Revisiting Pretraining for Semi-Supervised Learning in the Low-Label Regime

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.03001v1
• Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 03:53:25 GMT
• Title: Revisiting Pretraining for Semi-Supervised Learning in the Low-Label Regime
• Authors: Xun Xu, Jingyi Liao, Lile Cai, Manh Cuong Nguyen, Kangkang Lu, Wanyue Zhang, Yasin Yazici, Chuan Sheng Foo
• Abstract summary: Semi-supervised learning (SSL) addresses the lack of labeled data by exploiting large unlabeled data through pseudolabeling. Recent studies combined finetuning (FT) from pretrained weights with SSL to mitigate the challenges and claimed superior results in the low-label regime.
• Score: 15.863530936691157
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Semi-supervised learning (SSL) addresses the lack of labeled data by exploiting large unlabeled data through pseudolabeling. However, in the extremely low-label regime, pseudo labels could be incorrect, a.k.a. the confirmation bias, and the pseudo labels will in turn harm the network training. Recent studies combined finetuning (FT) from pretrained weights with SSL to mitigate the challenges and claimed superior results in the low-label regime. In this work, we first show that the better pretrained weights brought in by FT account for the state-of-the-art performance, and importantly that they are universally helpful to off-the-shelf semi-supervised learners. We further argue that direct finetuning from pretrained weights is suboptimal due to covariate shift and propose a contrastive target pretraining step to adapt model weights towards target dataset. We carried out extensive experiments on both classification and segmentation tasks by doing target pretraining then followed by semi-supervised finetuning. The promising results validate the efficacy of target pretraining for SSL, in particular in the low-label regime.

Related papers

• Learning Label Refinement and Threshold Adjustment for Imbalanced Semi-Supervised Learning [6.904448748214652]
  Semi-supervised learning algorithms struggle when exposed to imbalanced training data. We introduce SEmi-supervised learning with pseudo-label optimization based on VALidation data. SEVAL adapts to specific tasks with improved pseudo-labels accuracy and ensures pseudo-labels correctness on a per-class basis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-07T13:46:22Z)
• Co-training for Low Resource Scientific Natural Language Inference [65.37685198688538]
  We propose a novel co-training method that assigns weights based on the training dynamics of the classifiers to the distantly supervised labels. By assigning importance weights instead of filtering out examples based on an arbitrary threshold on the predicted confidence, we maximize the usage of automatically labeled data. The proposed method obtains an improvement of 1.5% in Macro F1 over the distant supervision baseline, and substantial improvements over several other strong SSL baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T18:35:47Z)
• Progressive Feature Adjustment for Semi-supervised Learning from Pretrained Models [39.42802115580677]
  Semi-supervised learning (SSL) can leverage both labeled and unlabeled data to build a predictive model. Recent literature suggests that naively applying state-of-the-art SSL with a pretrained model fails to unleash the full potential of training data. We propose to use pseudo-labels from the unlabelled data to update the feature extractor that is less sensitive to incorrect labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-09T01:57:14Z)
• InPL: Pseudo-labeling the Inliers First for Imbalanced Semi-supervised Learning [34.062061310242385]
  We present a new perspective of pseudo-labeling for imbalanced semi-supervised learning (SSL) We measure whether an unlabeled sample is likely to be in-distribution'' or out-of-distribution'' Experiments demonstrate that our energy-based pseudo-labeling method, textbfInPL, significantly outperforms confidence-based methods on imbalanced SSL benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-13T16:45:41Z)
• PercentMatch: Percentile-based Dynamic Thresholding for Multi-Label Semi-Supervised Classification [64.39761523935613]
  We propose a percentile-based threshold adjusting scheme to dynamically alter the score thresholds of positive and negative pseudo-labels for each class during the training. We achieve strong performance on Pascal VOC2007 and MS-COCO datasets when compared to recent SSL methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-30T01:27:48Z)
• CaSP: Class-agnostic Semi-Supervised Pretraining for Detection and Segmentation [60.28924281991539]
  We propose a novel Class-agnostic Semi-supervised Pretraining (CaSP) framework to achieve a more favorable task-specificity balance. Using 3.6M unlabeled data, we achieve a remarkable performance gain of 4.7% over ImageNet-pretrained baseline on object detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-09T14:54:59Z)
• Self-Tuning for Data-Efficient Deep Learning [75.34320911480008]
  Self-Tuning is a novel approach to enable data-efficient deep learning. It unifies the exploration of labeled and unlabeled data and the transfer of a pre-trained model. It outperforms its SSL and TL counterparts on five tasks by sharp margins.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-25T14:56:19Z)
• In Defense of Pseudo-Labeling: An Uncertainty-Aware Pseudo-label Selection Framework for Semi-Supervised Learning [53.1047775185362]
  Pseudo-labeling (PL) is a general SSL approach that does not have this constraint but performs relatively poorly in its original formulation. We argue that PL underperforms due to the erroneous high confidence predictions from poorly calibrated models. We propose an uncertainty-aware pseudo-label selection (UPS) framework which improves pseudo labeling accuracy by drastically reducing the amount of noise encountered in the training process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-15T23:29:57Z)
• Distribution Aligning Refinery of Pseudo-label for Imbalanced Semi-supervised Learning [126.31716228319902]
  We develop Distribution Aligning Refinery of Pseudo-label (DARP) algorithm. We show that DARP is provably and efficiently compatible with state-of-the-art SSL schemes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-17T09:16:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.