Enhancing Legal Compliance and Regulation Analysis with Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.17522v1
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 16:40:49 GMT
- Title: Enhancing Legal Compliance and Regulation Analysis with Large Language Models
- Authors: Shabnam Hassani,
- Abstract summary: This research explores the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) to accurately classify legal provisions and automate compliance checks.
Our findings demonstrate promising results, indicating LLMs' significant potential to enhance legal compliance and regulatory analysis efficiency, notably by reducing manual workload and improving accuracy within reasonable time financial constraints.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: This research explores the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) for automating the extraction of requirement-related legal content in the food safety domain and checking legal compliance of regulatory artifacts. With Industry 4.0 revolutionizing the food industry and with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) reshaping privacy policies and data processing agreements, there is a growing gap between regulatory analysis and recent technological advancements. This study aims to bridge this gap by leveraging LLMs, namely BERT and GPT models, to accurately classify legal provisions and automate compliance checks. Our findings demonstrate promising results, indicating LLMs' significant potential to enhance legal compliance and regulatory analysis efficiency, notably by reducing manual workload and improving accuracy within reasonable time and financial constraints.
Related papers
- TRACE: TRansformer-based Attribution using Contrastive Embeddings in LLMs [50.259001311894295]
We propose a novel TRansformer-based Attribution framework using Contrastive Embeddings called TRACE.
We show that TRACE significantly improves the ability to attribute sources accurately, making it a valuable tool for enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of large language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-06T07:19:30Z) - ConU: Conformal Uncertainty in Large Language Models with Correctness Coverage Guarantees [68.33498595506941]
Uncertainty quantification in natural language generation (NLG) tasks remains an open challenge.
This study investigates adapting conformal prediction (CP), which can convert any measure of uncertainty into rigorous theoretical guarantees.
We propose a sampling-based uncertainty measure leveraging self-consistency and develop a conformal uncertainty criterion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-29T17:33:07Z) - InternLM-Law: An Open Source Chinese Legal Large Language Model [72.2589401309848]
InternLM-Law is a specialized LLM tailored for addressing diverse legal queries related to Chinese laws.
We meticulously construct a dataset in the Chinese legal domain, encompassing over 1 million queries.
InternLM-Law achieves the highest average performance on LawBench, outperforming state-of-the-art models, including GPT-4, on 13 out of 20 subtasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-21T06:19:03Z) - A Survey on Large Language Models for Critical Societal Domains: Finance, Healthcare, and Law [65.87885628115946]
Large language models (LLMs) are revolutionizing the landscapes of finance, healthcare, and law.
We highlight the instrumental role of LLMs in enhancing diagnostic and treatment methodologies in healthcare, innovating financial analytics, and refining legal interpretation and compliance strategies.
We critically examine the ethics for LLM applications in these fields, pointing out the existing ethical concerns and the need for transparent, fair, and robust AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-02T22:43:02Z) - Rethinking Legal Compliance Automation: Opportunities with Large Language Models [2.9088208525097365]
We argue that the examination of (textual) legal artifacts should, first employ broader context than sentences.
We present a compliance analysis approach designed to address these limitations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-22T17:10:27Z) - Legal Requirements Analysis [2.3349787245442966]
We explore a variety of methods for analyzing legal requirements and exemplify them on representations.
We describe possible alternatives for creating machine-analyzable representations from regulations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-23T09:31:57Z) - Precedent-Enhanced Legal Judgment Prediction with LLM and Domain-Model
Collaboration [52.57055162778548]
Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) has become an increasingly crucial task in Legal AI.
Precedents are the previous legal cases with similar facts, which are the basis for the judgment of the subsequent case in national legal systems.
Recent advances in deep learning have enabled a variety of techniques to be used to solve the LJP task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-13T16:47:20Z) - Large Language Models as Tax Attorneys: A Case Study in Legal
Capabilities Emergence [5.07013500385659]
This paper explores Large Language Models' (LLMs) capabilities in applying tax law.
Our experiments demonstrate emerging legal understanding capabilities, with improved performance in each subsequent OpenAI model release.
Findings indicate that LLMs, particularly when combined with prompting enhancements and the correct legal texts, can perform at high levels of accuracy but not yet at expert tax lawyer levels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-12T12:40:48Z) - DLT Compliance Reporting [0.0]
The IS discourse on the potential of distributed ledger technology (DLT) in the financial services has grown at a tremendous pace in recent years.
Yet, little has been said about the related implications for the costly and highly regulated process of compliance reporting.
We employ the design science research methodology (DSR) in the design, development, and evaluation of an artefact, enabling the automated collection and enrichment of transactional data.
Our findings indicate that DLT may facilitate the automation of key compliance processes through the implementation of a "pull-model", in which regulators can access compliance data in near real-time to stage aggregate exposures
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-31T11:19:15Z) - Distributed Machine Learning and the Semblance of Trust [66.1227776348216]
Federated Learning (FL) allows the data owner to maintain data governance and perform model training locally without having to share their data.
FL and related techniques are often described as privacy-preserving.
We explain why this term is not appropriate and outline the risks associated with over-reliance on protocols that were not designed with formal definitions of privacy in mind.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-21T08:44:05Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.