Human-AI communication for human-human communication: Applying interpretable unsupervised anomaly detection to executive coaching

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.10987v1
• Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:32:59 GMT
• Title: Human-AI communication for human-human communication: Applying interpretable unsupervised anomaly detection to executive coaching
• Authors: Riku Arakawa, Hiromu Yakura
• Abstract summary: We discuss the potential of applying unsupervised anomaly detection in constructing AI-based interactive systems. The key idea behind this approach is to leave room for expert coaches to unleash their open-ended interpretations. Although the applicability of this approach should be validated in other domains, we believe that the idea of leveraging unsupervised anomaly detection to construct AI-based interactive systems would shed light on another direction of human-AI communication.
• Score: 33.88509725285237
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, we discuss the potential of applying unsupervised anomaly detection in constructing AI-based interactive systems that deal with highly contextual situations, i.e., human-human communication, in collaboration with domain experts. We reached this approach of utilizing unsupervised anomaly detection through our experience of developing a computational support tool for executive coaching, which taught us the importance of providing interpretable results so that expert coaches can take both the results and contexts into account. The key idea behind this approach is to leave room for expert coaches to unleash their open-ended interpretations, rather than simplifying the nature of social interactions to well-defined problems that are tractable by conventional supervised algorithms. In addition, we found that this approach can be extended to nurturing novice coaches; by prompting them to interpret the results from the system, it can provide the coaches with educational opportunities. Although the applicability of this approach should be validated in other domains, we believe that the idea of leveraging unsupervised anomaly detection to construct AI-based interactive systems would shed light on another direction of human-AI communication.

Related papers

• Opening the Black-Box: A Systematic Review on Explainable AI in Remote Sensing [51.524108608250074]
  Black-box machine learning approaches have become a dominant modeling paradigm for knowledge extraction in remote sensing. We perform a systematic review to identify the key trends in the field and shed light on novel explainable AI approaches. We also give a detailed outlook on the challenges and promising research directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T13:19:58Z)
• Human-AI collaboration is not very collaborative yet: A taxonomy of interaction patterns in AI-assisted decision making from a systematic review [6.013543974938446]
  Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in decision support systems has disproportionately focused on technological advancements. A human-centered perspective attempts to alleviate this concern by designing AI solutions for seamless integration with existing processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T17:46:38Z)
• Improving Grounded Language Understanding in a Collaborative Environment by Interacting with Agents Through Help Feedback [42.19685958922537]
  We argue that human-AI collaboration should be interactive, with humans monitoring the work of AI agents and providing feedback that the agent can understand and utilize. In this work, we explore these directions using the challenging task defined by the IGLU competition, an interactive grounded language understanding task in a MineCraft-like world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T05:37:59Z)
• BO-Muse: A human expert and AI teaming framework for accelerated experimental design [58.61002520273518]
  Our algorithm lets the human expert take the lead in the experimental process. We show that our algorithm converges sub-linearly, at a rate faster than the AI or human alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-03T02:56:05Z)
• Multi-AI Complex Systems in Humanitarian Response [0.0]
  We describe how multi-AI systems can arise, even in relatively simple real-world humanitarian response scenarios, and lead to potentially emergent and erratic erroneous behavior. This paper is designed to be a first exposition on this topic in the field of humanitarian response, raising awareness, exploring the possible landscape of this domain, and providing a starting point for future work within the wider community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-24T03:01:21Z)
• Doubting AI Predictions: Influence-Driven Second Opinion Recommendation [92.30805227803688]
  We propose a way to augment human-AI collaboration by building on a common organizational practice: identifying experts who are likely to provide complementary opinions. The proposed approach aims to leverage productive disagreement by identifying whether some experts are likely to disagree with an algorithmic assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-29T20:35:07Z)
• Teachable Reinforcement Learning via Advice Distillation [161.43457947665073]
  We propose a new supervision paradigm for interactive learning based on "teachable" decision-making systems that learn from structured advice provided by an external teacher. We show that agents that learn from advice can acquire new skills with significantly less human supervision than standard reinforcement learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-19T03:22:57Z)
• An Interactive Explanatory AI System for Industrial Quality Control [0.8889304968879161]
  We aim to extend the defect detection task towards an interactive human-in-the-loop approach. We propose an approach for an interactive support system for classifications in an industrial quality control setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-17T09:04:46Z)
• Deep Interpretable Models of Theory of Mind For Human-Agent Teaming [0.7734726150561086]
  We develop an interpretable modular neural framework for modeling the intentions of other observed entities. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach with experiments on data from human participants on a search and rescue task in Minecraft.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T06:18:58Z)
• A general framework for scientifically inspired explanations in AI [76.48625630211943]
  We instantiate the concept of structure of scientific explanation as the theoretical underpinning for a general framework in which explanations for AI systems can be implemented. This framework aims to provide the tools to build a "mental-model" of any AI system so that the interaction with the user can provide information on demand and be closer to the nature of human-made explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T10:32:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.