Optimizing Calibration by Gaining Aware of Prediction Correctness
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13016v2
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 03:25:25 GMT
- Title: Optimizing Calibration by Gaining Aware of Prediction Correctness
- Authors: Yuchi Liu, Lei Wang, Yuli Zou, James Zou, Liang Zheng,
- Abstract summary: Cross-Entropy (CE) loss is widely used for calibrator training, which enforces the model to increase confidence on the ground truth class.
We propose a new post-hoc calibration objective derived from the aim of calibration.
- Score: 30.619608580138802
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Model calibration aims to align confidence with prediction correctness. The Cross-Entropy (CE) loss is widely used for calibrator training, which enforces the model to increase confidence on the ground truth class. However, we find the CE loss has intrinsic limitations. For example, for a narrow misclassification, a calibrator trained by the CE loss often produces high confidence on the wrongly predicted class (e.g., a test sample is wrongly classified and its softmax score on the ground truth class is around 0.4), which is undesirable. In this paper, we propose a new post-hoc calibration objective derived from the aim of calibration. Intuitively, the proposed objective function asks that the calibrator decrease model confidence on wrongly predicted samples and increase confidence on correctly predicted samples. Because a sample itself has insufficient ability to indicate correctness, we use its transformed versions (e.g., rotated, greyscaled and color-jittered) during calibrator training. Trained on an in-distribution validation set and tested with isolated, individual test samples, our method achieves competitive calibration performance on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution test sets compared with the state of the art. Further, our analysis points out the difference between our method and commonly used objectives such as CE loss and mean square error loss, where the latters sometimes deviates from the calibration aim.
Related papers
- A Confidence Interval for the $\ell_2$ Expected Calibration Error [35.88784957918326]
We develop confidence intervals $ell$ Expected the Error (ECE)
We consider top-1-to-$k$ calibration, which includes both the popular notion of confidence calibration as well as calibration.
For a debiased estimator of the ECE, we show normality, but with different convergence rates and variances for calibrated and misd models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-16T20:00:08Z) - Towards Certification of Uncertainty Calibration under Adversarial Attacks [96.48317453951418]
We show that attacks can significantly harm calibration, and thus propose certified calibration as worst-case bounds on calibration under adversarial perturbations.
We propose novel calibration attacks and demonstrate how they can improve model calibration through textitadversarial calibration training
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-22T18:52:09Z) - Calibration by Distribution Matching: Trainable Kernel Calibration
Metrics [56.629245030893685]
We introduce kernel-based calibration metrics that unify and generalize popular forms of calibration for both classification and regression.
These metrics admit differentiable sample estimates, making it easy to incorporate a calibration objective into empirical risk minimization.
We provide intuitive mechanisms to tailor calibration metrics to a decision task, and enforce accurate loss estimation and no regret decisions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-31T06:19:40Z) - Two Sides of Miscalibration: Identifying Over and Under-Confidence
Prediction for Network Calibration [1.192436948211501]
Proper confidence calibration of deep neural networks is essential for reliable predictions in safety-critical tasks.
Miscalibration can lead to model over-confidence and/or under-confidence.
We introduce a novel metric, a miscalibration score, to identify the overall and class-wise calibration status.
We use the class-wise miscalibration score as a proxy to design a calibration technique that can tackle both over and under-confidence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-06T17:59:14Z) - On Calibrating Semantic Segmentation Models: Analyses and An Algorithm [51.85289816613351]
We study the problem of semantic segmentation calibration.
Model capacity, crop size, multi-scale testing, and prediction correctness have impact on calibration.
We propose a simple, unifying, and effective approach, namely selective scaling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-22T22:05:16Z) - Revisiting Calibration for Question Answering [16.54743762235555]
We argue that the traditional evaluation of calibration does not reflect usefulness of the model confidence.
We propose a new calibration metric, MacroCE, that better captures whether the model assigns low confidence to wrong predictions and high confidence to correct predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-25T05:49:56Z) - T-Cal: An optimal test for the calibration of predictive models [49.11538724574202]
We consider detecting mis-calibration of predictive models using a finite validation dataset as a hypothesis testing problem.
detecting mis-calibration is only possible when the conditional probabilities of the classes are sufficiently smooth functions of the predictions.
We propose T-Cal, a minimax test for calibration based on a de-biased plug-in estimator of the $ell$-Expected Error (ECE)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-03T16:58:54Z) - Bayesian Confidence Calibration for Epistemic Uncertainty Modelling [4.358626952482686]
We introduce a framework to obtain confidence estimates in conjunction with an uncertainty of the calibration method.
We achieve state-of-the-art calibration performance for object detection calibration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-21T10:53:16Z) - Localized Calibration: Metrics and Recalibration [133.07044916594361]
We propose a fine-grained calibration metric that spans the gap between fully global and fully individualized calibration.
We then introduce a localized recalibration method, LoRe, that improves the LCE better than existing recalibration methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-22T07:22:12Z) - Unsupervised Calibration under Covariate Shift [92.02278658443166]
We introduce the problem of calibration under domain shift and propose an importance sampling based approach to address it.
We evaluate and discuss the efficacy of our method on both real-world datasets and synthetic datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-29T21:50:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.