ToKen: Task Decomposition and Knowledge Infusion for Few-Shot Hate Speech Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.12495v2
• Date: Sat, 20 May 2023 17:11:44 GMT
• Title: ToKen: Task Decomposition and Knowledge Infusion for Few-Shot Hate Speech Detection
• Authors: Badr AlKhamissi, Faisal Ladhak, Srini Iyer, Ves Stoyanov, Zornitsa Kozareva, Xian Li, Pascale Fung, Lambert Mathias, Asli Celikyilmaz, Mona Diab
• Abstract summary: We frame this problem as a few-shot learning task, and show significant gains with decomposing the task into its "constituent" parts. In addition, we see that infusing knowledge from reasoning datasets (e.g. Atomic 2020) improves the performance even further.
• Score: 85.68684067031909
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Hate speech detection is complex; it relies on commonsense reasoning, knowledge of stereotypes, and an understanding of social nuance that differs from one culture to the next. It is also difficult to collect a large-scale hate speech annotated dataset. In this work, we frame this problem as a few-shot learning task, and show significant gains with decomposing the task into its "constituent" parts. In addition, we see that infusing knowledge from reasoning datasets (e.g. Atomic2020) improves the performance even further. Moreover, we observe that the trained models generalize to out-of-distribution datasets, showing the superiority of task decomposition and knowledge infusion compared to previously used methods. Concretely, our method outperforms the baseline by 17.83% absolute gain in the 16-shot case.

Related papers

• Generalization v.s. Memorization: Tracing Language Models' Capabilities Back to Pretraining Data [76.90128359866462]
  We introduce an extended concept of memorization, distributional memorization, which measures the correlation between the output probabilities and the pretraining data frequency. This study demonstrates that memorization plays a larger role in simpler, knowledge-intensive tasks, while generalization is the key for harder, reasoning-based tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T21:24:40Z)
• Relate to Predict: Towards Task-Independent Knowledge Representations for Reinforcement Learning [11.245432408899092]
  Reinforcement Learning can enable agents to learn complex tasks. It is difficult to interpret the knowledge and reuse it across tasks. In this paper, we introduce an inductive bias for explicit object-centered knowledge separation. We show that the degree of explicitness in knowledge separation correlates with faster learning, better accuracy, better generalization, and better interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-10T13:33:56Z)
• Combating high variance in Data-Scarce Implicit Hate Speech Classification [0.0]
  We develop a novel RoBERTa-based model that achieves state-of-the-art performance. In this paper, we explore various optimization and regularization techniques and develop a novel RoBERTa-based model that achieves state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-29T13:45:21Z)
• An Empirical Investigation of Commonsense Self-Supervision with Knowledge Graphs [67.23285413610243]
  Self-supervision based on the information extracted from large knowledge graphs has been shown to improve the generalization of language models. We study the effect of knowledge sampling strategies and sizes that can be used to generate synthetic data for adapting language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-21T19:49:04Z)
• Deep Learning for Hate Speech Detection: A Comparative Study [54.42226495344908]
  We present here a large-scale empirical comparison of deep and shallow hate-speech detection methods. Our goal is to illuminate progress in the area, and identify strengths and weaknesses in the current state-of-the-art. In doing so we aim to provide guidance as to the use of hate-speech detection in practice, quantify the state-of-the-art, and identify future research directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-19T03:48:20Z)
• MetaKernel: Learning Variational Random Features with Limited Labels [120.90737681252594]
  Few-shot learning deals with the fundamental and challenging problem of learning from a few annotated samples, while being able to generalize well on new tasks. We propose meta-learning kernels with random Fourier features for few-shot learning, we call Meta Kernel.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-08T21:24:09Z)
• AngryBERT: Joint Learning Target and Emotion for Hate Speech Detection [5.649040805759824]
  This paper proposes a novel multitask learning-based model, AngryBERT, which jointly learns hate speech detection with sentiment classification and target identification as secondary relevant tasks. Experiment results show that AngryBERT outperforms state-of-the-art single-task-learning and multitask learning baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-14T16:17:26Z)
• Probing Linguistic Features of Sentence-Level Representations in Neural Relation Extraction [80.38130122127882]
  We introduce 14 probing tasks targeting linguistic properties relevant to neural relation extraction (RE) We use them to study representations learned by more than 40 different encoder architecture and linguistic feature combinations trained on two datasets. We find that the bias induced by the architecture and the inclusion of linguistic features are clearly expressed in the probing task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-17T09:17:40Z)
• Stereotypical Bias Removal for Hate Speech Detection Task using Knowledge-based Generalizations [16.304516254043865]
  We study bias mitigation from unstructured text data for hate speech detection. We propose novel methods leveraging knowledge-based generalizations for bias-free learning. Our experiments with two real-world datasets, a Wikipedia Talk Pages dataset and a Twitter dataset, show that the use of knowledge-based generalizations results in better performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-15T18:17:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.