Improving In-Context Few-Shot Learning via Self-Supervised Training

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.01703v1
• Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 18:01:07 GMT
• Title: Improving In-Context Few-Shot Learning via Self-Supervised Training
• Authors: Mingda Chen, Jingfei Du, Ramakanth Pasunuru, Todor Mihaylov, Srini Iyer, Veselin Stoyanov, Zornitsa Kozareva
• Abstract summary: We propose to use self-supervision in an intermediate training stage between pretraining and downstream few-shot usage. We find that the intermediate self-supervision stage produces models that outperform strong baselines.
• Score: 48.801037246764935
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Self-supervised pretraining has made few-shot learning possible for many NLP tasks. But the pretraining objectives are not typically adapted specifically for in-context few-shot learning. In this paper, we propose to use self-supervision in an intermediate training stage between pretraining and downstream few-shot usage with the goal to teach the model to perform in-context few shot learning. We propose and evaluate four self-supervised objectives on two benchmarks. We find that the intermediate self-supervision stage produces models that outperform strong baselines. Ablation study shows that several factors affect the downstream performance, such as the amount of training data and the diversity of the self-supervised objectives. Human-annotated cross-task supervision and self-supervision are complementary. Qualitative analysis suggests that the self-supervised-trained models are better at following task requirements.

Related papers

• Deciphering Cross-Modal Alignment in Large Vision-Language Models with Modality Integration Rate [118.37653302885607]
  We present the Modality Integration Rate (MIR), an effective, robust, and generalized metric to indicate the multi-modal pre-training quality of Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) MIR is indicative about training data selection, training strategy schedule, and model architecture design to get better pre-training results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:59:04Z)
• The Fine Line: Navigating Large Language Model Pretraining with Down-streaming Capability Analysis [27.310894780313618]
  This paper undertakes a comprehensive comparison of model capabilities at various pretraining intermediate checkpoints. We confirm that specific downstream metrics exhibit similar training dynamics across models of different sizes. In addition to our core findings, we've reproduced Amber and OpenLLaMA, releasing their intermediate checkpoints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T16:00:01Z)
• Entailment as Robust Self-Learner [14.86757876218415]
  We design a prompting strategy that formulates a number of different NLU tasks as contextual entailment. We propose the Simple Pseudo-Label Editing (SimPLE) algorithm for better pseudo-labeling quality in self-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T18:41:23Z)
• Comparative layer-wise analysis of self-supervised speech models [29.258085176788097]
  We measure acoustic, phonetic, and word-level properties encoded in individual layers, using a lightweight analysis tool based on canonical correlation analysis (CCA) We find that these properties evolve across layers differently depending on the model, and the variations relate to the choice of pre-training objective. We discover that CCA trends provide reliable guidance to choose layers of interest for downstream tasks and that single-layer performance often matches or improves upon using all layers, suggesting implications for more efficient use of pre-trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-08T00:59:05Z)
• Do Vision-and-Language Transformers Learn Grounded Predicate-Noun Dependencies? [0.06299766708197882]
  We create a new task targeted at evaluating understanding of predicate-noun dependencies in a controlled setup. We evaluate a range of state-of-the-art models and find that their performance on the task varies considerably. This study highlights that targeted and controlled evaluations are a crucial step for a precise and rigorous test of the multimodal knowledge of vision-and-language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-21T16:07:00Z)
• Forging Multiple Training Objectives for Pre-trained Language Models via Meta-Learning [97.28779163988833]
  Multiple pre-training objectives fill the vacancy of the understanding capability of single-objective language modeling. We propose textitMOMETAS, a novel adaptive sampler based on meta-learning, which learns the latent sampling pattern on arbitrary pre-training objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-19T04:38:26Z)
• Effective Adaptation in Multi-Task Co-Training for Unified Autonomous Driving [103.745551954983]
  In this paper, we investigate the transfer performance of various types of self-supervised methods, including MoCo and SimCLR, on three downstream tasks. We find that their performances are sub-optimal or even lag far behind the single-task baseline. We propose a simple yet effective pretrain-adapt-finetune paradigm for general multi-task training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-19T12:15:31Z)
• Unifying Language Learning Paradigms [96.35981503087567]
  We present a unified framework for pre-training models that are universally effective across datasets and setups. We show how different pre-training objectives can be cast as one another and how interpolating between different objectives can be effective. Our model also achieve strong results at in-context learning, outperforming 175B GPT-3 on zero-shot SuperGLUE and tripling the performance of T5-XXL on one-shot summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-10T19:32:20Z)
• Unsupervised Vision-and-Language Pre-training Without Parallel Images and Captions [92.47566804182338]
  We investigate if a strong V&L representation model can be learned through unsupervised pre-training without image-caption corpora. In particular, we propose to conduct mask-and-predict'' pre-training on text-only and image-only corpora. We find that such a simple approach performance close to a model pre-trained with aligned data, on four English V&L benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-24T08:17:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.