Full-Reference Calibration-Free Image Quality Assessment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.12129v1
• Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 15:06:35 GMT
• Title: Full-Reference Calibration-Free Image Quality Assessment
• Authors: Elio D. Di Claudio, Paolo Giannitrapani and Giovanni Jacovitti
• Abstract summary: Full Reference (FR) techniques provide estimates linearly correlated with human scores without using calibration. The resulting calibration-free FR IQA methods are suited for applications where interoperability across different imaging systems and on different VDs is a major requirement.
• Score: 2.5782420501870287
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: One major problem of objective Image Quality Assessment (IQA) methods is the lack of linearity of their quality estimates with respect to scores expressed by human subjects. For this reason, usually IQA metrics undergo a calibration process based on subjective quality examples. However, example-based training makes generalization problematic, hampering result comparison across different applications and operative conditions. In this paper, new Full Reference (FR) techniques, providing estimates linearly correlated with human scores without using calibration are introduced. To reach this objective, these techniques are deeply rooted on principles and theoretical constraints. Restricting the interest on the IQA of the set of natural images, it is first recognized that application of estimation theory and psycho physical principles to images degraded by Gaussian blur leads to a so-called canonical IQA method, whose estimates are not only highly linearly correlated to subjective scores, but are also straightforwardly related to the Viewing Distance (VD). Then, it is shown that mainstream IQA methods can be reconducted to the canonical method applying a preliminary metric conversion based on a unique specimen image. The application of this scheme is then extended to a significant class of degraded images other than Gaussian blur, including noisy and compressed images. The resulting calibration-free FR IQA methods are suited for applications where comparability and interoperability across different imaging systems and on different VDs is a major requirement. A comparison of their statistical performance with respect to some conventional calibration prone methods is finally provided.

Related papers

• Sliced Maximal Information Coefficient: A Training-Free Approach for Image Quality Assessment Enhancement [12.628718661568048]
  We aim to explore a generalized human visual attention estimation strategy to mimic the process of human quality rating. In particular, we model human attention generation by measuring the statistical dependency between the degraded image and the reference image. Experimental results verify the performance of existing IQA models can be consistently improved when our attention module is incorporated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T11:55:32Z)
• Reference-Free Image Quality Metric for Degradation and Reconstruction Artifacts [2.5282283486446753]
  We develop a reference-free quality evaluation network, dubbed "Quality Factor (QF) Predictor" Our QF Predictor is a lightweight, fully convolutional network comprising seven layers. It receives JPEG compressed image patch with a random QF as input, is trained to accurately predict the corresponding QF.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T22:28:18Z)
• Contrastive Pre-Training with Multi-View Fusion for No-Reference Point Cloud Quality Assessment [49.36799270585947]
  No-reference point cloud quality assessment (NR-PCQA) aims to automatically evaluate the perceptual quality of distorted point clouds without available reference. We propose a novel contrastive pre-training framework tailored for PCQA (CoPA) Our method outperforms the state-of-the-art PCQA methods on popular benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T07:16:07Z)
• Pairwise Comparisons Are All You Need [22.798716660911833]
  Blind image quality assessment (BIQA) approaches often fall short in real-world scenarios due to their reliance on a generic quality standard applied uniformly across diverse images. This paper introduces PICNIQ, a pairwise comparison framework designed to bypass the limitations of conventional BIQA. By employing psychometric scaling algorithms, PICNIQ transforms pairwise comparisons into just-objectionable-difference (JOD) quality scores, offering a granular and interpretable measure of image quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-13T23:43:36Z)
• Comparison of No-Reference Image Quality Models via MAP Estimation in Diffusion Latents [99.19391983670569]
  We show that NR-IQA models can be plugged into the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation framework for image enhancement. Different NR-IQA models are likely to induce different enhanced images, which are ultimately subject to psychophysical testing. This leads to a new computational method for comparing NR-IQA models within the analysis-by-synthesis framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T03:35:41Z)
• PIQI: Perceptual Image Quality Index based on Ensemble of Gaussian Process Regression [2.9412539021452715]
  Perceptual Image Quality Index (PIQI) is proposed to assess the quality of digital images. The performance of the PIQI is checked on six benchmark databases and compared with twelve state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T06:44:17Z)
• Conformer and Blind Noisy Students for Improved Image Quality Assessment [80.57006406834466]
  Learning-based approaches for perceptual image quality assessment (IQA) usually require both the distorted and reference image for measuring the perceptual quality accurately. In this work, we explore the performance of transformer-based full-reference IQA models. We also propose a method for IQA based on semi-supervised knowledge distillation from full-reference teacher models into blind student models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-27T10:21:08Z)
• Learning Conditional Knowledge Distillation for Degraded-Reference Image Quality Assessment [157.1292674649519]
  We propose a practical solution named degraded-reference IQA (DR-IQA) DR-IQA exploits the inputs of IR models, degraded images, as references. Our results can even be close to the performance of full-reference settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-18T02:35:08Z)
• No-Reference Image Quality Assessment by Hallucinating Pristine Features [24.35220427707458]
  We propose a no-reference (NR) image quality assessment (IQA) method via feature level pseudo-reference (PR) hallucination. The effectiveness of our proposed method is demonstrated on four popular IQA databases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-09T16:48:34Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware Blind Image Quality Assessment in the Laboratory and Wild [98.48284827503409]
  We develop a textitunified BIQA model and an approach of training it for both synthetic and realistic distortions. We employ the fidelity loss to optimize a deep neural network for BIQA over a large number of such image pairs. Experiments on six IQA databases show the promise of the learned method in blindly assessing image quality in the laboratory and wild.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-28T13:35:23Z)
• MetaIQA: Deep Meta-learning for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment [73.55944459902041]
  This paper presents a no-reference IQA metric based on deep meta-learning. We first collect a number of NR-IQA tasks for different distortions. Then meta-learning is adopted to learn the prior knowledge shared by diversified distortions. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed metric outperforms the state-of-the-arts by a large margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-11T23:36:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.