A multilevel framework for AI governance
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.03198v2
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:27:55 GMT
- Title: A multilevel framework for AI governance
- Authors: Hyesun Choung, Prabu David, John S. Seberger
- Abstract summary: We propose a multilevel governance approach that involves governments, corporations, and citizens.
The levels of governance combined with the dimensions of trust in AI provide practical insights that can be used to further enhance user experiences and inform public policy related to AI.
- Score: 6.230751621285321
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: To realize the potential benefits and mitigate potential risks of AI, it is
necessary to develop a framework of governance that conforms to ethics and
fundamental human values. Although several organizations have issued guidelines
and ethical frameworks for trustworthy AI, without a mediating governance
structure, these ethical principles will not translate into practice. In this
paper, we propose a multilevel governance approach that involves three groups
of interdependent stakeholders: governments, corporations, and citizens. We
examine their interrelationships through dimensions of trust, such as
competence, integrity, and benevolence. The levels of governance combined with
the dimensions of trust in AI provide practical insights that can be used to
further enhance user experiences and inform public policy related to AI.
Related papers
- Engineering Trustworthy AI: A Developer Guide for Empirical Risk Minimization [53.80919781981027]
Key requirements for trustworthy AI can be translated into design choices for the components of empirical risk minimization.
We hope to provide actionable guidance for building AI systems that meet emerging standards for trustworthiness of AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-25T07:53:32Z) - Generative AI Needs Adaptive Governance [0.0]
generative AI challenges the notions of governance, trust, and human agency.
This paper argues that generative AI calls for adaptive governance.
We outline actors, roles, as well as both shared and actors-specific policy activities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-06T23:47:14Z) - Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power.
We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z) - AI Ethics and Governance in Practice: An Introduction [0.4091406230302996]
AI systems may have transformative and long-term effects on individuals and society.
To manage these impacts responsibly, considerations of AI ethics and governance must be a first priority.
We introduce and describe our PBG Framework, a multi-tiered governance model that enables project teams to integrate ethical values and practical principles into their innovation practices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-19T22:43:19Z) - Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair
Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
"Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture.
This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias.
In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z) - Designing for Responsible Trust in AI Systems: A Communication
Perspective [56.80107647520364]
We draw from communication theories and literature on trust in technologies to develop a conceptual model called MATCH.
We highlight transparency and interaction as AI systems' affordances that present a wide range of trustworthiness cues to users.
We propose a checklist of requirements to help technology creators identify appropriate cues to use.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-29T00:14:33Z) - Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practices [44.67324097900778]
Many current AI systems were found vulnerable to imperceptible attacks, biased against underrepresented groups, lacking in user privacy protection, etc.
In this review, we strive to provide AI practitioners a comprehensive guide towards building trustworthy AI systems.
To unify the current fragmented approaches towards trustworthy AI, we propose a systematic approach that considers the entire lifecycle of AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-04T03:20:39Z) - A Framework for Ethical AI at the United Nations [0.0]
This paper aims to provide an overview of the ethical concerns in artificial intelligence (AI) and the framework that is needed to mitigate those risks.
It suggests a practical path to ensure the development and use of AI at the United Nations (UN) aligns with our ethical values.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-09T23:44:37Z) - The Sanction of Authority: Promoting Public Trust in AI [4.729969944853141]
We argue that public distrust of AI originates from the under-development of a regulatory ecosystem that would guarantee the trustworthiness of the AIs that pervade society.
We elaborate the pivotal role of externally auditable AI documentation within this model and the work to be done to ensure it is effective.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-22T22:01:30Z) - Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and
Goals of Human Trust in AI [55.4046755826066]
We discuss a model of trust inspired by, but not identical to, sociology's interpersonal trust (i.e., trust between people)
We incorporate a formalization of 'contractual trust', such that trust between a user and an AI is trust that some implicit or explicit contract will hold.
We discuss how to design trustworthy AI, how to evaluate whether trust has manifested, and whether it is warranted.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-15T03:07:23Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.