Is it possible not to cheat on the Turing Test: Exploring the potential and challenges for true natural language 'understanding' by computers

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.14672v2
• Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 11:22:50 GMT
• Title: Is it possible not to cheat on the Turing Test: Exploring the potential and challenges for true natural language 'understanding' by computers
• Authors: Lize Alberts
• Abstract summary: The area of natural language understanding in artificial intelligence claims to have been making great strides. A comprehensive, interdisciplinary overview of current approaches and remaining challenges is yet to be carried out. I unite all of these perspectives to unpack the challenges involved in reaching true (human-like) language understanding.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent hype surrounding the increasing sophistication of language processing models has renewed optimism regarding machines achieving a human-like command of natural language. The area of natural language understanding in artificial intelligence claims to have been making great strides in this area, however, the lack of conceptual clarity in how 'understanding' is used in this and other disciplines have made it difficult to discern how close we actually are. A comprehensive, interdisciplinary overview of current approaches and remaining challenges is yet to be carried out. Beyond linguistic knowledge, this requires considering our species-specific capabilities to categorize, memorize, label and communicate our (sufficiently similar) embodied and situated experiences. Moreover, gauging the practical constraints requires critically analyzing the technical capabilities of current models, as well as deeper philosophical reflection on theoretical possibilities and limitations. In this paper, I unite all of these perspectives -- the philosophical, cognitive-linguistic, and technical -- to unpack the challenges involved in reaching true (human-like) language understanding. By unpacking the theoretical assumptions inherent in current approaches, I hope to illustrate how far we actually are from achieving this goal, if indeed it is the goal.

Related papers

• Expressivity and Speech Synthesis [51.75420054449122]
  We outline the methodological advances that brought us so far and sketch out the ongoing efforts to reach that coveted next level of artificial expressivity. We also discuss the societal implications coupled with rapidly advancing expressive speech synthesis (ESS) technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T08:47:24Z)
• Rethinking the Evaluating Framework for Natural Language Understanding in AI Systems: Language Acquisition as a Core for Future Metrics [0.0]
  In the burgeoning field of artificial intelligence (AI), the unprecedented progress of large language models (LLMs) in natural language processing (NLP) offers an opportunity to revisit the entire approach of traditional metrics of machine intelligence. Our paper proposes a paradigm shift from the established Turing Test towards an all-embracing framework that hinges on language acquisition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-21T11:34:52Z)
• Brain-Inspired Computational Intelligence via Predictive Coding [89.6335791546526]
  Predictive coding (PC) has shown promising performance in machine intelligence tasks. PC can model information processing in different brain areas, can be used in cognitive control and robotics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T16:37:16Z)
• From Word Models to World Models: Translating from Natural Language to the Probabilistic Language of Thought [124.40905824051079]
  We propose rational meaning construction, a computational framework for language-informed thinking. We frame linguistic meaning as a context-sensitive mapping from natural language into a probabilistic language of thought. We show that LLMs can generate context-sensitive translations that capture pragmatically-appropriate linguistic meanings. We extend our framework to integrate cognitively-motivated symbolic modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-22T05:14:00Z)
• On the Computation of Meaning, Language Models and Incomprehensible Horrors [0.0]
  We integrate foundational theories of meaning with a mathematical formalism of artificial general intelligence (AGI) Our findings shed light on the relationship between meaning and intelligence, and how we can build machines that comprehend and intend meaning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-25T09:41:00Z)
• Mind the Gap! Bridging Explainable Artificial Intelligence and Human Understanding with Luhmann's Functional Theory of Communication [5.742215677251865]
  We apply social systems theory to highlight challenges in explainable artificial intelligence. We aim to reinvigorate the technical research in the direction of interactive and iterative explainers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-07T13:31:02Z)
• Beyond Interpretable Benchmarks: Contextual Learning through Cognitive and Multimodal Perception [0.0]
  This study contends that the Turing Test is misinterpreted as an attempt to anthropomorphize computer systems. It emphasizes tacit learning as a cornerstone of general-purpose intelligence, despite its lack of overt interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-04T08:30:04Z)
• The Debate Over Understanding in AI's Large Language Models [0.18275108630751835]
  We survey a current, heated debate in the AI research community on whether large pre-trained language models can be said to "understand" language. We argue that a new science of intelligence can be developed that will provide insight into distinct modes of understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T17:04:29Z)
• Imagination-Augmented Natural Language Understanding [71.51687221130925]
  We introduce an Imagination-Augmented Cross-modal (iACE) to solve natural language understanding tasks. iACE enables visual imagination with external knowledge transferred from the powerful generative and pre-trained vision-and-language models. Experiments on GLUE and SWAG show that iACE achieves consistent improvement over visually-supervised pre-trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-18T19:39:36Z)
• Emergence of Machine Language: Towards Symbolic Intelligence with Neural Networks [73.94290462239061]
  We propose to combine symbolism and connectionism principles by using neural networks to derive a discrete representation. By designing an interactive environment and task, we demonstrated that machines could generate a spontaneous, flexible, and semantic language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-14T14:54:58Z)
• WenLan 2.0: Make AI Imagine via a Multimodal Foundation Model [74.4875156387271]
  We develop a novel foundation model pre-trained with huge multimodal (visual and textual) data. We show that state-of-the-art results can be obtained on a wide range of downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-27T12:25:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.