Revisiting Some Common Practices in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.07505v1
• Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 13:03:05 GMT
• Title: Revisiting Some Common Practices in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: Wei Fu, Chao Yu, Zelai Xu, Jiaqi Yang, and Yi Wu
• Abstract summary: We show that in environments with a highly multi-modal reward landscape, value decomposition, and parameter sharing can be problematic and lead to undesired outcomes. In contrast, policy gradient (PG) methods with individual policies provably converge to an optimal solution in these cases. We present practical suggestions on implementing multi-agent PG algorithms for either high rewards or diverse emergent behaviors.
• Score: 11.91425153754564
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Many advances in cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) are based on two common design principles: value decomposition and parameter sharing. A typical MARL algorithm of this fashion decomposes a centralized Q-function into local Q-networks with parameters shared across agents. Such an algorithmic paradigm enables centralized training and decentralized execution (CTDE) and leads to efficient learning in practice. Despite all the advantages, we revisit these two principles and show that in certain scenarios, e.g., environments with a highly multi-modal reward landscape, value decomposition, and parameter sharing can be problematic and lead to undesired outcomes. In contrast, policy gradient (PG) methods with individual policies provably converge to an optimal solution in these cases, which partially supports some recent empirical observations that PG can be effective in many MARL testbeds. Inspired by our theoretical analysis, we present practical suggestions on implementing multi-agent PG algorithms for either high rewards or diverse emergent behaviors and empirically validate our findings on a variety of domains, ranging from the simplified matrix and grid-world games to complex benchmarks such as StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge and Google Research Football. We hope our insights could benefit the community towards developing more general and more powerful MARL algorithms. Check our project website at https://sites.google.com/view/revisiting-marl.

Related papers

• POGEMA: A Benchmark Platform for Cooperative Multi-Agent Navigation [76.67608003501479]
  We introduce and specify an evaluation protocol defining a range of domain-related metrics computed on the basics of the primary evaluation indicators. The results of such a comparison, which involves a variety of state-of-the-art MARL, search-based, and hybrid methods, are presented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T16:37:21Z)
• Ensembling Prioritized Hybrid Policies for Multi-agent Pathfinding [18.06081009550052]
  Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) based Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) has recently gained attention due to its efficiency and scalability. Several MARL-MAPF methods choose to use communication to enrich the information one agent can perceive. We propose a new method, Ensembling Prioritized Hybrid Policies (EPH)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T11:47:12Z)
• Context-Aware Bayesian Network Actor-Critic Methods for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [7.784991832712813]
  We introduce a Bayesian network to inaugurate correlations between agents' action selections in their joint policy. We develop practical algorithms to learn the context-aware Bayesian network policies. Empirical results on a range of MARL benchmarks show the benefits of our approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-02T21:22:27Z)
• Learning Reward Machines in Cooperative Multi-Agent Tasks [75.79805204646428]
  This paper presents a novel approach to Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) It combines cooperative task decomposition with the learning of reward machines (RMs) encoding the structure of the sub-tasks. The proposed method helps deal with the non-Markovian nature of the rewards in partially observable environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T15:12:28Z)
• Towards Global Optimality in Cooperative MARL with the Transformation And Distillation Framework [26.612749327414335]
  Decentralized execution is one core demand in cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) In this paper, we theoretically analyze two common classes of algorithms with decentralized policies -- multi-agent policy gradient methods and value-decomposition methods. We show that TAD-PPO can theoretically perform optimal policy learning in the finite multi-agent MDPs and shows significant outperformance on a large set of cooperative multi-agent tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-12T06:59:13Z)
• The Multi-Agent Pickup and Delivery Problem: MAPF, MARL and Its Warehouse Applications [2.969705152497174]
  We study two state-of-the-art solutions to the multi-agent pickup and delivery problem based on different principles. Specifically, a recent MAPF algorithm called conflict-based search (CBS) and a current MARL algorithm called shared experience actor-critic (SEAC) are studied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T13:23:35Z)
• Locality Matters: A Scalable Value Decomposition Approach for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [52.7873574425376]
  Cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) faces significant scalability issues due to state and action spaces that are exponentially large in the number of agents. We propose a novel, value-based multi-agent algorithm called LOMAQ, which incorporates local rewards in the Training Decentralized Execution paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-22T10:08:15Z)
• Q-Mixing Network for Multi-Agent Pathfinding in Partially Observable Grid Environments [62.997667081978825]
  We consider the problem of multi-agent navigation in partially observable grid environments. We suggest utilizing the reinforcement learning approach when the agents, first, learn the policies that map observations to actions and then follow these policies to reach their goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-13T09:44:47Z)
• Benchmarking Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Cooperative Tasks [11.480994804659908]
  Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (MARL) suffers from a lack of commonly-used evaluation tasks and criteria. We provide a systematic evaluation and comparison of three different classes of MARL algorithms. Our experiments serve as a reference for the expected performance of algorithms across different learning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T11:22:53Z)
• F2A2: Flexible Fully-decentralized Approximate Actor-critic for Cooperative Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning [110.35516334788687]
  Decentralized multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithms are sometimes unpractical in complicated applications. We propose a flexible fully decentralized actor-critic MARL framework, which can handle large-scale general cooperative multi-agent setting. Our framework can achieve scalability and stability for large-scale environment and reduce information transmission.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-17T14:56:29Z)
• FACMAC: Factored Multi-Agent Centralised Policy Gradients [103.30380537282517]
  We propose FACtored Multi-Agent Centralised policy gradients (FACMAC) It is a new method for cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning in both discrete and continuous action spaces. We evaluate FACMAC on variants of the multi-agent particle environments, a novel multi-agent MuJoCo benchmark, and a challenging set of StarCraft II micromanagement tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-14T21:29:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.