Do Vision-and-Language Transformers Learn Grounded Predicate-Noun Dependencies?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.12079v1
• Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 16:07:00 GMT
• Title: Do Vision-and-Language Transformers Learn Grounded Predicate-Noun Dependencies?
• Authors: Mitja Nikolaus, Emmanuelle Salin, Stephane Ayache, Abdellah Fourtassi, Benoit Favre
• Abstract summary: We create a new task targeted at evaluating understanding of predicate-noun dependencies in a controlled setup. We evaluate a range of state-of-the-art models and find that their performance on the task varies considerably. This study highlights that targeted and controlled evaluations are a crucial step for a precise and rigorous test of the multimodal knowledge of vision-and-language models.
• Score: 0.06299766708197882
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in vision-and-language modeling have seen the development of Transformer architectures that achieve remarkable performance on multimodal reasoning tasks. Yet, the exact capabilities of these black-box models are still poorly understood. While much of previous work has focused on studying their ability to learn meaning at the word-level, their ability to track syntactic dependencies between words has received less attention. We take a first step in closing this gap by creating a new multimodal task targeted at evaluating understanding of predicate-noun dependencies in a controlled setup. We evaluate a range of state-of-the-art models and find that their performance on the task varies considerably, with some models performing relatively well and others at chance level. In an effort to explain this variability, our analyses indicate that the quality (and not only sheer quantity) of pretraining data is essential. Additionally, the best performing models leverage fine-grained multimodal pretraining objectives in addition to the standard image-text matching objectives. This study highlights that targeted and controlled evaluations are a crucial step for a precise and rigorous test of the multimodal knowledge of vision-and-language models.

Related papers

• Cross-Modal Consistency in Multimodal Large Language Models [33.229271701817616]
  We introduce a novel concept termed cross-modal consistency. Our experimental findings reveal a pronounced inconsistency between the vision and language modalities within GPT-4V. Our research yields insights into the appropriate utilization of such models and hints at potential avenues for enhancing their design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T08:22:42Z)
• Multi-Modal Prompt Learning on Blind Image Quality Assessment [65.0676908930946]
  Image Quality Assessment (IQA) models benefit significantly from semantic information, which allows them to treat different types of objects distinctly. Traditional methods, hindered by a lack of sufficiently annotated data, have employed the CLIP image-text pretraining model as their backbone to gain semantic awareness. Recent approaches have attempted to address this mismatch using prompt technology, but these solutions have shortcomings. This paper introduces an innovative multi-modal prompt-based methodology for IQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T11:45:32Z)
• Corpus Considerations for Annotator Modeling and Scaling [9.263562546969695]
  We show that the commonly used user token model consistently outperforms more complex models. Our findings shed light on the relationship between corpus statistics and annotator modeling performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T22:27:24Z)
• Lost in Translation: When GPT-4V(ision) Can't See Eye to Eye with Text. A Vision-Language-Consistency Analysis of VLLMs and Beyond [7.760124498553333]
  We study whether vision-language models execute vision and language tasks consistently or independently. We introduce a systematic framework that quantifies the capability disparities between different modalities in the multi-modal setting. We introduce "Vision Description Prompting," a method that effectively improves performance in challenging vision-related tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:45:11Z)
• SINC: Self-Supervised In-Context Learning for Vision-Language Tasks [64.44336003123102]
  We propose a framework to enable in-context learning in large language models. A meta-model can learn on self-supervised prompts consisting of tailored demonstrations. Experiments show that SINC outperforms gradient-based methods in various vision-language tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-15T08:33:08Z)
• Meta Learning to Bridge Vision and Language Models for Multimodal Few-Shot Learning [38.37682598345653]
  We introduce a multimodal meta-learning approach to bridge the gap between vision and language models. We define a meta-mapper network, acting as a meta-learner, to efficiently bridge frozen large-scale vision and language models. We evaluate our approach on recently proposed multimodal few-shot benchmarks, measuring how rapidly the model can bind novel visual concepts to words.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T17:46:18Z)
• Localization vs. Semantics: Visual Representations in Unimodal and Multimodal Models [57.08925810659545]
  We conduct a comparative analysis of the visual representations in existing vision-and-language models and vision-only models. Our empirical observations suggest that vision-and-language models are better at label prediction tasks. We hope our study sheds light on the role of language in visual learning, and serves as an empirical guide for various pretrained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-01T05:00:18Z)
• Task Formulation Matters When Learning Continually: A Case Study in Visual Question Answering [58.82325933356066]
  Continual learning aims to train a model incrementally on a sequence of tasks without forgetting previous knowledge. We present a detailed study of how different settings affect performance for Visual Question Answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T19:12:58Z)
• Analyzing the Limits of Self-Supervision in Handling Bias in Language [52.26068057260399]
  We evaluate how well language models capture the semantics of four tasks for bias: diagnosis, identification, extraction and rephrasing. Our analyses indicate that language models are capable of performing these tasks to widely varying degrees across different bias dimensions, such as gender and political affiliation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T05:36:08Z)
• Behind the Scene: Revealing the Secrets of Pre-trained Vision-and-Language Models [65.19308052012858]
  Recent Transformer-based large-scale pre-trained models have revolutionized vision-and-language (V+L) research. We present VALUE, a set of meticulously designed probing tasks to decipher the inner workings of multimodal pre-training. Key observations: Pre-trained models exhibit a propensity for attending over text rather than images during inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-15T01:06:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.