Original or Translated? A Causal Analysis of the Impact of Translationese on Machine Translation Performance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.02293v1
• Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 19:17:55 GMT
• Title: Original or Translated? A Causal Analysis of the Impact of Translationese on Machine Translation Performance
• Authors: Jingwei Ni, Zhijing Jin, Markus Freitag, Mrinmaya Sachan, Bernhard Sch\"olkopf
• Abstract summary: Human-translated text displays distinct features from naturally written text in the same language. We find that existing work on translationese neglects some important factors and the conclusions are mostly correlational but not causal. We show that these two factors have a large causal effect on the MT performance.
• Score: 31.47795931399995
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Human-translated text displays distinct features from naturally written text in the same language. This phenomena, known as translationese, has been argued to confound the machine translation (MT) evaluation. Yet, we find that existing work on translationese neglects some important factors and the conclusions are mostly correlational but not causal. In this work, we collect CausalMT, a dataset where the MT training data are also labeled with the human translation directions. We inspect two critical factors, the train-test direction match (whether the human translation directions in the training and test sets are aligned), and data-model direction match (whether the model learns in the same direction as the human translation direction in the dataset). We show that these two factors have a large causal effect on the MT performance, in addition to the test-model direction mismatch highlighted by existing work on the impact of translationese. In light of our findings, we provide a set of suggestions for MT training and evaluation. Our code and data are at https://github.com/EdisonNi-hku/CausalMT

Related papers

• Context-Aware Machine Translation with Source Coreference Explanation [26.336947440529713]
  We propose a model that explains the decisions made for translation by predicting coreference features in the input. We evaluate our method in the WMT document-level translation task of English-German dataset, the English-Russian dataset, and the multilingual TED talk dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T12:41:00Z)
• An approach for mistranslation removal from popular dataset for Indic MT Task [5.4755933832880865]
  We propose an algorithm to remove mistranslations from the training corpus and evaluate its performance and efficiency. Two Indic languages (ILs), namely, Hindi (HIN) and Odia (ODI) are chosen for the experiment. The quality of the translations in the experiment is evaluated using standard metrics such as BLEU, METEOR, and RIBES.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T06:37:19Z)
• Evaluation of Chinese-English Machine Translation of Emotion-Loaded Microblog Texts: A Human Annotated Dataset for the Quality Assessment of Emotion Translation [7.858458986992082]
  In this paper, we focus on how current Machine Translation (MT) tools perform on the translation of emotion-loaded texts. We propose this evaluation framework based on the Multidimensional Quality Metrics (MQM) and perform a detailed error analysis of the MT outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T21:22:45Z)
• Extrinsic Evaluation of Machine Translation Metrics [78.75776477562087]
  It is unclear if automatic metrics are reliable at distinguishing good translations from bad translations at the sentence level. We evaluate the segment-level performance of the most widely used MT metrics (chrF, COMET, BERTScore, etc.) on three downstream cross-lingual tasks. Our experiments demonstrate that all metrics exhibit negligible correlation with the extrinsic evaluation of the downstream outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T14:39:58Z)
• Bridging the Data Gap between Training and Inference for Unsupervised Neural Machine Translation [49.916963624249355]
  A UNMT model is trained on the pseudo parallel data with translated source, and natural source sentences in inference. The source discrepancy between training and inference hinders the translation performance of UNMT models. We propose an online self-training approach, which simultaneously uses the pseudo parallel data natural source, translated target to mimic the inference scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-16T04:50:27Z)
• It is Not as Good as You Think! Evaluating Simultaneous Machine Translation on Interpretation Data [58.105938143865906]
  We argue that SiMT systems should be trained and tested on real interpretation data. Our results highlight the difference of up-to 13.83 BLEU score when SiMT models are evaluated on translation vs interpretation data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-11T12:27:07Z)
• Improving Multilingual Translation by Representation and Gradient Regularization [82.42760103045083]
  We propose a joint approach to regularize NMT models at both representation-level and gradient-level. Our results demonstrate that our approach is highly effective in both reducing off-target translation occurrences and improving zero-shot translation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-10T10:52:21Z)
• ChrEnTranslate: Cherokee-English Machine Translation Demo with Quality Estimation and Corrective Feedback [70.5469946314539]
  ChrEnTranslate is an online machine translation demonstration system for translation between English and an endangered language Cherokee. It supports both statistical and neural translation models as well as provides quality estimation to inform users of reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-30T17:58:54Z)
• On the Language Coverage Bias for Neural Machine Translation [81.81456880770762]
  Language coverage bias is important for neural machine translation (NMT) because the target-original training data is not well exploited in current practice. By carefully designing experiments, we provide comprehensive analyses of the language coverage bias in the training data. We propose two simple and effective approaches to alleviate the language coverage bias problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T01:55:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.