Diagnostic Tool for Out-of-Sample Model Evaluation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.10982v3
• Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 14:22:38 GMT
• Title: Diagnostic Tool for Out-of-Sample Model Evaluation
• Authors: Ludvig Hult, Dave Zachariah and Petre Stoica
• Abstract summary: We consider the use of a finite calibration data set to characterize the future, out-of-sample losses of a model. We propose a simple model diagnostic tool that provides finite-sample guarantees under weak assumptions.
• Score: 12.44615656370048
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Assessment of model fitness is a key part of machine learning. The standard paradigm is to learn models by minimizing a chosen loss function averaged over training data, with the aim of achieving small losses on future data. In this paper, we consider the use of a finite calibration data set to characterize the future, out-of-sample losses of a model. We propose a simple model diagnostic tool that provides finite-sample guarantees under weak assumptions. The tool is simple to compute and to interpret. Several numerical experiments are presented to show how the proposed method quantifies the impact of distribution shifts, aids the analysis of regression, and enables model selection as well as hyper-parameter tuning.

Related papers

• Learning Augmentation Policies from A Model Zoo for Time Series Forecasting [58.66211334969299]
  We introduce AutoTSAug, a learnable data augmentation method based on reinforcement learning. By augmenting the marginal samples with a learnable policy, AutoTSAug substantially improves forecasting performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T07:34:19Z)
• Explainability of Machine Learning Models under Missing Data [2.880748930766428]
  Missing data is a prevalent issue that can significantly impair model performance and interpretability. This paper briefly summarizes the development of the field of missing data and investigates the effects of various imputation methods on the calculation of Shapley values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-29T11:31:09Z)
• Outlier Gradient Analysis: Efficiently Identifying Detrimental Training Samples for Deep Learning Models [36.05242956018461]
  In this paper, we establish a bridge between identifying detrimental training samples via influence functions and outlier gradient detection. We first validate the hypothesis of our proposed outlier gradient analysis approach on synthetic datasets. We then demonstrate its effectiveness in detecting mislabeled samples in vision models and selecting data samples for improving performance of natural language processing transformer models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T21:34:46Z)
• Self-Supervised Dataset Distillation for Transfer Learning [77.4714995131992]
  We propose a novel problem of distilling an unlabeled dataset into a set of small synthetic samples for efficient self-supervised learning (SSL) We first prove that a gradient of synthetic samples with respect to a SSL objective in naive bilevel optimization is textitbiased due to randomness originating from data augmentations or masking. We empirically validate the effectiveness of our method on various applications involving transfer learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T10:48:52Z)
• Sampling To Improve Predictions For Underrepresented Observations In Imbalanced Data [0.0]
  Data imbalance negatively impacts the predictive performance of models on underrepresented observations. We propose sampling to adjust for this imbalance with the goal of improving the performance of models trained on historical production data. We apply our methods on a large biopharmaceutical manufacturing data set from an advanced simulation of penicillin production.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-17T12:16:54Z)
• Predictive machine learning for prescriptive applications: a coupled training-validating approach [77.34726150561087]
  We propose a new method for training predictive machine learning models for prescriptive applications. This approach is based on tweaking the validation step in the standard training-validating-testing scheme. Several experiments with synthetic data demonstrate promising results in reducing the prescription costs in both deterministic and real models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-22T15:03:20Z)
• ALT-MAS: A Data-Efficient Framework for Active Testing of Machine Learning Algorithms [58.684954492439424]
  We propose a novel framework to efficiently test a machine learning model using only a small amount of labeled test data. The idea is to estimate the metrics of interest for a model-under-test using Bayesian neural network (BNN)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-11T12:14:04Z)
• How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating and Auditing Generative Models [95.8037674226622]
  We introduce a 3-dimensional evaluation metric that characterizes the fidelity, diversity and generalization performance of any generative model in a domain-agnostic fashion. Our metric unifies statistical divergence measures with precision-recall analysis, enabling sample- and distribution-level diagnoses of model fidelity and diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T18:25:30Z)
• Sufficiently Accurate Model Learning for Planning [119.80502738709937]
  This paper introduces the constrained Sufficiently Accurate model learning approach. It provides examples of such problems, and presents a theorem on how close some approximate solutions can be. The approximate solution quality will depend on the function parameterization, loss and constraint function smoothness, and the number of samples in model learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-11T16:27:31Z)
• On Statistical Efficiency in Learning [37.08000833961712]
  We address the challenge of model selection to strike a balance between model fitting and model complexity. We propose an online algorithm that sequentially expands the model complexity to enhance selection stability and reduce cost. Experimental studies show that the proposed method has desirable predictive power and significantly less computational cost than some popular methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-24T16:08:29Z)
• A Semiparametric Approach to Interpretable Machine Learning [9.87381939016363]
  Black box models in machine learning have demonstrated excellent predictive performance in complex problems and high-dimensional settings. Their lack of transparency and interpretability restrict the applicability of such models in critical decision-making processes. We propose a novel approach to trading off interpretability and performance in prediction models using ideas from semiparametric statistics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T16:38:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.