shift, where the marginal distribution of the new covariate differs from historical samples, leading to decision performance variations with nonparametric or parametric estimators. To address this, we propose a distributionally robust approach that uses an ambiguity set by the intersection of two Wasserstein balls, each centered on typical nonparametric or parametric distribution estimators. Computationally, we establish the tractable reformulation of this distributionally robust optimization problem. Statistically, we provide guarantees for our Wasserstein ball intersection approach under covariate shift by analyzing the measure concentration of the estimators. Furthermore, to reduce computational complexity, we employ a surrogate objective that maintains similar generalization guarantees. Through synthetic and empirical case studies on income prediction and portfolio optimization, we demonstrate the strong empirical performance of our proposed models.

Related papers

• Generalization Bounds of Surrogate Policies for Combinatorial Optimization Problems [61.580419063416734]
  A recent stream of structured learning approaches has improved the practical state of the art for a range of optimization problems. The key idea is to exploit the statistical distribution over instances instead of dealing with instances separately. In this article, we investigate methods that smooth the risk by perturbing the policy, which eases optimization and improves the generalization error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T12:00:30Z)
• A Geometric Unification of Distributionally Robust Covariance Estimators: Shrinking the Spectrum by Inflating the Ambiguity Set [20.166217494056916]
  We propose a principled approach to construct covariance estimators without imposing restrictive assumptions. We show that our robust estimators are efficiently computable and consistent. Numerical experiments based on synthetic and real data show that our robust estimators are competitive with state-of-the-art estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T15:01:18Z)
• Collaborative Heterogeneous Causal Inference Beyond Meta-analysis [68.4474531911361]
  We propose a collaborative inverse propensity score estimator for causal inference with heterogeneous data. Our method shows significant improvements over the methods based on meta-analysis when heterogeneity increases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T09:04:36Z)
• An Inexact Halpern Iteration with Application to Distributionally Robust Optimization [9.529117276663431]
  We investigate the inexact variants of the scheme in both deterministic and deterministic convergence settings. We show that by choosing the inexactness appropriately, the inexact schemes admit an $O(k-1) convergence rate in terms of the (expected) residue norm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T20:12:47Z)
• Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Estimation in High Dimensions: Performance Analysis and Optimal Hyperparameter Tuning [0.0]
  We propose a Wasserstein distributionally robust estimation framework to estimate an unknown parameter from noisy linear measurements. We focus on the task of analyzing the squared error performance of such estimators. We show that the squared error can be recovered as the solution of a convex-concave optimization problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-27T13:02:59Z)
• A Short and General Duality Proof for Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization [11.034091190797671]
  We present a general duality result for Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization that holds for any Kantorovich transport cost, measurable loss function, and nominal probability distribution. We demonstrate that the interchangeability principle holds if and only if certain measurable projection and weak measurable selection conditions are satisfied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-30T22:49:01Z)
• Variational Refinement for Importance Sampling Using the Forward Kullback-Leibler Divergence [77.06203118175335]
  Variational Inference (VI) is a popular alternative to exact sampling in Bayesian inference. Importance sampling (IS) is often used to fine-tune and de-bias the estimates of approximate Bayesian inference procedures. We propose a novel combination of optimization and sampling techniques for approximate Bayesian inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-30T11:00:24Z)
• Distributionally Robust Prescriptive Analytics with Wasserstein Distance [10.475438374386886]
  This paper proposes a new distributionally robust approach under Wasserstein ambiguity sets. We show that the nominal distribution converges to the actual conditional distribution under the Wasserstein distance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-10T13:08:17Z)
• Robust, Accurate Stochastic Optimization for Variational Inference [68.83746081733464]
  We show that common optimization methods lead to poor variational approximations if the problem is moderately large. Motivated by these findings, we develop a more robust and accurate optimization framework by viewing the underlying algorithm as producing a Markov chain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-01T19:12:11Z)
• A One-step Approach to Covariate Shift Adaptation [82.01909503235385]
  A default assumption in many machine learning scenarios is that the training and test samples are drawn from the same probability distribution. We propose a novel one-step approach that jointly learns the predictive model and the associated weights in one optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-08T11:35:47Z)
• Distributed Averaging Methods for Randomized Second Order Optimization [54.51566432934556]
  We consider distributed optimization problems where forming the Hessian is computationally challenging and communication is a bottleneck. We develop unbiased parameter averaging methods for randomized second order optimization that employ sampling and sketching of the Hessian. We also extend the framework of second order averaging methods to introduce an unbiased distributed optimization framework for heterogeneous computing systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-16T09:01:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.