Quantification of Deep Neural Network Prediction Uncertainties for VVUQ of Machine Learning Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.14615v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 20:49:57 GMT
• Title: Quantification of Deep Neural Network Prediction Uncertainties for VVUQ of Machine Learning Models
• Authors: Mahmoud Yaseen, Xu Wu
• Abstract summary: This work aims at quantifying the prediction, or approximation uncertainties of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) when they are used as surrogate models for expensive physical models. Three techniques for UQ of DNNs are compared, namely Monte Carlo Dropout (MCD), Deep Ensembles (DE) and Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs)
• Score: 1.929039244357139
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recent performance breakthroughs in Artificial intelligence (AI) and Machine learning (ML), especially advances in Deep learning (DL), the availability of powerful, easy-to-use ML libraries (e.g., scikit-learn, TensorFlow, PyTorch.), and increasing computational power have led to unprecedented interest in AI/ML among nuclear engineers. For physics-based computational models, Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification (VVUQ) have been very widely investigated and a lot of methodologies have been developed. However, VVUQ of ML models has been relatively less studied, especially in nuclear engineering. In this work, we focus on UQ of ML models as a preliminary step of ML VVUQ, more specifically, Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) because they are the most widely used supervised ML algorithm for both regression and classification tasks. This work aims at quantifying the prediction, or approximation uncertainties of DNNs when they are used as surrogate models for expensive physical models. Three techniques for UQ of DNNs are compared, namely Monte Carlo Dropout (MCD), Deep Ensembles (DE) and Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs). Two nuclear engineering examples are used to benchmark these methods, (1) time-dependent fission gas release data using the Bison code, and (2) void fraction simulation based on the BFBT benchmark using the TRACE code. It was found that the three methods typically require different DNN architectures and hyperparameters to optimize their performance. The UQ results also depend on the amount of training data available and the nature of the data. Overall, all these three methods can provide reasonable estimations of the approximation uncertainties. The uncertainties are generally smaller when the mean predictions are close to the test data, while the BNN methods usually produce larger uncertainties than MCD and DE.

Related papers

• An Investigation on Machine Learning Predictive Accuracy Improvement and Uncertainty Reduction using VAE-based Data Augmentation [2.517043342442487]
  Deep generative learning uses certain ML models to learn the underlying distribution of existing data and generate synthetic samples that resemble the real data. In this study, our objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of data augmentation using variational autoencoder (VAE)-based deep generative models. We investigated whether the data augmentation leads to improved accuracy in the predictions of a deep neural network (DNN) model trained using the augmented data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T18:15:48Z)
• Inferring Data Preconditions from Deep Learning Models for Trustworthy Prediction in Deployment [25.527665632625627]
  It is important to reason about the trustworthiness of the model's predictions with unseen data during deployment. Existing methods for specifying and verifying traditional software are insufficient for this task. We propose a novel technique that uses rules derived from neural network computations to infer data preconditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-26T03:47:18Z)
• The effect of data augmentation and 3D-CNN depth on Alzheimer's Disease detection [51.697248252191265]
  This work summarizes and strictly observes best practices regarding data handling, experimental design, and model evaluation. We focus on Alzheimer's Disease (AD) detection, which serves as a paradigmatic example of challenging problem in healthcare. Within this framework, we train predictive 15 models, considering three different data augmentation strategies and five distinct 3D CNN architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T10:40:41Z)
• Evaluation of machine learning architectures on the quantification of epistemic and aleatoric uncertainties in complex dynamical systems [0.0]
  Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is a self assessed estimate of the model error. We examine several machine learning techniques, including both Gaussian processes and a family UQ-augmented neural networks. We evaluate UQ accuracy (distinct from model accuracy) using two metrics: the distribution of normalized residuals on validation data, and the distribution of estimated uncertainties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-27T02:35:25Z)
• Deep learning applied to computational mechanics: A comprehensive review, state of the art, and the classics [77.34726150561087]
  Recent developments in artificial neural networks, particularly deep learning (DL), are reviewed in detail. Both hybrid and pure machine learning (ML) methods are discussed. History and limitations of AI are recounted and discussed, with particular attention at pointing out misstatements or misconceptions of the classics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-18T02:03:00Z)
• Intelligence Processing Units Accelerate Neuromorphic Learning [52.952192990802345]
  Spiking neural networks (SNNs) have achieved orders of magnitude improvement in terms of energy consumption and latency. We present an IPU-optimized release of our custom SNN Python package, snnTorch.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-19T15:44:08Z)
• Gone Fishing: Neural Active Learning with Fisher Embeddings [55.08537975896764]
  There is an increasing need for active learning algorithms that are compatible with deep neural networks. This article introduces BAIT, a practical representation of tractable, and high-performing active learning algorithm for neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-17T17:26:31Z)
• Rank-R FNN: A Tensor-Based Learning Model for High-Order Data Classification [69.26747803963907]
  Rank-R Feedforward Neural Network (FNN) is a tensor-based nonlinear learning model that imposes Canonical/Polyadic decomposition on its parameters. First, it handles inputs as multilinear arrays, bypassing the need for vectorization, and can thus fully exploit the structural information along every data dimension. We establish the universal approximation and learnability properties of Rank-R FNN, and we validate its performance on real-world hyperspectral datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-11T16:37:32Z)
• ALT-MAS: A Data-Efficient Framework for Active Testing of Machine Learning Algorithms [58.684954492439424]
  We propose a novel framework to efficiently test a machine learning model using only a small amount of labeled test data. The idea is to estimate the metrics of interest for a model-under-test using Bayesian neural network (BNN)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-11T12:14:04Z)
• NL-CNN: A Resources-Constrained Deep Learning Model based on Nonlinear Convolution [0.0]
  A novel convolution neural network model, abbreviated NL-CNN, is proposed, where nonlinear convolution is emulated in a cascade of convolution + nonlinearity layers. Performance evaluation for several widely known datasets is provided, showing several relevant features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-30T13:38:42Z)
• Training Deep Neural Networks with Constrained Learning Parameters [4.917317902787792]
  A significant portion of deep learning tasks would run on edge computing systems. We propose the Combinatorial Neural Network Training Algorithm (CoNNTrA) CoNNTrA trains deep learning models with ternary learning parameters on the MNIST, Iris and ImageNet data sets. Our results indicate that CoNNTrA models use 32x less memory and have errors at par with the Backpropagation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-01T16:20:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.