DLT Compliance Reporting
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.03270v1
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 11:19:15 GMT
- Title: DLT Compliance Reporting
- Authors: Henrik Axelsen, Johannes Rude Jensen, Omri Ross
- Abstract summary: The IS discourse on the potential of distributed ledger technology (DLT) in the financial services has grown at a tremendous pace in recent years.
Yet, little has been said about the related implications for the costly and highly regulated process of compliance reporting.
We employ the design science research methodology (DSR) in the design, development, and evaluation of an artefact, enabling the automated collection and enrichment of transactional data.
Our findings indicate that DLT may facilitate the automation of key compliance processes through the implementation of a "pull-model", in which regulators can access compliance data in near real-time to stage aggregate exposures
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The IS discourse on the potential of distributed ledger technology (DLT) in
the financial services has grown at a tremendous pace in recent years. Yet,
little has been said about the related implications for the costly and highly
regulated process of compliance reporting. Working with a group of
representatives from industry and regulatory authorities, we employ the design
science research methodology (DSR) in the design, development, and evaluation
of an artefact, enabling the automated collection and enrichment of
transactional data. Our findings indicate that DLT may facilitate the
automation of key compliance processes through the implementation of a
"pull-model", in which regulators can access compliance data in near real-time
to stage aggregate exposures at the supranational level. Generalizing our
preliminary results, we present four propositions on the implications of DLT in
compliance. The findings contribute new practical insights on the topic of
compliance to the growing IS discourse on DLT.
Related papers
- COMPL-AI Framework: A Technical Interpretation and LLM Benchmarking Suite for the EU Artificial Intelligence Act [40.233017376716305]
The EU's Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) is a significant step towards responsible AI development.
It lacks clear technical interpretation, making it difficult to assess models' compliance.
This work presents COMPL-AI, a comprehensive framework consisting of the first technical interpretation of the Act.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T14:23:51Z) - Making Large Language Models Better Planners with Reasoning-Decision Alignment [70.5381163219608]
We motivate an end-to-end decision-making model based on multimodality-augmented LLM.
We propose a reasoning-decision alignment constraint between the paired CoTs and planning results.
We dub our proposed large language planners with reasoning-decision alignment as RDA-Driver.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-25T16:43:47Z) - Sustainable Diffusion-based Incentive Mechanism for Generative AI-driven Digital Twins in Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems [65.22300383287904]
Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPSs) are an integral component of modern manufacturing and industries.
By digitizing data throughout the product life cycle, Digital Twins (DTs) in ICPSs enable a shift from current industrial infrastructures to intelligent and adaptive infrastructures.
mechanisms that leverage sensing Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) devices to share data for the construction of DTs are susceptible to adverse selection problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-02T10:47:10Z) - Empowering Prior to Court Legal Analysis: A Transparent and Accessible Dataset for Defensive Statement Classification and Interpretation [5.646219481667151]
This paper introduces a novel dataset tailored for classification of statements made during police interviews, prior to court proceedings.
We introduce a fine-tuned DistilBERT model that achieves state-of-the-art performance in distinguishing truthful from deceptive statements.
We also present an XAI interface that empowers both legal professionals and non-specialists to interact with and benefit from our system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-17T11:22:27Z) - Enhancing Legal Compliance and Regulation Analysis with Large Language Models [0.0]
This research explores the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) to accurately classify legal provisions and automate compliance checks.
Our findings demonstrate promising results, indicating LLMs' significant potential to enhance legal compliance and regulatory analysis efficiency, notably by reducing manual workload and improving accuracy within reasonable time financial constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-26T16:40:49Z) - Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Survey [52.86322823501338]
We make a systematic review of the literature, including the general methodology of IT, the construction of IT datasets, the training of IT models, and applications to different modalities, domains and applications.
We also review the potential pitfalls of IT along with criticism against it, along with efforts pointing out current deficiencies of existing strategies and suggest some avenues for fruitful research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-21T15:35:16Z) - Auditing large language models: a three-layered approach [0.0]
Large language models (LLMs) represent a major advance in artificial intelligence (AI) research.
LLMs are also coupled with significant ethical and social challenges.
Previous research has pointed towards auditing as a promising governance mechanism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-16T18:55:21Z) - Relational Action Bases: Formalization, Effective Safety Verification,
and Invariants (Extended Version) [67.99023219822564]
We introduce the general framework of relational action bases (RABs)
RABs generalize existing models by lifting both restrictions.
We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach on a benchmark of data-aware business processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-12T17:03:50Z) - An Uncommon Task: Participatory Design in Legal AI [64.54460979588075]
We examine a notable yet understudied AI design process in the legal domain that took place over a decade ago.
We show how an interactive simulation methodology allowed computer scientists and lawyers to become co-designers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-08T15:46:52Z) - Denoising Relation Extraction from Document-level Distant Supervision [92.76441007250197]
We propose a novel pre-trained model for DocRE, which denoises the document-level DS data via multiple pre-training tasks.
Experimental results on the large-scale DocRE benchmark show that our model can capture useful information from noisy DS data and achieve promising results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-08T02:05:25Z) - Real Time Reasoning in OWL2 for GDPR Compliance [0.0]
We show how knowledge representation and reasoning techniques can be used to support organizations in complying with the new European data protection regulation.
This work is carried out in a European H2020 project called SPECIAL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-15T15:50:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.