Revisiting Calibration for Question Answering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.12507v1
• Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 05:49:56 GMT
• Title: Revisiting Calibration for Question Answering
• Authors: Chenglei Si, Chen Zhao, Sewon Min, Jordan Boyd-Graber
• Abstract summary: We argue that the traditional evaluation of calibration does not reflect usefulness of the model confidence. We propose a new calibration metric, MacroCE, that better captures whether the model assigns low confidence to wrong predictions and high confidence to correct predictions.
• Score: 16.54743762235555
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Model calibration aims to adjust (calibrate) models' confidence so that they match expected accuracy. We argue that the traditional evaluation of calibration (expected calibration error; ECE) does not reflect usefulness of the model confidence. For example, after conventional temperature scaling, confidence scores become similar for all predictions, which makes it hard for users to distinguish correct predictions from wrong ones, even though it achieves low ECE. Building on those observations, we propose a new calibration metric, MacroCE, that better captures whether the model assigns low confidence to wrong predictions and high confidence to correct predictions. We examine various conventional calibration methods including temperature scaling, feature-based classifier, neural answer reranking, and label smoothing, all of which do not bring significant gains under our new MacroCE metric. Towards more effective calibration, we propose a new calibration method based on the model's prediction consistency along the training trajectory. This new method, which we name as consistency calibration, shows promise for better calibration.

Related papers

• Feature Clipping for Uncertainty Calibration [24.465567005078135]
  Modern deep neural networks (DNNs) often suffer from overconfidence, leading to miscalibration. We propose a novel post-hoc calibration method called feature clipping (FC) to address this issue. FC involves clipping feature values to a specified threshold, effectively increasing entropy in high calibration error samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T06:44:35Z)
• A Confidence Interval for the $\ell_2$ Expected Calibration Error [35.88784957918326]
  We develop confidence intervals $ell$ Expected the Error (ECE) We consider top-1-to-$k$ calibration, which includes both the popular notion of confidence calibration as well as calibration. For a debiased estimator of the ECE, we show normality, but with different convergence rates and variances for calibrated and misd models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T20:00:08Z)
• Optimizing Calibration by Gaining Aware of Prediction Correctness [30.619608580138802]
  Cross-Entropy (CE) loss is widely used for calibrator training, which enforces the model to increase confidence on the ground truth class. We propose a new post-hoc calibration objective derived from the aim of calibration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T17:25:43Z)
• Calibration by Distribution Matching: Trainable Kernel Calibration Metrics [56.629245030893685]
  We introduce kernel-based calibration metrics that unify and generalize popular forms of calibration for both classification and regression. These metrics admit differentiable sample estimates, making it easy to incorporate a calibration objective into empirical risk minimization. We provide intuitive mechanisms to tailor calibration metrics to a decision task, and enforce accurate loss estimation and no regret decisions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T06:19:40Z)
• Calibration of Neural Networks [77.34726150561087]
  This paper presents a survey of confidence calibration problems in the context of neural networks. We analyze problem statement, calibration definitions, and different approaches to evaluation. Empirical experiments cover various datasets and models, comparing calibration methods according to different criteria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-19T20:27:51Z)
• Sample-dependent Adaptive Temperature Scaling for Improved Calibration [95.7477042886242]
  Post-hoc approach to compensate for neural networks being wrong is to perform temperature scaling. We propose to predict a different temperature value for each input, allowing us to adjust the mismatch between confidence and accuracy. We test our method on the ResNet50 and WideResNet28-10 architectures using the CIFAR10/100 and Tiny-ImageNet datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-13T14:13:49Z)
• T-Cal: An optimal test for the calibration of predictive models [49.11538724574202]
  We consider detecting mis-calibration of predictive models using a finite validation dataset as a hypothesis testing problem. detecting mis-calibration is only possible when the conditional probabilities of the classes are sufficiently smooth functions of the predictions. We propose T-Cal, a minimax test for calibration based on a de-biased plug-in estimator of the $ell$-Expected Error (ECE)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T16:58:54Z)
• Parameterized Temperature Scaling for Boosting the Expressive Power in Post-Hoc Uncertainty Calibration [57.568461777747515]
  We introduce a novel calibration method, Parametrized Temperature Scaling (PTS) We demonstrate that the performance of accuracy-preserving state-of-the-art post-hoc calibrators is limited by their intrinsic expressive power. We show with extensive experiments that our novel accuracy-preserving approach consistently outperforms existing algorithms across a large number of model architectures, datasets and metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-24T10:18:30Z)
• Localized Calibration: Metrics and Recalibration [133.07044916594361]
  We propose a fine-grained calibration metric that spans the gap between fully global and fully individualized calibration. We then introduce a localized recalibration method, LoRe, that improves the LCE better than existing recalibration methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T07:22:12Z)
• Mitigating Bias in Calibration Error Estimation [28.46667300490605]
  We introduce a simulation framework that allows us to empirically show that ECE_bin can systematically underestimate or overestimate the true calibration error. We propose a simple alternative calibration error metric, ECE_sweep, in which the number of bins is chosen to be as large as possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-15T23:28:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.