Terms-we-Serve-with: a feminist-inspired social imaginary for improved
transparency and engagement in AI
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.02492v1
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 10:50:27 GMT
- Title: Terms-we-Serve-with: a feminist-inspired social imaginary for improved
transparency and engagement in AI
- Authors: Bogdana Rakova, Megan Ma, Renee Shelby
- Abstract summary: Terms-we-Serve-with (TwSw) social, computational, and legal contract for restructuring power asymmetries and center-periphery dynamics.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Power and information asymmetries between people and digital technology
companies have predominantly been legitimized through contractual agreements
that have failed to provide diverse people with meaningful consent and
contestability. We offer an interdisciplinary multidimensional perspective on
the future of regulatory frameworks - the Terms-we-Serve-with (TwSw) social,
computational, and legal contract for restructuring power asymmetries and
center-periphery dynamics to enable improved human agency in individual and
collective experiences of algorithmic harms.
Related papers
- Distributed Governance: a Principal-Agent Approach to Data Governance --
Part 1 Background & Core Definitions [0.0]
We provide a model to evolve Data governance toward Information governance.
This model bridges digital and non-digital information exchange.
We provide a framework to deploy a distributed governance model embedding checks and balance between human and technological governance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-14T17:12:07Z) - Federated Learning-Empowered AI-Generated Content in Wireless Networks [58.48381827268331]
Federated learning (FL) can be leveraged to improve learning efficiency and achieve privacy protection for AIGC.
We present FL-based techniques for empowering AIGC, and aim to enable users to generate diverse, personalized, and high-quality content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-14T04:13:11Z) - A multilevel framework for AI governance [6.230751621285321]
We propose a multilevel governance approach that involves governments, corporations, and citizens.
The levels of governance combined with the dimensions of trust in AI provide practical insights that can be used to further enhance user experiences and inform public policy related to AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-04T03:59:16Z) - Stronger Together: on the Articulation of Ethical Charters, Legal Tools,
and Technical Documentation in ML [5.433040083728602]
The need for accountability of the people behind AI systems can be addressed by leveraging processes in three fields of study: ethics, law, and computer science.
We first contrast notions of compliance in the ethical, legal, and technical fields.
We then focus on the role of values in articulating the synergies between the fields.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-09T15:35:31Z) - Semantic Information Marketing in The Metaverse: A Learning-Based
Contract Theory Framework [68.8725783112254]
We address the problem of designing incentive mechanisms by a virtual service provider (VSP) to hire sensing IoT devices to sell their sensing data.
Due to the limited bandwidth, we propose to use semantic extraction algorithms to reduce the delivered data by the sensing IoT devices.
We propose a novel iterative contract design and use a new variant of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) to solve the modelled multi-dimensional contract problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-22T15:52:37Z) - Privacy-Preserving Joint Edge Association and Power Optimization for the
Internet of Vehicles via Federated Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [74.53077322713548]
We investigate the privacy-preserving joint edge association and power allocation problem.
The proposed solution strikes a compelling trade-off, while preserving a higher privacy level than the state-of-the-art solutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-26T10:09:23Z) - Operationalizing Digital Self Determination [0.0]
We live in an era of datafication, in which life is increasingly quantified and transformed into intelligence for private or public benefit.
Existing methods to limit asymmetries (e.g., consent) have limitations to adequately address the challenges at hand.
A new principle and practice of digital self-determination (DSD) is therefore required.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-15T22:28:51Z) - Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary
Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them.
We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives.
We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z) - Normative Disagreement as a Challenge for Cooperative AI [56.34005280792013]
We argue that typical cooperation-inducing learning algorithms fail to cooperate in bargaining problems.
We develop a class of norm-adaptive policies and show in experiments that these significantly increase cooperation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-27T11:37:42Z) - Regulation conform DLT-operable payment adapter based on trustless -
justified trust combined generalized state channels [77.34726150561087]
Economy of Things (EoT) will be based on software agents running on peer-to-peer trustless networks.
We give an overview of current solutions that differ in their fundamental values and technological possibilities.
We propose to combine the strengths of the crypto based, decentralized trustless elements with established and well regulated means of payment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-03T10:45:55Z) - Transforming Commercial Contracts through Computable Contracting [0.0]
This paper examines the concept of computable contracts as objects that are understandable by both humans and computers.
It presents a framework that unifies a range of technologies and approaches that collectively will help to make computable contracting a reality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-23T17:20:42Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.