How Algorithms Shape the Distribution of Political Advertising: Case
Studies of Facebook, Google, and TikTok
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.04720v2
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:46:46 GMT
- Title: How Algorithms Shape the Distribution of Political Advertising: Case
Studies of Facebook, Google, and TikTok
- Authors: Orestis Papakyriakopoulos, Christelle Tessono, Arvind Narayanan, Mihir
Kshirsagar
- Abstract summary: We analyze a dataset containing over 800,000 ads and 2.5 million videos about the 2020 U.S. presidential election from Facebook, Google, and TikTok.
We conduct the first large scale data analysis of public data to critically evaluate how these platforms amplified or moderated the distribution of political advertisements.
We conclude with recommendations for how to improve the disclosures so that the public can hold the platforms and political advertisers accountable.
- Score: 5.851101657703105
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Online platforms play an increasingly important role in shaping democracy by
influencing the distribution of political information to the electorate. In
recent years, political campaigns have spent heavily on the platforms'
algorithmic tools to target voters with online advertising. While the public
interest in understanding how platforms perform the task of shaping the
political discourse has never been higher, the efforts of the major platforms
to make the necessary disclosures to understand their practices falls woefully
short. In this study, we collect and analyze a dataset containing over 800,000
ads and 2.5 million videos about the 2020 U.S. presidential election from
Facebook, Google, and TikTok. We conduct the first large scale data analysis of
public data to critically evaluate how these platforms amplified or moderated
the distribution of political advertisements. We conclude with recommendations
for how to improve the disclosures so that the public can hold the platforms
and political advertisers accountable.
Related papers
- On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes.
Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z) - On Detecting Policy-Related Political Ads: An Exploratory Analysis of
Meta Ads in 2022 French Election [8.191542320784347]
The budget spent solely on political advertising in the U.S. has increased by more than 100% from $700 million during the 2017-2018 U.S. election cycle to $1.6 billion during the 2020 U.S. presidential elections.
The capacity offered by online platforms to micro-target ads with political content has been worrying lawmakers, journalists, and online platforms.
Online platforms and regulators have agreed that researchers, journalists, and civil society need to be able to scrutinize the political ads running on large online platforms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-14T09:04:43Z) - Design and analysis of tweet-based election models for the 2021 Mexican
legislative election [55.41644538483948]
We use a dataset of 15 million election-related tweets in the six months preceding election day.
We find that models using data with geographical attributes determine the results of the election with better precision and accuracy than conventional polling methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-02T12:40:05Z) - Political advertisement on Facebook and Instagram in the run up to 2022
Italian general election [0.9496529663479973]
We study the extent to which political ads were delivered on Facebook and Instagram in the run up to 2022 Italian general election.
We analyze over 23 k unique ads paid by 2.7 k unique sponsors, with an associated amount spent of 4 M EUR and over 1 billion views generated.
We find results that are in accordance with their political agenda and the electoral outcome.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-12T13:37:18Z) - Weakly Supervised Learning for Analyzing Political Campaigns on Facebook [24.29993132301275]
We propose a weakly supervised approach to identify the stance and issue of political ads on Facebook.
We analyze the temporal dynamics of the political ads on election polls.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-19T15:35:37Z) - Millions of Co-purchases and Reviews Reveal the Spread of Polarization
and Lifestyle Politics across Online Markets [68.8204255655161]
We study the pervasiveness of polarization and lifestyle politics over different product segments in a diverse market.
We sample 234.6 million relations among 21.8 million market entities to find product categories that are politically relevant, aligned, and polarized.
Cultural products are 4 times more polarized than any other segment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-17T18:16:37Z) - Theme Analysis of Political Facebook Ads in the 2021 Dutch General
Election [0.0]
The Cambridge Analytica scandal revealed that political campaigns are using social media on a large scale.
One such transparency effort is the Facebook Ad Library, a public repository of all political ads run on Facebook and Instagram.
This paper analyses political ads in more depth, by examining the themes that ads are about.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-12T16:05:53Z) - Shifting Polarization and Twitter News Influencers between two U.S.
Presidential Elections [92.33485580547801]
We analyze the change of polarization between the 2016 and 2020 U.S. presidential elections.
Most of the top influencers were affiliated with media organizations during both elections.
75% of the top influencers in 2020 were not present in 2016, demonstrating that such status is difficult to retain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-03T20:08:54Z) - Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online
political polarization [58.720142291102135]
A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations.
This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z) - Understanding the Complexity of Detecting Political Ads [0.9391375268580806]
We take an empirical approach to analyze what kind of ads are deemed political by ordinary people and what kind of ads lead to disagreement.
Our results imply that it is important to consider social issue ads as political, but they also complicate political advertising regulations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-01T07:44:08Z) - Political audience diversity and news reliability in algorithmic ranking [54.23273310155137]
We propose using the political diversity of a website's audience as a quality signal.
Using news source reliability ratings from domain experts and web browsing data from a diverse sample of 6,890 U.S. citizens, we first show that websites with more extreme and less politically diverse audiences have lower journalistic standards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-16T02:13:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.