Empowering Prior to Court Legal Analysis: A Transparent and Accessible Dataset for Defensive Statement Classification and Interpretation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10702v1
• Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 11:22:27 GMT
• Title: Empowering Prior to Court Legal Analysis: A Transparent and Accessible Dataset for Defensive Statement Classification and Interpretation
• Authors: Yannis Spyridis, Jean-Paul, Haneen Deeb, Vasileios Argyriou,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a novel dataset tailored for classification of statements made during police interviews, prior to court proceedings. We introduce a fine-tuned DistilBERT model that achieves state-of-the-art performance in distinguishing truthful from deceptive statements. We also present an XAI interface that empowers both legal professionals and non-specialists to interact with and benefit from our system.
• Score: 5.646219481667151
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The classification of statements provided by individuals during police interviews is a complex and significant task within the domain of natural language processing (NLP) and legal informatics. The lack of extensive domain-specific datasets raises challenges to the advancement of NLP methods in the field. This paper aims to address some of the present challenges by introducing a novel dataset tailored for classification of statements made during police interviews, prior to court proceedings. Utilising the curated dataset for training and evaluation, we introduce a fine-tuned DistilBERT model that achieves state-of-the-art performance in distinguishing truthful from deceptive statements. To enhance interpretability, we employ explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods to offer explainability through saliency maps, that interpret the model's decision-making process. Lastly, we present an XAI interface that empowers both legal professionals and non-specialists to interact with and benefit from our system. Our model achieves an accuracy of 86%, and is shown to outperform a custom transformer architecture in a comparative study. This holistic approach advances the accessibility, transparency, and effectiveness of statement analysis, with promising implications for both legal practice and research.

Related papers

• Augmenting Legal Decision Support Systems with LLM-based NLI for Analyzing Social Media Evidence [0.0]
  This paper presents our system description and error analysis of our entry for NLLP 2024 shared task on Legal Natural Language Inference (L-NLI) The task required classifying relationships as entailed, contradicted, or neutral, indicating any association between the review and the complaint. Our system emerged as the winning submission, significantly outperforming other entries with a substantial margin and demonstrating the effectiveness of our approach in legal text analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T13:20:15Z)
• Con-ReCall: Detecting Pre-training Data in LLMs via Contrastive Decoding [118.75567341513897]
  Existing methods typically analyze target text in isolation or solely with non-member contexts. We propose Con-ReCall, a novel approach that leverages the asymmetric distributional shifts induced by member and non-member contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-05T09:10:38Z)
• A Multi-Source Heterogeneous Knowledge Injected Prompt Learning Method for Legal Charge Prediction [3.52209555388364]
  We propose a prompt learning framework-based method for modeling case descriptions. We leverage multi-source external knowledge from a legal knowledge base, a conversational LLM, and legal articles. Our method achieves state-of-the-art results on CAIL-2018, the largest legal charge prediction dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T04:53:17Z)
• Legal Judgment Reimagined: PredEx and the Rise of Intelligent AI Interpretation in Indian Courts [6.339932924789635]
  textbfPrediction with textbfExplanation (textttPredEx) is the largest expert-annotated dataset for legal judgment prediction and explanation in the Indian context. This corpus significantly enhances the training and evaluation of AI models in legal analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T14:57:48Z)
• DELTA: Pre-train a Discriminative Encoder for Legal Case Retrieval via Structural Word Alignment [55.91429725404988]
  We introduce DELTA, a discriminative model designed for legal case retrieval. We leverage shallow decoders to create information bottlenecks, aiming to enhance the representation ability. Our approach can outperform existing state-of-the-art methods in legal case retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T10:40:14Z)
• Enhancing Pre-Trained Language Models with Sentence Position Embeddings for Rhetorical Roles Recognition in Legal Opinions [0.16385815610837165]
  The size of legal opinions continues to grow, making it increasingly challenging to develop a model that can accurately predict the rhetorical roles of legal opinions. We propose a novel model architecture for automatically predicting rhetorical roles using pre-trained language models (PLMs) enhanced with knowledge of sentence position information. Based on an annotated corpus from the LegalEval@SemEval2023 competition, we demonstrate that our approach requires fewer parameters, resulting in lower computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T20:33:55Z)
• The Legal Argument Reasoning Task in Civil Procedure [2.079168053329397]
  We present a new NLP task and dataset from the domain of the U.S. civil procedure. Each instance of the dataset consists of a general introduction to the case, a particular question, and a possible solution argument.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-05T17:41:00Z)
• A Latent-Variable Model for Intrinsic Probing [93.62808331764072]
  We propose a novel latent-variable formulation for constructing intrinsic probes. We find empirical evidence that pre-trained representations develop a cross-lingually entangled notion of morphosyntax.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-20T15:01:12Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space [62.997667081978825]
  Counterfactual explanations aim to provide to end users a set of features that need to be changed in order to achieve a desired outcome. Current approaches rarely take into account the feasibility of actions needed to achieve the proposed explanations. We present Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space (CEILS), a methodology to generate counterfactual explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T20:48:48Z)
• Generative Counterfactuals for Neural Networks via Attribute-Informed Perturbation [51.29486247405601]
  We design a framework to generate counterfactuals for raw data instances with the proposed Attribute-Informed Perturbation (AIP) By utilizing generative models conditioned with different attributes, counterfactuals with desired labels can be obtained effectively and efficiently. Experimental results on real-world texts and images demonstrate the effectiveness, sample quality as well as efficiency of our designed framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-18T08:37:13Z)
• Knowledge-Aware Procedural Text Understanding with Multi-Stage Training [110.93934567725826]
  We focus on the task of procedural text understanding, which aims to comprehend such documents and track entities' states and locations during a process. Two challenges, the difficulty of commonsense reasoning and data insufficiency, still remain unsolved. We propose a novel KnOwledge-Aware proceduraL text understAnding (KOALA) model, which effectively leverages multiple forms of external knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-28T10:28:40Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.